16 thoughts on “5 Facts, Findings And Thoughts About Another Cup Final Defeat

  1. agree about the subs inactivity… change was needed when we’d still a chance (amazingly as bad as we were).

    we could all see that it was ‘one of those days’ with sammy reverting to type i.e a gormless lanky … etc etc’2nd touch a sliding tackle anyone?

    stokes the bar man’s comments true or no, stokes jnr should be fkn angry not getting on the pitch when it was so inept and crying out for change.

    mistake from lenny there i think.

    1. Subs, were a victim of circumstance more than anything. The Derry Pele was a waste of a sub. Unsure if Stokes would have made a difference. We were rank.

  2. I don’t think Samaras couldn’t be arsed, I just think he suffered from running down blind alleys disease. I do wish he’d pick his head up sometimes and see the guy on the wing screaming for a pass. He did that so many times yesterday. I watched the game with an English mate and he commented on how ball greedy he is. Frustrating !

  3. Samaras was still the only Celtic player who looked like he may do something

    much better than the seldom seen Hooper on the day

    1. I thought Sammy looked ‘up’ for it in the first 10. He then reverted to that all to familiar empty vessel.

  4. I’m sorry but Sammi was one of Celtic’s better players. I don’t get this Samaras hate, he was far superior and more influential than Hooper.

    1. He was superior in the fact that he made himself known, contrary to most of the team. However, his general play was selfish, had no direction and, for most of the game, he ran blindly with his head down, ignoring the majority of players who were screaming for a pass as a better option. Why we gave him a new contract, as a one game specialist, is beyond me. Romantic notions of him being able to get the better of Rangers are not sufficient justification in my book. He will continue to frustrate. Hooper was poor, but the “resurgent” midfield were worse and didn’t help him. That’s also the reason the defence fell apart. A poor team performance, nobody worked for the cause. We’ll rebound.

  5. As I said in the previous post the most important factor for me was Lennon being in the stand. Trackside, he would have fired the team up. That and the fact that the teams are more closely matched than y’awl give Rangers credit for. Three tournaments, one to Rangers, the league on a knife edge but still statistically in Rangers favour and a cup that Celtic should win. No evidence there after so many games to point towards clear Celtic superiority, in fact……..

    1. The gap wasn’t as wide as made out but a lot of Tims have gained a lot of confidence from how we have been playing. Fans are fickle and it’s either great or shit.

      Bottom line is we are further down the road of recovery than we should be no matter the end of the season.

  6. We were very poor and Lenny called it wrongly. He played a back four with a man who was never match fit in Rogne. The pitch was never going to help our style of play which he should have realised and went with a 4, 5 1 to give the weak defence some cover. To be honest Rangers posed very little threat other than long balls and endevour, which a decent side should nulify. Big Georgie given a new deal and he rewards us with a back to his best performance!!!!.

    Not many pass marks if any at all and most thought they had just to turn out to win.

    Hope we learn from this and go on ball busting run of wins to have a chance of the title.

  7. I dont think Hooper was fit as he pulled out the England U21s this week. I wonder about Commons as well. Lennon still blows it on the big games, a fit team would have won that cup.
    At least we get another crack at them, save the season and Lennons job maybe

Comments are closed.