It doesn’t bother me that Keevins is criticising Celtic after the weekend; we deserve a bit of stick for a dreadful performance. It does bother me that he’s talking utter balls when he does it. He says that Ange was complacent and felt he could stick any team out there to win the game. This is typical of this idiot, applying his tiny brain to a problem much larger than it.
“I may be simplistic,” he says. Yeah, now we’ve got to the root of it alright.
Ange made nine changes for Ross County and we won that one. The Celtic squad was built for rotation. It’s the whole purpose of having two men for every position. Sometimes things don’t go your way on the day; is every manager guilty of complacency when they don’t win?
There is literally no starting eleven in our squad which should not have been good enough to win that game. On another day we would won comfortably. There was clearly something wrong at the weekend but to simply apply idiot logic to it as he’s done here brings nobody a step closer to understanding exactly what the problem was.
The whole performance was off, both by the players who play every week and those who were brought in for this match.
It had damn all to do with arrogance or complacency. It was one of those days.
I can’t stand this guy. That’s no secret.
I can’t stand him because his career is a fraud. He is one of the most clueless individuals ever to sit in a commentary booth and his written work wouldn’t get him a gig on a school newspaper. His lack of understanding of tactics, of strategy, his utter absence of general knowledge about the sport he’s meant to cover is embarrassing.
Imagine this joker critiquing the Celtic boss.
How dare he even try.