Articles

Jackson’s Rodgers piece displays again his startling ignorance of the game he writes about.

|
Image for Jackson’s Rodgers piece displays again his startling ignorance of the game he writes about.
Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty Images

Let’s start by acknowledging this: Jackson’s piece today is hardly worth the full treatment. It’s so lacklustre that there’s barely any traction to be had from dissecting it. But there is one particular claim that stands out as especially ludicrous, and that deserves a proper response.

His article, centred around Brendan Rodgers and what he calls a “Messiah complex.”

It is a prime example of the nonsense that gets thrown at Rodgers by certain sections of the media. I don’t believe for a second that Rodgers suffers from any such delusions, but it’s exactly the kind of narrative spun by hacks who are eager to view him through a jaundiced lens.

The real kicker comes when Jackson references a 5-2 win Rodgers secured while managing Leicester City against Manchester City, which is indeed an impressive victory. After all, we’re talking about a side that’s dominated English football for nearly a decade.

However, Jackson takes this one isolated incident and tries to stretch it into evidence that Rodgers can change tactics on the fly. Then he poses the rather naive question: if Rodgers can do it for that game, why doesn’t he do it in Europe?

It’s a juvenile question at best, and outright idiotic if we’re being less generous.

Jackson clearly doesn’t grasp what he’s talking about. Rodgers actually touched on something in his Friday press conference that offers a bit of context. He said that the way Celtic play isn’t something you can just switch on and off. That’s a crucial point, and while it might escape the understanding of a casual football fan, a sports writer should get it. Unfortunately, we have some of the worst in the business, so it’s no surprise they don’t.

Rodgers is absolutely right.

It’s the same in any sport—when you commit to a certain style of play, every aspect of your training and preparation is geared towards that system. Think of a boxer trying to change his fighting style. Now imagine doing that for an entire football team. You’re training players day in, day out to perform intricate patterns of movement, high pressing, and positional awareness, all underpinned by discipline and repetition. You can’t just throw that out the window and expect them to seamlessly adopt a completely different approach overnight.

It can be done. You can drill teams in two different approaches. Rodgers has proved that he can do it at Celtic; look how many games we won in his first tenure with ten men on the pitch, including that remarkable victory at Ibrox when Edouard got the winner.

But Rodgers is correct in saying you can’t simply turn the kind of football we play on and off at will. It is much, much more complicated than that.

To have a team capable of playing two distinct tactical systems, you’d need to drill them constantly in both. That’s not easy, and it’s certainly not something that can be mastered without consistent practice in games that matter.

I do think it would be in Celtic’s best interests to explore a more defensive setup from time to time, but expecting it to work flawlessly from the off is unrealistic. The team wasn’t built for it, and the players’ natural instincts are in direct opposition to that kind of football. It would take time to make it work, and until then, we’d look like ducks out of water.

Jackson also completely misses the context of that Leicester-Man City match. Let’s not forget, Leicester City, although they famously won the Premier League in one of the most astonishing campaigns we’ve ever seen, were not exactly a team built to slug it out with the elite.

Rodgers hadn’t trained them to be one.

That 5-2 win over City didn’t require a tactical overhaul. Leicester was already used to playing a counter-attacking style, which is exactly what they did in that game. It didn’t take a dramatic tactical revolution to pull it off.

Rodgers is, in fact, a more sophisticated coach than Ange Postecoglou. His track record is more varied, and his career more complex. Unlike Ange, who has largely stuck to one style of football, Rodgers has shown flexibility throughout his managerial career. He made notable tactical shifts several times in a single season at Liverpool, for example. It’s one of the reasons he’s been successful at so many different clubs.

But note that I said “tactical shifts.” What Jackson is talking about is not a tactical shift, it is a stylistic change and that is much more difficult to pull off.

It is completely feasible that Rodgers could teach this Celtic team to play a more defensive, pragmatic style if necessary. In fact, I think we might see something along those lines in the upcoming game against Atalanta. He’s too savvy to go into that match playing high-press, front-foot football and risk another heavy defeat. But the changes won’t be drastic, and they won’t be immediately obvious. His lineup will probably look very familiar.

Of course, there are deeper issues here than just Rodgers’ tactics.

I’ve touched on the coaching setup in a previous article, and in the next, I’ll discuss something else that’s not immediately apparent—personnel issues within the squad that make it challenging for us to adopt a more defensive style.

For now, though, let’s just acknowledge what we’re dealing with here.

Jackson, as usual, displays a severe lack of understanding when it comes to football. This is a guy who has covered the game for most of his life and still doesn’t seem to have cracked open a single book on coaching or tactics. It’s not enough for him to sit there and claim that none of us have ever managed a Champions League team, as if that’s some great defence of his ignorance.

Sure, none of us are Champions League managers.

But some of us have taken the time to educate ourselves on the fundamentals of the game so we can actually understand what we’re watching and writing about. I’m sorry that he hasn’t, but it’s not surprising.

Too many in the Scottish media are fundamentally lazy. They don’t do their research, they don’t strive to understand the game in any real depth, and yet they feel qualified to lecture our manager on how to run his team. It’s laughable.

Our friends at Endless Celts have been nominated at the Football Content Awards, in the Best International Podcast section. Please show them your support by clicking on this link and giving them your vote. The Endless Celts guys are a hard working team of passionate fans who deserve recognition and the highest praise.

Share this article

James Forrest has been the editor of The CelticBlog for 13 years. Prior to that, he was the editor of several digital magazines on subjects as diverse as Scottish music, true crime, politics and football. He ran the Scottish football site On Fields of Green and, during the independence referendum, the Scottish politics site Comment Isn't Free. He's the author of one novel, one book of short stories and one novella. He lives in Glasgow.

7 comments

  • DannyGal says:

    Agreed James, he writes that stuff without proper research.
    I prefer listening to players or ex players’ opinions on the subject, as they would know what it takes to suddenly change their style.
    Brendan has made all his signings to play his version of “The Celtic Way”. As he’s a lifelong Celtic fan and that also happens to be his preferred style of football at any club he manages.
    One of the player/pundits whose comments I found interesting was Scott Allan. He agreed 100% with Brendan that you can’t just change everything you’ve been working on from the start of the close season and expect the players to adapt quickly and seemlessly. He did say though that they could tweak the system without making it an alien concept to the players. One example he gave was to have a deeper press in specific matches to close the space between defence and midfield, which is the area most exploited by those elite clubs with elite coaching and scouting departments.

  • Clachnacuddin and the Hoops says:

    Rodgers may well yet change his tactics in Atalanta…

    But The Scummy’s are the very last he’d admit that to and with good bloody reason at that…

    Can you imagine if Rodgers had said after Dortmund to any of The Scummy’s “Aye well you’ve got a valid point there – I might just take that on board”

    Cue the headlines of “He took the sage advice that this writer offered”

    Rodgers would rather drown in a ditch than be patronised like that by The Scummy’s –

    There is also the possibility that they know this and deliberately tried to pressurise him into not changing in the hope of another massacring in Atalanta…

    Yes – They are that evil and it’s the depths of Hell that they’d plummet to –

    Remember that always – Any Celtic Supporter ?? That has any intention of financially supporting that tramp and his ilk !

    • Michael Collins says:

      We could have brought Steve Clarke in as manager before Ange or Brendan if you wanted progress in Europe and you would not have got these European hammerings, still have won the league, but you would not have had the sort of football that you had with Brendan or Ange.
      James hit the nail on the head with this blog, about the sort of football we get with Brendan.
      You can enjoy all the high scoring high pressing football when the team is playing in Scotland, but you cannot play that way in Europe against the top teams or there will just be more hammerings.
      We just have to play it Brendans way as that is the way it has to be.

  • David Gillen says:

    Fantastic read

  • SSMPM says:

    Brendan’s setup for the last CL game was less of a Messiah and more of a naughty boy, one that refuses to change or modify his behaviour.
    I do hope he adapts the system to more of a gap filling structure to our midfield and defence, mindful of what we’re up against. We can’t really afford another goal fest again if we want to qualify to the next stage.
    Interestingly enough we did do City and Chelsea over pre season. It’s a funny auld game

  • Mark B says:

    It’s very clear. If we do not practice and play a more hard to beat style against the top teams expect several 7-1 5-0 4-0 or 6-0 defeats in CL. This is far from the first time. Barcelona Dortmund Atletico Real Madrid PSG. All scored five against us with a manager who said “we play our way” Four of those were under Brendan. Lennon Strachan at least figured out how to compete at this level. It’s sheer arrogance and stubbornness not to alter.

  • Mark B says:

    Also we have 100m in the bank and we do not have one class defensive midfielder in the squad. That needs rectifying. Calum is a legend but he is better attacking. We all know this. Brown, Lennon, Hay, Aitken, all knew how to breakup play. For years we had Collins and McStay but won little. They were brilliant but Peter Grant was not up to the job we all know this. We need a DM. Ute we can’t get Roy Keane at his peak but this is the sort of player we need for certain games.

Comments are closed.

×