GLASGOW, SCOTLAND - OCTOBER 25: A general view outside the stadium ahead of the UEFA Champions League match between Celtic FC and Atletico Madrid at Celtic Park Stadium on October 25, 2023 in Glasgow, Scotland. (Photo by Jan Kruger - UEFA/UEFA via Getty Images)
Tom English is not, as we know, a genius.
He’s another desperate BBC hack, one who is just as prone to swallowing Ibrox propaganda and spin as anyone in the mainstream press. But what makes English frustrating, above and beyond a lot of the others, is that he actually has a spark of talent—or so I’ve always believed.
Anyway, he’s capable of being a good writer. He’s capable of decent analysis, but only when he chooses to be.
His recent revelation that the club from Ibrox wants to be us should come as no surprise to anyone. This blog has said much the same thing countless times. And the more they talk about transfer trading strategies and all sorts of other things, the clearer it becomes—not only are we the club they aspire to be, but we’re bigger than David Murray ever wanted Rangers to be.
Albeit, he also thought that he could have European trophies as well. But in terms of domestic success, even at his pomp, he couldn’t do what we can.
It’s nice to have aspirations. It’s nice to look at someone else and hold them up as your role model. But I’m not going to be Stephen King, no matter how much I want to be. And the skill set required to become as good as someone else may not be a skill set that you possess. It may not be something that can be taught, trained, learned, or something you can easily grow into.
So yeah, it’s perfectly valid for them to want to be us, but in order to genuinely move in the direction of becoming us, I think it’s imperative that they understand us a little bit—that they recognise who we are and what it is that we do that makes us successful. And let’s be honest here—they don’t.
What’s worse is that they ascribe what we did partly to luck. And as long as they’re looking at it through that lens, they’re never going to catch us. They’re never going to replicate what it is that we’ve done. They refuse to accept that for us to get here, it took sacrifice. It took our club willingly deciding to give things up in the short term in order to get it right over a longer period of time.
And this is one of the real problems over there—because they don’t have the stomach for any kind of long-term thinking. And I’m not sure that bringing in these new people is going to do all that much good.
I’ll get to Barry Ferguson and the so-called Real Rangers Men Revolution later on today because it’s worth covering. But for the moment, it’s worth noting that no matter who is sitting in that boardroom, or the dugout, there will be a pervading sense around the club, and especially in the stands, that the surest way to catch us is to spend huge sums of money—even if that is unlikely, verging on impossible.
The notion that sometimes you have to go back to go forward is one that doesn’t even dawn on these people. The idea that you may have to voluntarily set aside ambitions and goals for a period of time until you can construct something new doesn’t register with them at all. They just don’t get any of it.
We came out of the Europa League final in Seville having made losses, and the story goes that a year or two later, on the back of a defeat in Donetsk in the Champions League, our board of directors sat around, looked at the financial figures, and said, “We’re drifting dangerously close to a place where our debts are going to start to cause us problems.” And as a club, we needed to decide what to do about that.
And what we decided to do, of course, was slash the wage bill and make savage cuts across the board. And from that moment on, we ran this club on a sustainable basis.
We knew that would come with costs. We knew that we would be giving up trophies—maybe even titles, maybe even a lot of trophies and titles—in pursuit of that overall goal. But we also made a vow that if we were going to give the manager less to work with, we would have to revolutionise certain aspects of the club in order to make what he had to spend go further. And by and large, that has worked reasonably well.
But the biggest fight was to get those costs under control. The biggest fight that we had wasn’t on the pitch—it was off the pitch. It was stabilising the club, putting us into profit, and then little by little, inching forward. And it was not quick. And it was, at times, horrible to watch. And we didn’t get every major decision right. But we got enough of them right to be sitting where we are right now.
Because we were run on a profitable basis and because we had money in the bank, that allowed us, when the time came, to go and bring in someone like Rodgers in the first place—and to put us on a much better footing.
I keep on saying this—Brendan has not had money to spend in the traditional sense of the word. If he was given a transfer budget at the start of last season, he didn’t spend it. If he was given one at the start of this season, he didn’t spend that either. Every signing we have made has come from sales first.
Last season’s team was built on the money from selling Jota. And we know that a lot of it was wasted, but that was fine because when you’re in a good position, as we are in, you can afford to get some things wrong. You have wiggle room for that. This season’s team was built on the sale of Matt O’Riley.
But the fact that we reinvested £40 million of our transfer take over the summer back into the squad—more money than the people the press is telling you are going to rebuild the Ibrox club by lavishing them with riches spent on Leeds on a transfer income three time as big as ours and with an even greater prize at the end of it—is telling. Only a strong, healthy club is in a position to do that.
And Ibrox looks at that and thinks, “Well, the only reason they’re in this position is that they sold Jota in one season and O’Riley in the other.”
And they miss the point completely. It’s not an accident that we had two blue-chip players like that on the books in the first place, and they have to be regularly big players, capable of stepping up, to get that money anyway. You can’t just sign a bunch of dross, pretend they’re world-beating players, slap huge transfer fees on their heads, and then wait for the money to roll in.
It’s not enough to say, “We think (based on what Celtic gets for players) that Igamane could be worth £25 million someday, so when interest in him comes, we’re going to tell the interested club that that’s how much we want.”
That’s not how it works. It’s not what we did. We didn’t invent the valuations of players like Van Dijk and Jota and O’Riley in the first place; the market decided their worth, not some crazy internal decision at Celtic to shoot for the moon.
And the first thing they need to do, if they’re going to even try to do what we do, is understand what it is that we do—and start acting in a way that is responsible, reasonable, and rational.
And they can’t. And so they won’t.
They say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. And so, yeah, we should probably be flattered that they want to be us. We should probably be flattered that they’re going to try to be. But they won’t even reach the standard of a halfway decent tribute band—because they fundamentally do not know what it is that we do. And they don’t have the stomach for long-term thinking.
Now, I grant you that the Americans might.
The Americans may just come in with a plan to run sustainably, and based on that, try to put the club in a place where it has an opportunity to progress. But they’re going to have to sell that as a long-term goal. And when Patrick Stewart sat the other day and said that there would be a lot of pain in front of them, he spoke as a guy who knows that this takeover thing is happening, or is in the process of being done.
And the media is smarting about that already. They’re angry about it. The Ibrox fan forums are angry about it. “Pain? Why are we being told there will be more pain? It’s an end to the pain that we want,” is the overall feeling.
But you have to go through the pain if you want to come out the other side. There’s no pain-free way to do this.
And in order to get to where Celtic are now, that’s what’s needed. That’s what’s necessary. And they’ve never properly diagnosed their own ills, far less understood the source of our strength. And until they do, how can they ever be expected to be us? How can they ever be expected to catch us?
Photo by Jan Kruger – UEFA/UEFA via Getty Images
Our latest podcast is now up; we called it The Good, The Bad & The Funny.
Please like and subscribe if you enjoy what we do. We want to keep getting bigger and we want to keep getting better, and that’s why we need you to help us!

It is the hope that kills their dreams when reality appears. Now aged 70 I seen them rubbing superiority in all clubs faces.
Only need look st the votes “Yes” to allow new yo replace old in the SPL.
A pox on their house
Living in our shadow is their whole future and they are never going to come to terms with. that fact. There will be no quick fix and that is the only thing they crave, they want our success but not to put in the hard work to get there. Even if they did eventually knuckle down and manage to become self sufficient and live within their means, by that time we would be even further ahead of them as we relentlessly pursue our own targets. Realistically therefore, there is no chase, only a procession for Celtic to gain further trophies, with only the occasional off day here and there to encourage the rest of them to keep chipping away at us.
It’s like The Three Stooges meet Dumb and Dumber over there, with Bawwy as Lloyd Christmas and Greegs as Harry.
Haven’t stopped laughing since I heard this news.
There’s more to that Oscar Wilde adage you quoted,
“Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery which mediocrity can pay to greatness.”
OMG James or should i say Nostradamus. Did you see that article on Sky last night about Man Utd?
It mirrored every single point you made the other day when you set out clearly exactly what Yank
“investment “ will actually mean on a leveraged basis.
Man Utd declare £1bn in losses due to paying £1bn in interest on loans from the Glaziers.
400 to 600 redundancies. £700m on unsuccessful transfer dealing. Massive compensation to acquire and sack mngnt teams. £100m losses annually due to no UCL Involvement. Ground in need of replacement. Exorbitent bill. Freeloaders draining finances and the horrendous picture goes on and on.
I’m sure IF any Uncle Sam investment does come then it wont involve anything but money showers to restore the Famous to previous glories ?
Your article was sooo on the money and the above is the proof of it. Poor deluded, even I am worried for them. Keep up the good work mate
Sorry meant to add that Man Utd issued a v good statement setting out their plans to right all these issues by dramatic cost cutting, living within their means and ensuring they always meet UEFA FFP regulations etc.
I am sure the Ibrox fans will also really buy into such measures to ensure they also achieve financial stability and meet FRP Lol
At least Man Utd play in a league that generates wealth just from participating, the zombies don’t have that. So it’s hard to see how they catch Celtic or how investors get a return. If the takeover happens, you’ve got to think investors will get a return even if it’s to the detriment of the club. They might’ve painted themselves into a corner over there and need to take a huge gamble.
Good article. The ibrox club, especially in the Murray years, had an obsessive, (extremely arrogant ) objective tae stay on top of us and its spendin all that money in tryin tae emulate our past European success, that eventually sent them down. We now find ourselves miles ahead of them and we can’t deny, that has been due tae, first and foremost Fergus’s intervention and since, bein sensible with finances, and of course fan contribution. The only downside tae this, is that it has encouraged our board continually tae be over cautious with spendin on the team, especially where Europe’s concerned. Ahm as pleased as any Celtic supporter where we are as a club, tho our board are still short of European ambition. Ahm sure they’re capable of strengthenin our team more in preparation without puttin our finances in any sort of trouble.
I often think of what these Sevco fans who grew up seeing ‘sugar daddy’ David spoil them by giving them ‘everything’ by way as it eventually transpired stealing almost £1 Billion from the taxpayer would think if their own children ‘demanded’ the very same from them…
They’d be told in no uncertain terms to ‘Get tae Fuck’ – and rightly so…
It’s always someone else’s money with these bastards isn’t it…
And it always fuckin will be –
Anyone mental enough to take them on deserves all the ungratefulness and abuse they get !
Is there actually some hidden board recognition for there achievements going on here. My oh my.
Progression is a process not a move simply from A to B in one simple action as some have been banging on about on here for well forever.
We are in a position now for the next progressive stage to commence which is that European competitive team and if our top players want to stay for another year or two I fear that stage can only be reached if they want stay and be on our side, literally. I think, I hope, this year’s CL participation will have set a fire under our top players to be ambitious beyond what a move to a club with deeper pockets and higher wage earner can provide them.I don’t think the board can dare now deny the fans and delay when we are in such a position of strength. So aye I think our dreams are in the hands of the players and it will very much be dependent on them deciding to stay and give it another go. I have niggling doubts as the mercenary word keeps popping up in my head but I do hope they show commitment to the cause and do so at least for one further go