4 thoughts on “Watt Dropped, Mulgrew To Start? Thoughts?

  1. As much as I love Mulgrew, the “experiment” can stop now. He’s not worth shoe-horning into the team for his delivery if Commons and Izaguirre are playing. Izaguirre travel ?

    Would like to see Hooper and Watt up front, 4-4-2, they play well together. Like Matthews and Lustig on the right. Lustig turning out to be better than I thought. How good is Ambrose ? (odd slack passes aside..)

    1. Mulgrew should only play at CB or on the left hand side of midfield in a four. That means Commons moving to the right. That doesn’t work imo. A change in midfield means that I think Watt will be dropped. He won’t drop Commons.

      Yes, Izzy travelled.

      I reckon he will play the conserative 4-3-3.

      FF, Lustig, Wilson, Efe, Izzy, Mulgrew, Ledley, Wanyama, Watt, Hooper & Commons, That leaves us a bit light of the bench.

      I worry about Efe. He’s started toooo welllllll, our CB’s are meant to look like coo’s on valuim for a couple of months after they sign…

  2. without brown it could very likely be like kilmarnock as midfield was a static sieve, I disagree with criticism of commons, he’s a matchwinner compared to james forrest who is a passenger and an imposter

    1. Commons is more often than not a match winner. On his day he is the best attacking midfielder in the league. Off his day he’s about as attractive as a wet dog on your new couch.

      Commons was part of the problem against Kilmarnock. That can’t be disputed.

Comments are closed.