Celtic Will Not Be Forced To A Green Brigade Climbown By “Day Of Action” Threats.

Soccer Football - Scottish Cup Final - Celtic v Inverness Caledonian Thistle - Hampden Park, Glasgow, Scotland, Britain - June 3, 2023 Celtic fans celebrate after Liel Abada scores their second goal Action Images via Reuters/Lee Smith

There is a wonderful scene in The Social Network, the brilliant movie about Facebook, written by Aaron Sorkin of The West Wing, when Jesse Eisenberg’s Mark Zuckerburg is in a deposition (he’s being sued from ripping the idea off) and he’s staring out of the window when the lawyer on the other side of the desk asks him, “Mr Zuckerburg … do I have your full attention?”

I have no idea if the exchange that follows is taken from official transcripts or if Sorkin conjured it out of thin air, and I don’t know if Zuckerburg is, or ever was, capable of such condescension and contempt as Eisenberg musters for his reply, but I get a kick out of the scene.

“I swore an oath before I began this deposition and I don’t want to perjure myself,” he says. “There’s no requirement that I enjoy sitting here listening to people lie. You have part of my attention. The minimum amount.”

That’s a little like how I felt when I read The Green Brigade’s latest statement, and the one put out by that other Celtic fan group whose name I have to constantly Google so that I remember it.

Nevertheless, I get that this is an important subject, so let’s be real about it.

The talk now is of a Day Of Action; I have an idea. How about this action? That they all get together, those of them able to attend the game, and go and watch the team?

A Day Of Action. To do what?

Because if they expect people to support this idea then they need to have an answer to that question. When you take action in the manner they’re talking about, there has to be a specific objective. So what is the objective?

To send a message? Wow.

I’ve been part of so many political campaigns down through the years which were designed to “send a message.” And you know what message almost all of them have sent? The one that says “we’ve got no real power here so we’re sending you a message.” Which in 99% of cases is one that those in authority simply ignore.

So, before you start, the objective has to be clearly defined and if you’re asking people to join it then that has to be something effective, and where its success or failure is measurable. I don’t see what that could possibly be in this case.

Right from the start, I’ve thought that The Green Brigade strategy of challenging the board was self-indulgent madness to nobody’s benefit. See, on the subject of pyro, where for a lot of people this thing began, their position has been manifestly ridiculous; the club should be willing to ignore the law, or to help them to break it.

And I keep on hearing how “it’s here to stay” and wondering how anybody can believe that position is acceptable.

If the police start searching everyone trying to get into a ground, causing massive inconvenience, how much support for that position will there still be? Less and less every week until it’s virtually zero. If the SFA passes strict liability and starts threatening to shut sections of the ground or deduct points, how sustainable is that position?

See, all through this one thing has been obvious; if the people in charge decide to get tough, this stuff will disappear almost overnight, or those who do it will suffer an ever-escalating series of consequences until it’s gone.

The trouble with Standing Up To The Man is that too many people don’t think through the power The Man has at his disposal if he decides to make an example out of you. To spit in his face when, really, he’s in the right is just lunacy.

If you’ll allow me a second movie quote, this one is from The Untouchables; it comes when Malone asks Elliot Ness how he intends to bring down Capone. “What are you prepared to do?” he asks. And when Ness gives him what he thinks is the right answer, Malone asks him “And then what are you prepared to do?”

And that’s the rub here.

I like a good campaign.

But you know what makes a good campaign?

A clear objective and an obvious path to victory. Otherwise, it’s pointless. You can’t have an obvious path to victory without the clear objective being outlined first, and if the objective is virtually impossible to achieve then there never will be a real road towards securing it, will there?

One thing is clear now; all the artifice has been ripped away and we’re left with the naked struggle for power. The Green Brigade statement makes it clear that all it is concerned with is being allowed back to Celtic Park on its own terms, a position which is patently ludicrous. They have given the club an ultimatum.

So all the pretence about Palestine and everything else has been cast aside; this is about Them versus The Club and they want wider support.

They can say all they like about this being about the general running of the club; they don’t really care about that, and the statement admits it. This is about Them. They are willing to ditch the idea entirely if they get what they want.

If this was about wider issues, if it was about the general state of things at Celtic (top of the league, defending two trophies, financially strong) then they’d be digging in for the long haul. But their list of demands really boils down to one.

And that’s where The Untouchables quote comes in, and that’s why this Day Of Action is a terrible move, born of weakness and not strength, and incapable of changing anything.

Because even if there was a clear objective here which most people were able to sympathise with – and “let us back in but don’t expect us to change” isn’t that – even if the cause was just and the club itself didn’t suffer, these guys face the same challenge every campaign eventually does.

People lose interest. People move on.

To be effective, A Day Of Action needs to be tied to a wider campaign, and who can be bothered with that?

A campaign in support of The Green Brigade’s right to act as it will?

You couldn’t find five thousand season ticket holders willing to join that; as long as the team is winning and we’re sitting at the top of the league few are going to care.

Even if you got that five thousand, and you asked them to “stand up for The Green Brigade” on the 10th minute or something, as a one-off gesture it’s useless.

Ask them to do it every week and the number who will be prepared to will drop game on game until there are a tiny handful left, and the rest of the ground will scorn them.

And I picked a very frivolous, very easy to do, action there.

The more you ask of people, the smaller that initial buy-in and the greater the drop-off every week until only a tiny hardcore remain.

Which brings you to Malone’s question again; so you’ve made your point, but then what are you prepared to do?

For most people, the answer will be the one it always is; not a Hell of a lot.

Even when the issue is life and death, most people have their own lives, their own concerns, their own priorities and it’s hard to get them to sustain themselves through a major campaign. And let’s be honest, this isn’t worth it for most folk.

Most people just want to watch their team, and even those who recognise that there are issues with the board and the way the club is run aren’t going to join a wider campaign when, in fact, Celtic is arguably well run and demonstrably successful with it.

That’s going to make any sort of sustained campaign nothing but an irritant to many, many fans.

This matter is winding to a close, that’s the reality.

Celtic has done exactly what so many of us have been predicting since these people first locked horns with the club, and the only way out of this lies with those who have been banned going to the club and promising to behave.

Short of that, The Green Brigade is finished, whatever its handful of members tell themselves.

They have not identified an achievable goal far less a roadmap for how to get there, and their threats about A Day Of Action will not make a negotiated settlement easier, if anyone at the moment was in the mood for any such thing.

What it has done is bring the end of this closer … but not in the way they intend.

Exit mobile version