Articles & Features

Celtic’s transfer business should be forward facing, not looking backwards.

|
Image for Celtic’s transfer business should be forward facing, not looking backwards.

One thing was glaringly obvious in the closing days of the winter transfer window: this club has very little imagination when it comes to signing players at the moment.

We all commented at the time that, while it certainly made sense to get Jota back for a lot less than we sold him for, and although bringing Kieran Tierney back on a free—if he’s fit—was a logical move, neither deal exactly screamed confidence in the scouting department.

Now we hear that Carl Starfelt was under consideration as a signing, and there are people expressing hope that we might yet go back and try to re-sign Kyogo Furuhashi for a nominal sum of £3.5 million—having only just sold him for £10 million. I can understand why some people might like the idea, but it wouldn’t exactly suggest we’ve improved at spotting emerging talent.

Signing either of those guys would be a step backwards. It’s obvious that Rodgers doesn’t trust the judgment of certain people at the club and wants to exercise his own. He wants to go after players he recognises and knows will bring something to the table. I have no problem with that. Where I do have a problem is in constantly going back and re-signing players we’ve already sold.

I don’t believe it will happen. I don’t believe we’ll go back for either player. It wasn’t that long ago that Kyogo was allegedly pushing for a move away. Taking him back would be an admission of defeat—both for him and for Celtic. Because surely, we’ve had enough time by now to identify his replacement. Signing that player ought to be task number one for the summer, and the moves should already be well underway.

Whatever is wrong with the scouting department, it won’t be fixed by re-signing former players. Whatever has gone wrong in our ability to identify talent, we certainly won’t progress by taking steps backwards. Kyogo was off form when we let him go. His head was clearly elsewhere. He wanted to move, and nothing suggests that anything in his reasoning has changed in any significant way.

The only argument for doing it is in terms of PR—how it would wind up our rivals and irritate some in the mainstream media. That once again, we’d have netted a major transfer fee and ended up with our own player back at the club, with a huge profit. But there’s no real footballing reason for it.

There’s no argument that it would make us a better team. In fact, in terms of Kyogo, we’ve already stumbled onto a better setup. Maeda looks head and shoulders above what Kyogo was producing in his final months at the club.

Starfelt is a different discussion. He’s a good defender, and I was disappointed to lose him just when it looked like he was coming onto a game.

We definitely need some backup in central defence.

Trusty and Carter-Vickers will be the first choices, and Scales will be the backup, but putting Nawrocki back into the side was a clear indication of things falling short. Nawrocki doesn’t have a future at the club and should be allowed to explore his options elsewhere. That would be good for him and for us.

We have a lot of work to do in the summer, and it’ll be even harder if key players leave. But I’d like to think we’ll show some imagination.

I’d like to think we’ll strengthen by bringing in new players, not old ones. Fans want to see new signings. They want to see fresh names. They want to watch players they haven’t seen before. They want to witness the emergence of new talent. That’s why all this reporting around former players is just lazy.

I trust our club to be more professional and imaginative than this. I trust that Paul Tisdale and Brendan Rodgers have worked together long enough now to do better than reaching back into the old well.

This team has to take strides forward, not backwards. I understood the signings of Jota and Tierney. These moves would be much harder to defend.

Share this article

James Forrest has been the editor of The CelticBlog for 13 years. Prior to that, he was the editor of several digital magazines on subjects as diverse as Scottish music, true crime, politics and football. He ran the Scottish football site On Fields of Green and, during the independence referendum, the Scottish politics site Comment Isn't Free. He's the author of one novel, one book of short stories and one novella. He lives in Glasgow.

9 comments

  • Clachnacuddin and the Hoops says:

    Back, Back, Back, Back is usually fuckin BACK-WARDS !!!

    • terry the tim says:

      No chance Celtic will pay £3.5m for a 30 year old player with not much sell on value.
      Starfelt was ok but time to move on.

  • Dan says:

    Transfer business at Celtic is not worth discussing anymore. We’ve all seen time and again what the priority is, make money!!!!! The team and ambition come a distant second. We will start the new season no better off squad wise. Yes we will no doubt have a few new faces but we will sell an asset as the board sees the players. Can’t help thinking Maeda will be that sellable asset this summer. Saturdays are better spent doing other things now

  • Johnny Green says:

    I would take Kyogo back in a minute were it a possibility.

    Starfelt, no thanks, we did well getting rid of him in the first place. When Keevins said he was bang average, he was actually giving him a compliment.

  • wotakuhn says:

    Anyone who’s read my posts on Kyogo would think there’s no way I’d have him back but I would just not as a no 9. I think he’d be more effective out wide or as a no 10 or lead man of a diamond midfield.
    As for Carl Starman has his fancy woman fell oot wi him? You know the one he left Celtic for and ran off to Spain after. Anyway no thanks to that one. We were lucky to get a decent pay day for him then but na

  • Brattbakk says:

    No to Kyogo, no to Starfelt. Both were good players for us, both wanted out. Just because it hasn’t worked out we’re not the safety net. I don’t think either would really want to come back, that’s where KT and Jota were different. There is a million other players out there and I hope it’s just lazy journalism that links us to every ex player going.

  • PortoJoe says:

    Maybe just me but I think Nawrocki has more to offer than he has been allowed to show. Obviously BR sees him in training but for me he is more secure in his passing than Scales or Trusty and is stronger in the tackle. Leaving all other considerations to one side I think Kyogo’s age is now against him for me.

    • woodyiom says:

      Totally agree with you on that PJ. He was first choice LCB at the start of last season then got injured, Scales had to start at Ibrox, was outstanding and thus deservedly kept his place for the ensuing games. But for some reason even when Maik was fully fit and Scales was having at least two bomb-scares per game he never got another chance which I really don’t understand. He was by far and away our best player last weekend (in fact were it not for him we would have been about four down at HT!) and like you I see a far better passer in terms of accuracy but also in both speed of pass and speed of thought in seeing/making the pass thus enabling us to get through high presses! Clearly Brendan doesn’t like what he sees on the training field (whether that’s MW effort or he doesn’t follow the instructions or he’s not vocal enough I have no idea) but personally based on what I’ve seen in match situ (which is what actually counts!) he is the only one I’d want to play with CCV.

Comments are closed.

×