Articles

Kasper Schmeichel Shows Us What Celtic’s Transfer Policy And Window Ought To Be.

|
Image for Kasper Schmeichel Shows Us What Celtic’s Transfer Policy And Window Ought To Be.

Amidst all the doom and gloom surrounding Celtic’s transfer window so far, there is one deal that still brings a smile. It shows us what this club can be and, more importantly, it proves the lie that quality players won’t come to Scotland.

That deal, of course, is the one that brought Kasper Schmeichel here.

Kasper Schmeichel exemplifies what our transfer policy could—and should—be. Concerns about resale value? They’re irrelevant.

Whether or not we can turn a profit on him isn’t the point. The value of Schmeichel lies in what he brings to the starting XI and the dressing room. These are the kinds of intangibles that you can’t put a price on, even if our board tries to.

Schmeichel undoubtedly had other options. Even if there wasn’t interest from England—though there certainly was—or elsewhere in Europe, he could’ve gone somewhere else, probably the Far East or the US, and earned a massive salary as a marquee signing, coasting through the rest of his career in a football backwater. But he chose Celtic.

He won’t be paid as much at Celtic Park as he could’ve been elsewhere, but those other deals wouldn’t have given him what our club can: the chance to play in front of fantastic supporters, the opportunity to win more titles and trophies, and the chance to compete at the highest level in the Champions League.

Don’t listen to a single word the naysayers tell you about how Celtic isn’t an attractive option for top players; it is a lie. It’s a lie perpetuated by a board of directors trying to justify an increasingly indefensible policy.

Kasper Schmeichel disproves all of it.

He is unequivocally a Brendan Rodgers signing, and he shows us what a Brendan Rodgers transfer policy might look like. What Rodgers says about Schmeichel reflects his overall philosophy and outlook for this club. Schmeichel brings experience, wisdom, leadership—qualities that inspire the dressing room and set a fantastic example for our younger players.

We’ve also signed our own young goalkeeper, and no matter how good our coaching is or how much we throw him in at the deep end, the smartest move we’ve made in this window—or in any window for a while—is bringing in a top-class performer like Schmeichel to mentor him.

He’ll learn more walking alongside Schmeichel, getting advice from someone who’s been at the top of the game for most of his career, than he ever would being thrown into the deep end or playing second fiddle to someone less experienced.

That gravitas, that experience—that’s what Rodgers thinks should be spread across the team.

When we sign too many project players, we waste money. Rodgers wasn’t going to risk his job or our season by throwing them in before they were ready and there were too many of them for any kind of coherent one-on-one coaching or mentor-mentee relationships.

If we bring in a player with the long-term goal of him one day filling Callum McGregor’s shoes, that’s doable and feasible. But he needs to have McGregor as a role model, so he can shadow him, and learn from him. You can develop a player that way.

But if your policy is scattershot—bringing in five players and hoping one can do that—you’re not just wasting four of them, you’re wasting all of them. None will develop that crucial one-on-one relationship; none will have that pupil-teacher bond.

Rodgers knows this team needs more teachers, not more pupils.

A few more steady, seasoned pros with something to teach would do more for this squad than a dozen young prospects with lots to learn. It’s astonishing that the board doesn’t grasp this simple concept, and frustrating that some of our fans don’t see the need for it either.

The real frustration with this window is how little it actually needed to deliver in terms of numbers. This team didn’t need a full-scale rebuild.

If we’d gone out at the start of the window and signed Schmeichel, Idah and Bernardo we’d only need a left-back, a centre-back, a backup striker, and a solid central midfielder and we’d be looking at a very decent squad. Four experienced footballers—four players with gravitas—could’ve raised us that little bit higher.

Kasper Schmeichel, and all the talk about what he’s already brought to the dressing room and the club, is the poster boy for what this window could have been.

Share this article

0 comments

  • Clachnacuddin and the Hoops says:

    Great signing is Schmicheal… More of the same please… Though I’m not holding my breath on that happening !

  • Lubo's Boots says:

    Couldn’t have put it better.

  • Captain Swing says:

    In a similar vein, bringing back Stuart Armstrong as a free agent would make total sense as a further goal threat from midfield, particularly if O’Riley is sold. On a one year contract with the option of a second – not a golden handshake deal like the inexplicable contract given to McCarthy – as an established EPL midfielder he’d be the ideal support to McGregor and to help bring on our young midfielders. To anyone complaining “he’s too auld” I would point towards the signings of Lubo Moravcik, Billy Stark and Pat Stanton (OK, going back a bit with those).

    A signing like that would make so much sense there’s no chance of it happening!!!

  • James Garrity says:

    More than happy with the Schmeichel signing, but not sure we should be signing too many players pushing 38. He’s a goalkeeper, of course, so that’s different. And he has a previous connection with BR. So all good.
    But to hold this up as a model going forward is a bit of a stretch. Although, Jamie Vardy is pushing 38 too.

  • Joe McQuaid says:

    Sorry James – way off point, but finally caught with Sportscene from Tynecastle last week. Leaving the penalty discussion to one side, two standouts for me from the managers. PC said afterwards he didn’t learn anything about his players (really – I find that an extraordinary admission) and Neilson’s references to “both teams” doing this, that and tother…very odd, surely you focus on your team…maybe he was just exhibiting his confusion over which was his …

  • Droopy McCool says:

    A 37 year old has-been on a 1 year contract, who’s older than our last keeper? Ha!!! Just kidding, before you go off on one and call me names, best possible replacement we could’ve got for the magnificent Joe. I do hope your blood started boiling just a tad though.

  • 18871888 says:

    As I’ve argued before, we’d have more chance of signing quality players if we could promise them a team that would be in Europe post Christmas, even if it was the Europa, a tournament which we would have a good chance of winning, with a bit of luck. That kind of thinking could engender a virtuous cycle of better players getting better results, getting better players, ad infinitum. ‘Course, you’d need a board capable of seeing that.

  • Eddie McKelveys Capri says:

    His presence shows the attributes and value you mention.
    His way of getting here shows the complete incompetence of Celtic and the decision makers of the club. Schmeichel was phoned after the Euros by Celtic! Despite knowing they needed a gk since February and Schmeichel was out of contract. Shocking. Incompetence beyond comparison in a £100m turnover business…..

Comments are closed.