Why Can’t Celtic Capitalise On, Or Defend, Dead Ball Situations?

Soccer Football - Champions League - Group E - Celtic v Atletico Madrid - Celtic Park, Glasgow, Scotland, Britain - October 25, 2023 Celtic's Callum McGregor applauds fans after the match REUTERS/Russell Cheyne

Yesterday, we saw two familiar things happen at Celtic Park, and it cost us two points and the chance to extend our lead over the club from Ibrox. We failed to make the best of a plethora of set-piece opportunities and, as has become depressingly familiar, we conceded from an easily defensible one. When it comes to this stuff, across three different managers in the last eight years, we are hopeless. Dead ball situations seem to frazzle our brains.

In an effort to add something new to the game, Football Manager this year, in its annual effort to justify itself as more than just a data upgrade, added a brand new set-piece system, including the introduction of set-piece coaches. It has changed the way I play the game … sort of anyway. I do score more goals from corners than ever before.

I don’t know if set-piece coaches actually exist, or if this is some interesting new affectation the game has run with, but I know that if they do, we don’t have one and that we badly need to get one in. Because this long since became ridiculous, this long since revealed itself a problem and it is one that, glaring though it is, we have yet to fix.

In this, we might be victims of our own success. We regularly blaze past opponents without difficulty, and when you are doing that and scoring so many goals from open play you don’t need to focus as much attention as you might on those dead ball situations. And when your opponents are content to play for a point with less than 20% of the ball it seems to matter even less.

But that’s the sort of complacency which leads to moments like that one yesterday, when Motherwell, with virtually their only meaningful chance, converted from a corner. For all the corners we had and which we did nothing with, they capitalised on theirs, as many of us feared they would when they got it so quickly after our goal.

If dead ball situations – including penalties; don’t even get me started on that – can get you a dozen goals over the course of a season, that’s surely worth working on? If it can prevent you conceding even half of that, in a close title race, that could be what gets you over the line. So really, whether or not people at Celtic think we “need” this … do you not want that insurance policy? Is it not something you should have in the back pocket, just in case?

The thing, when we get to Europe this stuff is punished even more readily than in Scotland. How many dead-ball goals have we lost on our continental travels? You would think for those games we would want every advantage we could get … but I see no evidence at all that we work on this stuff with any regularity, or to any net effect.

Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe the Celtic stats guys will crunch some numbers for us and show me the error of my ways. But a lot of people I’ve spoken to have highlighted this same issue, and so I’m not the only one who thinks so. As a percentage of chances we get, our results seem piss-poor to say the least. Of the number of chances our opponents get, I would bet the percentage that end in a goal is much, much higher. With the number of chances we create, and thus corners and free kicks around the box, we should be scoring these in a recognisable pattern.

We aren’t. And we continue to concede them. Regularly.

So there’s a clear need for something in this area. Soon.

Exit mobile version