Articles

Why VAR Will Eventually Bring An End To The Anti-Celtic Era Of “Honest Mistakes”.

|
Image for Why VAR Will Eventually Bring An End To The Anti-Celtic Era Of “Honest Mistakes”.

Scottish football has had problems with officiating for as long as I can remember, and certainly as long as I’ve been alive. My old man could tell stories about things he’s seen that make some of what my own generation has watched seem pale in comparison.

The issue which stalks us has been there forever. You can go back as far as you want, and there it will be. One of the reasons it endures is that we dare not call it what it is.

The word “bias” is not allowed in mainstream discourse when you talk about officials. We are not supposed to call their “integrity” into question, as if there wasn’t at least some debate about whether some of them deserve to have that word associated with them.

We all know the names of refs who have been, and are, blatant cheats but this, more than anything else, is the Scottish football discussion that nobody outside of the fans wants to have.

Over the years, whenever someone has tried to make this a genuine matter for discussion a long line of people has stepped forward to defend Scottish refereeing.

When a senior journalist was asked, some ago, why we don’t just have them declare allegiances he acted as though it were an affront to their human rights or something, although just about every major league in Europe compels its to do so, including those south of the border.

In one astonishing radio interview, I once heard another journalist say that we must never investigate allegations of bias in Scottish football refereeing in case we find of it; “Because then the game is finished,” he said, as though the existence of cheating at that level didn’t render every game we watch worthless anyway, and the sport with it.

What kind of journalist says something like that? What kind of attitude is that? “If it goes on, fine, as long as we never have to know about it.”

It hardly needs to be pointed out that such a statement is appalling coming from someone in that particular trade, and runs counter to the whole idea of the profession. Can you imagine Woodward and Bernstein sitting down and debating if it might be better not to know whether the entire upper echelon of the US Federal Government was corrupt?

Instead, Scottish football hides behind comforting lies about itself, and when you think about it even the lies are kind of hilarious; we don’t have corrupt here, they are just useless. When that is your fall-back position you know your argument is in trouble.

Over time, we’ve thrown up numerous guardrails against anyone who wants to explore the issue beyond that line. We don’t scrutinise refereeing decisions. We don’t ask referees to explain them. We have accepted that these are just Honest Mistakes, no matter how glaring, no matter how blatant, no matter how otherwise inexplicable.

We all know of decisions so shocking that they can only be explained away by an official who had made up his mind to punish or reward a particular club on a particular day. We can all think back on at least of a couple of them without straining brain-cells too much. They become legendry amongst those who do actually study these matters.

See, the these people have and which they’ve always had is that any discussion about their can be halted simply by pointing out that these are human beings and human beings can fail to see the whole picture when they have to make a decision in a split second.

The creation of the review panel hasn’t changed that, because it can only alter certain decisions after the fact, when it’s too late. Even then, no referee is ever properly held to account for an “error”, no matter how grotesque or outrageous.

But technology has the power to change everything. It can be what consigns the entire era of to dustbin of history.

There are those who will express their concern that the decisions will still rest in the hands of the same corrupt and this is true, but for those officials the final fig-leaf will be ripped away. They will no longer be able to defend a senseless or baseless decision on the grounds that they were unsighted or had only a split second to call it.

This is what will finally reveal some of them for what they are. It will force them into giving decisions they would not normally give, and ditching calls they might have itched for. Some of the time, anyway. For the rest of the time it will force them to defend ridiculous decisions that they have had a chance to watch again and again before they make the final call.

That will reframe the whole debate around officiating in Scotland. When you have someone like Madden watching a decision three or four times on video and still “getting it wrong” then that will finally bring this thing to the surface where it can no longer be ignored or denied. What looks now to be inexplicable will finally become indefensible.

And that, my friends, is where the era of will finally come to an end.

Of course Celtic fans should back VAR.

It will be the best thing ever to happen to refereeing in Scotland and will be what finally gives us a fair crack of the whip, because sooner or later with the technology in place we’re going to force referees to play it straight, or push out of the game entirely those who aren’t.

It will change everything, for the better.

Related posts

Share this article

13 comments

  • Charlie Kelly says:

    Unfortunately it doesnt matter if we bring in VAR
    Only difference being is peepul who ref games and make decisions will be the same morons who watch VAR during games

    • Jim Duffy says:

      Exactly my thoughts Charlie it’s the same masonic bastards that will be checking the VAR,so what’s new,it’s like our masonic refs getting pulled up for a bad decision but it’s a bunch of masonic refs who will be judging him ,it’s like the police governing body getting a complaint about a policeman ,they govern themselves.

  • John Gunn says:

    I have been saying this for a couple of years now, you are spot on. Did I read a couple of years ago that some idiot journalist say that if we were to have VAR that Celtic should pay for it with Champions League money?

  • Eddie says:

    Absolutely agree with every word. Only got to look at last few games of that lot from Ibrox.

  • william kay says:

    I wrongly assumed the increase in televised games would have got rid of the bias but it didn’t seem to bother the Black Masons one little bit. They just carried on as normal and still do to this day. VAR will be run by the said same peepul and nothing will change.

  • Sid says:

    Using the word ‘conspiracy’, is their go to retort. A means to ridicule and close down debate.
    It’s when we realise it was never about conspiracy or collusion- which would have been harder to hide over the decades.
    It’s about flooding the ranks of the refereeing fraternity with people who were brought up like Gordon Smith- to view his old school team’s contemporary Catholic school opponents as ‘the enemy’.
    As long as enough referees are of a certain background, split on natural demographics of the country- then 4 out of 5 of them are more likely to be non- Catholic and less likely to be Celtic supporters as kids. From there you only have to let nature take it’s course during games and the overall desired result is achieved.
    They are also fond of using the word integrity, without ever asking why people like Jim Farry would risk their jobs just to stymie one club? Or why a person capable of his actions was never suspected of bias- all the way to the TOP of our game.
    Equally, not much was ever made of why Campbell Ogilvie was parachuted into the top job just as DOS/ EBT schemes he SET UP at Ibrox were about to see that club liquidated. Surely any due diligence of his appointment would have at least seen it questioned given this ridiculous conflict of interest.

    VAR can be a step in the right direction- but having referees declare an interest re- ‘boyhood team’, as with the rest of Europe, would be far better. Then, at least, the process of selection for matches would be transparent were it to throw up anomalies.

  • SSMPM says:

    I think declaring their team of choice is wrong in isolation and I think the introduction of VAR is wrong in isolation. Same with a level of accountability when the refs make wrong decisions. We should have brought in refs from other countries a long time ago but refuse to even consider that.
    I share my workplace with a number of men and women that are foreign nationals and they are good at their jobs so why not the same with refs. Brexit? We need all of these measures and more. Programmes like sportscene show selective incidents and at they same time don’t show selective issues, so my worries here are who selects what is watched, who decides its worth the ref having another look and what happens with that decision and that decision maker if clearly still wrong.
    The trouble is the decision makers are not going to do it because it will be harder to cheat in support of their racist club and earn an honest pound. HH

  • Quinny says:

    We have a New Club Sevco rainjurs claiming to be the same Club that went bust , with 55 league titles and 150 years Old …. so what makes you think the Brotherhood won”t blatantly continue to favour the Funny Peepul with dodgy decisions using the new Technology ? WE NEED INDEPENDENT TECHNICIANS IN CHARGE OF THE DECISIONS NOT THE BROTHERHOOD , but it will never happen , the corrupt SFA will make sure they control the Technology .

  • John Love says:

    Do not know what to say…you covered it quite well.

  • John says:

    Agree absolutely with Sid but feel VAR won’t make a great deal of difference unless it’s monitored by independent ( not Scottish) referees otherwise it will be the same old honest mistakes.Not going to happen

  • Paul Aurige says:

    I think you miss out on the issues of gross incompetence as well as straightforward corruption. I refer you to the incidents regarding Scottish referees Foote and Gordon in European and World Cup fixtures. Just check their records on Wikipedia and look at a Celtic – Rangers fixture from 1978 at Ibrox. It might explain a great deal.

  • Paul Aurige says:

    Apologies – for the Ian Foote story check Thierry Roland – Ian Foote on Wikipedia. You won’ t need a great command of French to catch the gist.

  • kirikocho blazes says:

    What happened at the start of last season when the Linesman got bloodied at the Huns end. He got hit with summit thrown from the crowd, right? But nothing ever came of it! Swept under the masonic carpet! Nothing from SFA on it! Maybe disgusted it on Supersportscenes and maybe they felt that due justice was well served! VAR? Very At odds with ouR policy?

Comments are closed.