This morning, Michael Gannon of the Daily Record published an article suggesting that Celtic has a contingency plan in place for the potential sale of Matt O’Riley.
Now, under normal circumstances people might be wondering why I’d take that seriously.
It’s the writer’s name. Coming from Gannon, this should not easily be dismissed, as he is known to be close to the club and generally has some insight into what’s going on behind the scenes.
It’s reassuring to think that Celtic has a plan, and that plan appears to involve the Belgian midfielder at Augsburg, Arne Engels.
This is an exciting development, if true.
Most of us assumed that the sale of O’Riley, while it would generate substantial funds, wouldn’t see Celtic replacing him like-for-like, as we’ve rarely done so in the past. But Engels is the real deal. He’s a player who fits the bill in terms of his age profile, style of play, and overall reputation in the game.
This would align with Brendan Rodgers’ policy of aiming for a higher calibre of player, even if that player is still relatively young.
The days of taking £2-3 million punts might be coming to an end.
Gannon’s article also states that Celtic has no interest in, or intention of, selling Reo Hatate.
This shouldn’t surprise anyone, as a club rebuilding its midfield would have planned well in advance.
The groundwork for that would be well underway, and no one would leave it until the last two weeks of the transfer window. While I may have my disagreements with how the club conducts business at times, I don’t believe for a second that we would ever do something as self-defeating as that.
So, overall, the article is encouraging.
It suggests that the manager has full control and autonomy, laying down the law on a series of issues, and ensuring that his approach to transfer business will prevail in the final 11 days of the window. I can’t express enough enthusiasm if that proves to be the case.
There’s always been a sense that the club was waiting to spend real money and ramp up its transfer dealings only after Matt O’Riley was ushered out the door.
When you think about it, it’s not completely crazy, especially when you consider that we knew we were going to have to spend around £12 million on two signings just to bring us back to the strength we had at the end of the last campaign.
I said this many months ago, to the scorn of many who refused to believe it.
I told those people that it’s a lot of money to spend just to stand still, and our club would need to be very careful if it did so. I said it would severely eat into the manager’s available budget, and of course it has.
Rodgers still has money to spend, of course. There’s still plenty of cash in the kitty. But as I said yesterday, high-profile players are more likely to come on a loan with an option to buy or an obligation to buy basis, rather than arriving for major transfer fees unless O’Riley leaves.
I still have an inkling that he’ll stay, but Brighton have the cash and the ambition to make this happen and I would not consider it unbelievable if he was interested, because they have a seriously good player development record and their policies are spot on.
So this could happen. I hope we keep Matt, but I see that there’s a downside to that if we really want to go for top tier players in the time that is left. The manager will certainly have more latitude to spend big, and I have to think that this isn’t the only area of the pitch where plans are already made and ready to execute.
The bigger plans have likely always depended on the sale of O’Riley, and those at the club probably expected that to happen much sooner in the window.
The only way we’ll find out is if Matt goes, and we then spend the kind of money we’re talking about here.
Gannon seems to think that we will. Gannon seems to believe that’s the plan. And as I said, he tends to have good relationships with people inside Celtic, so while it’s not something we can take to the bank, it makes a certain kind of sense.
One way or another, these next 11 days are going to be extremely interesting.
It’s not ideal that it’s going to be a sprint, but for a moment, let’s set aside the doom and gloom of the last two months, the anger and negativity that we’ve all felt—justified as it was—and consider the impact on the whole club if we end up going out and doing serious business in these final days, showing some real intent.
And while you’re tantalising yourself with that thought, think on this: think about the impact that would have across the city; on their club, players, fans, and coaching staff. That could be the spark that makes the whole bomb go off.
The Chinese say, “May you live in interesting times”; it’s not a blessing, it’s a curse.
At Ibrox, they live permanently in interesting times, but these might be the most interesting yet.
We’ve already created a problem for them that’s almost insoluble.
If we, in the next 11 days, decide to really flex our muscles, that’s more than just a problem—that’s Armageddon.
Anything in The Daily Record… Nope definitely not for me of it – Pally crayon scrawler of Poker Pete and Lord Lucan-Nicholson or not !
Celtic FC and her supporters should not trust that gruesome organisation with a barge pole !
So, to conclude…….we have about £100M in the bank but the Board are waiting to sell a player for big money before they are willing to sanction the signing of any decent players?!
Does anyone else think this Board are a disgrace, have zero ambition and have taken incompetence to a whole new level? Major profit warning on this transfer window incoming! World record bonuses on the way too! Just keep ploughing money into Club though. The Board are more than happy to mug us all off.
And the happy clappers are still insisting that Lawwell isn’t responsible, despite all evidence the contrary.
Interestin post and if there’s anythin in it, ah would agree that it’s encouragin. Tho, why the continual less-encouragin, deflatin, disrespectful silence we get from this board every season. Without givin too much away, all they have tae dae, is come out with a statement tae our supporters, with an assurance that they will be strengthenin our team. A team that would put up a challenge in Europe and no just domestically. Surely, a simple respectful, gesture like that from the board theirselves, tae show some gratitude, along with ambition, as the support are the ones who keep the money floodin in. It’s the very least our support deserve, for their continual loyalty.
“The days of taking £2-3 million punts might be coming to an end.c
I’d question that James or, at least, qualify it. If Celtic are, indeed, putting these sort of plans together then it is only because of one thing. A glut of money in the bank. That glut of money is largely down to qualification of the CL group stages. Qualification to that stage of the competition is down to automatic placement of the Scottish Champions. As of next season, that isn’t happening and is unlikely to return any time soon.
That doesn’t mean we won’t qualify but it will be a tough ride. Hopefully by putting these plans in place, we will have a squad ready to take on the challenge and put up a much better showing than those Liebrox jokers did last week. But, also, a much better showing than we have any time we have tried in recent times.
But we all know it’s a lottery and if you get a tough draw then you are toast. Guaranteed if that happens, we will be back to the days of £2-3M punts.
Last seasons CL draw was as good a draw we’ve had in years and due tae the boards unwillingness tae strengthen properly, even that was a failure. They need tae show the support they have some sort if ambition beyond the domestic.
“The days of taking £2-3 million punts might be coming to an end.”
You mean like the punts we took on Larsson, Lubo, Mjalby, Van Dyke, Wanyama and lots, lots more.
Keep on punting I say……it’s worth the gamble.
When you are going back over 20 years with 3 of the players that you mentioned in order to make a point then you are sounding foolish.
How long ago was that then?
Ever heard of inflation ?
20 years ago we were spending 4/5/6 £million for players.
Then came the Lawwell years. We’re still ferreting about in the bargain basement.
The £9.5m for Idah is an outlier, we were forced into paying it because a) Brendan wanted him and b) the Board shat it when Kyogo went down on his shoulder last week with no other striker left at Parkhead.
Even paying 6/8 £m nowadays is still less than 20 years ago adjusted for inflation.
Surely the abada money in January and the oh money covers the idah and the bernardo deals this summer.
If O’Riley leaves we will sign only one player, the board will say it was to late in the day to get things done like they have in the past, rinse and repeat Mr lawells mantra