Blogs

Diouf Introduces Himself To Glasgow.

|

Transfer Deadline Day was a bit of a drag if you were Celtic fan. Though that depends on your outlook.

It got interesting at around 8pm when it was rumoured that our neighbours were going to delve into a barrel of unprecedented c*ntness. You had to applaud their admittance of desperation as the most hated footballer in Britain walked through their doors.

Hounded out of Blackburn who were that desperate to get rid that they are picking up 80% of his tab in Glasgow.

The man is a despicable human being but even then that is an insult to despicable human beings. Walter No Shame has previous at turning a blind eye to his players misdemeanour’s if they might do him a turn. It’s called dignity. Well, that’s what we are told.

Seemingly last night he took his bow and received a warm reception from the fans of his new club. Strange that. When he stood over a player with a double leg break telling him to get up as he had dived the fans of his new club weren’t quite so warm.*

Some of the highlights from that thread: “That El hadj-diouf is a real scumbag.”, “I honestly think El Hadj-Diouf is the most repulsive scumbag in modern football. Balotelli looks to be going the same way as this manky bastard.”, “F*c***g low – life scumbag.”, “diouf and de jong both the same.absolute scum.shocking shocking excuses for professionals.”, “Someone will end up “doing” Diouf sometime soon.”, “Dont like De Jong but Diouf is scum of a different level. He is a  absolute fud who deserves a career ending injury.”, “Why anyone gives Diouf a wage in football is beyond me.” and “warnock may not be every ones cup of tea however i long for the day we have someone at Rangers with his balls to come out and say it as it is and take no shite from no one”.

My favourite is though: “a muslim wearing rosary beads at least hes clued up.”

The player who is like a  llama with a catarrh problem seems to have found a home where all his past misdemeanour’s are forgotten our airbrushed. It was a probably Chelsea player that did it.

Celtic to win 2-0 on Sunday 14/1 at Bet365. Click the banner to get free money for betting goodness.

*spotted by Celtic Research via Celtic Rumours.

Share this article

0 comments

  • max says:

    Wattie yasterday speaking of Diouf;

    “players get involved in things like that a lot of the time”

    Maybe ‘wattie’ could expand on that and tell us which players he’s refering to that find it part of the modern game to spit at supporters and in fellow professional players faces and screem profanities at players being stretchered of the park with double leg breaks!
    Training sessions at the hunnery must be fun to watch!
    He also says he should only be judged for his football, clearly laying out the huns standards of morality and the type of behaviour acceptable at the hunnery!!
    Slimebag? Scum of the earth? Sewer rat? Reknowned dirty filthy bast*rd that’s been shunned and pilloried by everyone who’s ever employed you? NO PROBLEM! come and be a superstar at the home of reknowned dirty filthy bast*rds!

    In Engurland he was described as a “sewer rat” ammoungst many other things, in Bonny multicultural Scotland he’s being described as a “15,000 pound a week playboy”!!

    The MBE’s in the post!!

  • trueblue says:

    ohh cmon give us a break if it was someone who spat on a rangers fan you lot be welcoming him as one of this erm celtic family short memories did your boss not spit on a rangers scarf which could have caused trouble short memories indeed personally i dont like spitting of any kind but then again im fussy what i spit on

  • trueblue says:

    huns standards of morality and the type of behaviour acceptable at the hunnery???? mmmm think max should worry about his own morals bit of pot calling kettle black here but hey thats typical of you lot isnt it bet max wouldnt say that out in the streets ehh muppet

  • Max says:

    ‘Pot calling the kettle black’, Please expand.

  • Max says:

    Huns going where they’re not wanted trying to cause trouble.
    “but hey that’s typical of you lot isn’t it”?

  • johnreilly says:

    when neil warnock described him as a sewer rat i agreed ,and hoped rats woudnt be offended ,his actions towards celtic fans, were just the tip of the iceberg ,i have also stated that if celtic had signed him, i would be equally disgusted, he is a despicable human being, to make comparisons to neil lennons action, is silly, i hear very little criticism , you surely cannot be happy with him representing your club

    • baxterboy says:

      and what of the celtic player keane is he a sewer rat also in your estimation – he bent over a guy and taunted him after giving the player an injury that had him out for more than a year.

  • baxterboy says:

    celtic player sutton spat twice on someone, was found guilty. then said it was a joke.
    diouf apologised for his act.
    quote:
    IT was a day of two halves for Chris Sutton yesterday

    The striker formally completed his Scottish transfer record £6m switch to Celtic from Chelsea after it was confirmed he passed a medical. But he was also convicted of spitting in the face of a trainee barrister a Manchester United fan after celebrating his wife’s birthday, in London. Sutton had denied losing his temper on being called a “third-rate footballer.”
    Sutton left court in bitter mood, claiming he was being made an example of as a famous footballer after the night out last October with ex-team-mates Dennis Wise and Jody Morris. “It’s a joke,” he said after being fined a total of £300, with £200 costs.

    • lordofthewing says:

      Sutton readily admits that he was a ‘wrong un’ of the field during his time in England. He learned and changed.

      Joof came up with some fairytale about him being patted on the head and how that was in his country slaves were treated. Pure pish.

      Has Joof apologised for all his misdemeanour’s?

      • baxterboy says:

        sutton spat twice on someone and diouf spat on someone. diouf apologised directly to the punter and offered him tickets and all expenses paid for the return game.
        saying you’re ‘a wrong un’ during many years in england is not a direct apology for a specific act to the individual spat on. however,i won’t worry about that although the lad who got it might.

        the real issue is the venomous criticism diouf is getting over it in comparison to sutton and terry.

        and lets face it. i was brought up in the streets of springburn and, while not particularly endearing, this act was status quo for both side of the divide in the tenements.
        since poverty traits are pretty well universal i’m sure reflex spitting is as prevelant in diouf’s slum as it was in ours.
        thats not saying its right. reflex habits are hard to break in the heat of the moment – and i think that falling into a group of celtic punters in a “battle of britain” qualifies as heat.
        he also committed the spitting acts when he was a ‘young un’

        • lordofthewing says:

          Joof has spat on people when he has been young and old. He hasn’t learned put it in the past. This makes all the apologies null and void. He thinks it’s acceptable and has done it on numerous occasions. He will do it again. It’s in his low slung jeans.

          Joof has found an accepting press. They are paid lickspittles doing Walters bidding. He will get an easy ride. Apart from Radio Hootsmon and Burley all the dead tree press have been taking the party line. I fully expect him to be portrayed as Mother Teresa in the next week. Typical deflection tactics used on numerous occasions by the press when all things r*ngers go past the ‘dignity’.

          Your defence of Joof reveals that as a person you are struggling to accept that scumbag. Your Springburn / Senegal comparison is pushing the egg to far.

  • baxterboy says:

    mackie went into the tackle with the intent to injure diouf teammate (look at the tackle on youtube)
    give him the benefit of doubt. ok
    what then of his horrendous tackle that broke ridgewell’s leg while playing for plymouth.
    keane broke a players leg then said he did it intentionally.
    diouf has never seriously injured anyone in his career.
    and has the Dioufy Foundation that helps poor kids in senegal and the UK

    • lordofthewing says:

      So Mackie deserved it in your warped logic? Plus another myth that Keane broke someones leg?

      Take your head out Keith Jacksons arse.

  • baxterboy says:

    this video states that he did: http://wn.com/roy_keane_breaks_rivals_leg
    the leg was not broken you are correct. it was worse – haaland never played a full game after that tackle and you can see why.
    keane also said in his book “the Truth” that he planned to seriously injure him and did so. it was premeditated before the game started.
    do you think there is a place in football for that kind of premeditation and assault?

    if a player goes into a tackle with intent to really seriously injure – mackie broke a players leg with a heinous tackle then tried to do the same on diouf’s teammate. i don’t think its warped logic to say he deserved what he intended to give.
    you live by the bullit you die by it.
    in this case he tried to shot someone and shot himself.

    and look, it’s easy to counter the ‘arse’ remark but let’s try and stay on the issue rather than stoop to personal abuse.

    • lordofthewing says:

      Have you checked why Haaland retired? Nothing to do with Keane’s ‘revenge’ tackle. It was an injury to his other knee.

      Again, your trying to justify Joof actions when you can’t. Mackie was to blame. That Everton ball boy was to blame. The fan deserved it.

      If you list tyrants atrocities side by side and compare them then Im sure you can come up with an argument that Pol Pot was a nice person. Or Hitler was running a Butlins, really.

      • baxterboy says:

        while spitting is not a particularly admiral trait, it is one shared by sutton who spits on people. sutton committed his act at 27, older than diouf who was 23.
        and the celtic supporters who spat on le guen’s car or lennon who spits on rangers scarfs, is, as you say, a lesser act than sutton and diouf spitting on people; however, that doesn’t negate the fact that it is a filthy act or are you defending this as ok?
        and lennon his act could have sparked a riot.

        while it is deplorable, sutton and diouf’s spitting is handbags stuff when it comes to physical violence in comparison with mackie’s tackle, and keane’s premeditation to injure someone and doing it.

        what would you prefer – wipe the spit off or recover from a physical assault intended to seriously injure.
        who in their right mind would chose getting seriously injured.
        this is why the keane and mackie acts are more reprehensible.
        and keane worst of all because his was premeditated.

        • lordofthewing says:

          I have never once defended Sutton or Keane. You seem to have a bee in your bonnet about both these players. The point I’m making is that you are going to great lengths to defend a proven scumbag whose actions, no matter his age, have been regular and shameless. The wrongs of others don’t make actions right.

          That’s the the whole point in this. Your deflections and accusations that others wrongs make him right are laughable.

  • baxterboy says:

    you slag diouf for bending over a guy while keane, a celtic player did exactly the same thing.
    check the pic on this site

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1050727/That-Keane-tackle-haunts-Haaland-horror-injury-2001.html#ixzz1DCyLyLLR

    double standard?

  • baxterboy says:

    why were celtic fc fined by euro heads for provoking diouf action?

  • baxterboy says:

    while you have refrained from defending sutton and keane it is accurate to conclude, according to the criteria diouf is being judged by, that the celtic player sutton and keane are a scumbag and sewer rat respectively for committing the same act as diouf.
    i do not justify diouf behaviour but try to examine why they occurred for a better understanding of the individual.
    i think it is also vital to include diouf’s good acts eg.- his charity foundation for poor children, when judging the merit of a man.

    what conclusion about yourself would we come to if we judged you solely by all the bad things you’ve done in life.

    • lordofthewing says:

      So a bit of charity work from a multi millionaire makes him a good sort? So does Bellamy but I still wouldn’t invite him to a BBQ at my house with a karaoke.

      I’m glad we didn’t sign him in the summer we dodged a bullet.

      Diouf was chased from his club because of his behaviour. No other club in Britain would touch him and only a few lowly French clubs tickled but couldn’t make up the 20% of wages being asked. Your club were that desperate they gave him a home.

  • baxterboy says:

    while we both agree that sutton and diouf spitting on a person is a filthy act.
    would you agree that lennon’s act of spitting on a rangers scarf and celtic supporters spitting on le guen’s car while he’s in it are also a filthy acts, notwithstanding the degree of filth.
    and would you agree that keane and mackie physical assault is worse than spitting?

    • lordofthewing says:

      Yes, off course I would agree though I have never said otherwise. Lennon paid for his folly and the fans that spat at Le Guen are an embarrassment. It’s not about the weight of the crimes commited that Diouf is being judged on.

      • baxterboy says:

        since you agree that lennon, the current celtic manager committed a filthy act and that sutton, a former celtic player, committed the same filthy act act as diouf, then i have no further comment and congratulate you on being objective.

        cheers

        • lordofthewing says:

          Spitting is terrible. Yes and there is different levels of crime. Spitting on a scarf is not the same as spitting at someone. Spitting on a scarf is not the same as getting followed then beaten to a pulp. It’s just not the spitting, it’s Diouf whole package.

          Your deflections just highlight that you must justify his crimes as your not comfortable admitting he’s a wrong un.

          Thanks for confirming my theroy.

Comments are closed.