Celtic Fans Were Smart Enough Never To Have Flirted With Fantasies Of Chris Davies.

Image for Celtic Fans Were Smart Enough Never To Have Flirted With Fantasies Of Chris Davies.

Regular readers will know that it’s my considered opinion that Ibrox has lived in the shadow of mad fantasy and unreality for a long time now. When their fans or their board or their favourite pundits are trying to analyse something they do it in a manner more akin to how politicians spin things than with a scientific method built on solid foundations.

This leads to mistakes. Sometimes small ones, with only modest effects. Sometimes to larger problems, and occasionally catastrophic ones.

I believe their latest mistake is potentially serious. They have bought into the crazy idea that Steven Gerrard was only a showy frontman, and that the “brains of the operation” was in Michael Beale. In short, they think they’re getting the benefits of Gerrard’s management style without him. That those “benefits” were dubious in the first place is only half important here.

Where did this barmy idea come from? Last night my old man joked that Belgium haven’t been the same since Shaun Maloney left his job; it’s true, but isn’t there a significant risk here? The Latin phrase Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc comes to mind.

It means “after it, therefore because of it.” It’s an example of faulty thinking, what’s literally called Post Hoc fallacy.

It assumes that because one thing happened after something else that the second thing was caused by the first. Belgium’s loss of form was not caused by the departure of Shaun Maloney. Anyone concluding that it was might fool themselves into imagining that it was him, not Roberto Martinez, who was the architect of their rise through the world rankings.

And that’s the crazy delusional that Ibrox fans have allowed themselves to stumble towards, with this assertion that it was Beale, not Gerrard, who made the trains run on time across the city. If their board genuinely believed that why didn’t they offer Beale the promotion when they were all preparing to leave in the first place?

There were some points during the Rodgers era where I heard Celtic fans suggest that perhaps the real brains of the operation was Chris Davies. I get where these ideas come from. There are a lot of organisations where the showy front-man is there to add a little glitz and glamour to proceedings whereas the real work is done by some diligent guy behind the scenes.

I am sure that these guys exist in football, but not at top clubs. Guys who are that smart – and what we’d effectively be saying is that Davies is a better coach than Rodgers – do tend to become bosses in their own right, and some of them, like Mourinho, have gone on to be exceptional at it. For the most part, the man out front is the man who brings success.

This is where Ibrox fans think they’re onto something with Beale. Because he has now stepped up to become a manager they think that their theory was right all along, that he was the real driver of the Gerrard era at the club. But this is another example of the Post Hoc fallacy. These guys worked as a team, in the same way Rodgers and Davies did.

This theory isn’t new. It stalked Brian Clough in those periods of his career where he didn’t have Peter Taylor with him. But Taylor’s time apart from Clough didn’t produce the sort of results one would expect if he had been the true genius all along.

Celtic fans never seriously entertained the idea that we could hire Davies and have Rodgers Lite. Our club certainly never considered it as possibility. But if we had, the theory would at least have been backed up by a period of unbelievable success.

What’s truly bizarre about the Ibrox fans embrace of this nuttiness is that they are ready to ascribe to Beale all the positive aspects and blame Gerrard for the negative ones. Which is ludicrous. As a team, their record was actually awful. Zero domestic cup competitions in six attempts. One league title in a year of exceptional circumstances.

People talked about European credibility being restored; the same management team presided over the Malmo debacle, where they lost the second leg at home playing against ten men. They were floundering in their Europa League group when Van Bronckhorst took over, swung it around and somehow made the final of that competition.

Still, they cling to the notion that the Gerrard era was a success and that it was Michael Beale who made it a success, and not the man who spoke to the media every other week. On some level they must know all this is ridiculous. On some level they must all realise that it flies in the face of logic and even perhaps sanity … but they persist regardless.

No other club’s supporters are so good at hiding amidst comforting lies than facing hard truths. The thing is, the comforting lies always lead them towards disaster. The hard truths might prepare them better for hard times.

Share this article


  • Johnny Green says:

    Beale will huff and puff and do his best to catch Celtic, but with no bullets in his gun he will fail miserably. Ange has the financial backing of the Club and is now part of a well oiled machine, he can take everything in his stride effortlessly. We won’t even have to glance in our rear view mirror, for no one is there.

  • Benjamin says:

    James, I think this is harsh. Rangers improved dramatically from the time Gerrard showed up to the time he left. While there weren’t a lot of trophies, they were respectable at the end which is a far cry from the laughingstock they were when he was appointed.

    As for Beale/Gerrard, I think we’re on safe ground in saying that Gerrard wasn’t the brains in that operation. He’s an excellent man-manager and great at motivating his players to get the most out of them. Players respected him because of what he accomplished as a player himself. But a tactical savant he was not. That was Beale’s job, both at Rangers and then at Villa. It’s not for nothing that Gerrard got canned shortly after Beale left and at a time when Beale’s new club was in first place.

    I’m not going to pretend that this appointment is going to work (it won’t), but it’s also not some hope-and-prayer punt with nothing going for it. Beale is actually pretty good at least one aspect of what it takes to be a successful manager. He’ll fail because he doesn’t have the rest of the tools and he’s been put into an impossible situation at Rangers. Half the squad is injured and most of the rest have one foot out the door. There’s not a manager anywhere in football that can turn that group of misfits into winners, and the board isn’t going to give him the funds a (successful) full rebuild would require. He’s going to have to catch Celtic with EPL rejects and spare parts, and that’s not a winning formula.

  • Seppington says:

    You have to be sane to understand what sanity is and I don’t believe you can be sane if you support that disgusting klub…

Comments are closed.