Articles

Ange Says He Won’t Change His Celtic Approach. Well, There’ll Be More Nights Like Leverkusen.

|
Image for Ange Says He Won’t Change His Celtic Approach. Well, There’ll Be More Nights Like Leverkusen.

When do you stop being an idealist and transform into a zealot instead?

It’s a question that should be haunting Celtic fans today with Ange’s to the media last night in the aftermath of that game.

It’s a haunting question because he didn’t sound like a trailblazing manager fizzing with ideas last night; he sounded like someone welded, inflexibly, to a single style even if it proves to be suicidal and self-defeating. If I have one major worry, that’s what it is.

Let’s try and confront a few home truths here, shall we?

We were up against a team with vastly better players last night. come from a league which is awash in money. The value of their squad is three or four times what ours is worth. This is like Celtic playing against St Mirren at Parkhead.

Let’s also admit something else, something that might be difficult to accept; there is no transfer market strategy that we can pursue that will bring us up to the level of teams like that any more than there is a transfer market strategy that St Mirren can pursue to keep up with ours.

It is simply impossible. We don’t have those resources.

Those are two hard facts. When you acknowledge them you have to conclude that the only way a team like ours is going to beat a team like theirs is if we’re superbly coached, disciplined and tactically astute.

Last night was a brute force attempt at smash-and-grab … there was no finesse to it, and we were left critically exposed on the flanks.

In short, using that tactical system is insane against any team which has the players to punish you out wide and with the pace to stretch you across the backline. tore us to pieces last night, just as West Ham did in pre-season, and as the Spaniards did in Seville.

What’s worse is that I can think of at least one team – Hibs – who’s game is built on pace and energy on the flanks, and I think Martin Boyle will be rubbing his hands at the prospect of getting all that room to run in come our visit there in October.

Ange has great ideas about how should be played, but need to be aligned with a certain pragmatism as well. Callum McGregor has correctly identified one of the issues with this approach; that players need time to adapt to it, and that it’s a process which won’t be completed in a day. But in the meantime, is it too much to ask that the manager adopt a little more common sense in matches against top level opponents with the to really hurt you?

Callum’s comments raise another critical point; what if we don’t have players who are capable of adapting to that system?

Take Adam Montgomery; this is a winger who the club has tried to turn into a left back. Difficult enough. Now Ange wants him to play as an inverted full-back, which means cutting inside and playing through the middle at times … do we know that Montgomery is capable of that? That he has the skill-set required for it?

We would all love to think that this team will grow into this system until it’s all second nature; how do we know that’s true? Even if you’re buying players to fit into it, are we ever going to be able to play it at a level which lets us compete with the Leverkusen’s? Or does punching up require something more careful and considered? Something less reckless?

Ange says no. He says we won’t or change our style to suit the opposition; try that approach in any field of endeavour and see how far you get.

If you’re playing a game against a superior player, you adapt your play-style to suit.

If you’re a general who’s outnumbered, you don’t go gung-ho even if that’s what you’d normally do … and this guy refuses to change his approach?

That’s going to lead to other nights just like last night.

Everyone wants this guy to succeed, but if he’s not willing to adapt to suit the circumstances or the level of the opposition then success is almost certainly going to prove elusive.

Flexibility is the key to winning and trophies; rigid adherence to one system means you’re only waiting to get found out.

That almost certainly guarantees disaster … and it’s not conducive to getting the time one needs to get your more creative ideas across.

Related posts

Share this article

5 comments

  • John S says:

    Inflexible, predictable. ‘Into the valley of death…’

  • Jim says:

    I agree with much of this and I suspect Ange actually will be thinking much along the same lines, although he couldn’t very well come out and say, ‘well that’s enough of Ange-ball, from now on we’ll park the bus’.
    We have to remember that nights like this have been 18 years in the making.
    Ever since Seville the club has retreated into the bubble of Scottish football and all the ‘this is where we belong’ guff is forgotten after xmas. No matter how we had set up last night we would have taken a doing and this is the legacy of Desmond and Lawell, particularly after last season’s shambles.
    Eventually Ange will create something very special. In the meantime, he may have to be a little more pragmatic just to buy himself the time he needs to put it in place.

  • Mark B says:

    Every team and manager needs to adapt to context. If he can’t do that he will fail. Oh and we need a defensive midfielder left back and centre half as well of course. If he can’t see that he won’t be successful either.

  • Jorge says:

    Too much being made of the system being at fault: I support persevering with it. I’m getting more concerned about the player selection. The manager has been in the job long enough to know that Rogic and Turnbull should never appear on the same team sheet. McGregor is not the answer as main defensive midfielder when playing anybody above scottish championship level. Welsh should be in the starting eleven. It was wrong to play Montomery last night.

  • Iljas Baker says:

    Our problems are fairly easy to identify: The main problem being that the full backs don’t get back to defend and the midfield with Rogic and Turnbull with their lack of dynamism leave the two CBs even more exposed. Ange rightly doesn’t want to drop the system because he wants those who can adopt it now to get as much experience of it as possible. The plan is eventually that others will gradually be more fully able, Turnbull I’d say but not Rogic , Juranovic I think but not sure of Mc Carthy who remember like Scales was a DD choice. Ange hopes that eventually through a couple of transfer windows he will get the right players in – Jan will be a big step up – to complement those who are already a good fit. They don’t have to be super-expensive. Will the board help him out? And if they don’t what will happen? I think Ange will leave before he’s pushed sending a code like Dom “for personal reasons” that the board don’t keep their side of an agreement.

Comments are closed.