Why is it that a lot of smart people do dumb things?
There’s a great story about Mark Twain that may well be apocryphal. But I like it anyway. Whether it’s true or not, the story goes that he’s at a dinner party one night, and there’s a guy there—some arrogant clown—waxing lyrical about his knowledge of words.
“Do you know,” he asked the table, “that the word sugar is the only word in the English language spelled S-U but pronounced S-H?”
To which Mark Twain is said to have asked, “Are you sure?”
I thought of that yesterday when I heard that Hearts have approached Derek McInnes and, after reaching an agreement with Kilmarnock, will hire him at the end of the season to become their manager for the next campaign.
And I cannot believe that smart people, who have boasted about how they intend to revolutionise Hearts with data-driven models and analytics-based signings and everything else, have entrusted that system—and all the money they’re spending—to this particular manager.
What I really want to ask them is: Are you sure?
To me, the appointment of McInnes is “safe.” And maybe safe is what the people want. But I don’t think they’ve spent all that money and all that time becoming experts in raw numbers and data to basically settle for a feather-bed, third-place position and lowercase ambition in the dugout. So—who made this decision?
Look, I want to see Hearts be a better team. McInnes will make them a better team. There’s no doubt about that. But he will not make them a contender. He will not create a team capable of challenging for second place.
Because he’s worked at well-resourced teams before. He worked at Aberdeen and once the Ibrox club was promoted they quickly fell into the old routine of settling for third, until eventually he couldn’t even manage do that.
I didn’t think these were the kind of people who would be content to settle.
Crickley came in and didn’t do a great job—that’s why he got sacked. But that, at least, was an appointment in line with the broad strategy the club was apparently going to pursue. I don’t see where McInnes fits into that strategy at all.
It’s a case of SPFL musical chairs. It seems to me that there’s a small group of managers in this league who just rotate between clubs without actually accomplishing very much at any of them.
On the podcast the other night, we talked about this.
The episode was called Third Prize Is You’re Fired—a reference to Alec Baldwin’s stunning turn in the movie Glengarry Glen Ross, where he plays a hugely successful salesman brought in to give a pep talk to the sad sacks at a rival firm. And he scorches them all with a flamethrower speech, the upshot of which is that at the end of the month, the bottom two names on the sales board are gone.
And I suggested maybe this is the approach that Aberdeen, Hibs and Hearts should take going into a new season. Third place is no longer enough to save your job. In fact, third place is “you’re fired.”
Will it work? Who knows.
But I do know that the Ibrox club has dropped points in 15 of their 37 games this season, and so it should not be impossible for a side to successfully challenge them for second place if that’s the kind of form you’re going to see from them.
When the team in second place drops points in fully one-third of its matches, then you should get sacked for finishing third, in my opinion.
It shouldn’t be a badge of honour. It should be regarded as a minor disaster. And until the thinking at clubs changes—radically changes—we’re not going to see any kind of improvement in the other teams in this league.
They have to stop settling for. Third place can no longer be seen as an accomplishment. It should be a sacking offence instead.
And yeah, I don’t know if it’ll work—but I do know the current system doesn’t. The current system, where teams start the season targeting third place, is ridiculous. It’s defeatist. It’s unworthy of any side that aspires to be successful.
Because that’s not success—no matter what some in the media and at some of the clubs might think.
So the question has to be asked at Hearts: Is Derek McInnes being brought in to get that second place? Or is he being brought in under the assumption that third place is enough?
Is Tony Bloom actually running this process? Does he have a say in this appointment? Or is this another Ann Budge bright idea? And we all know how good those have been. She is the epitome of someone who thinks she’s a lot smarter than she is. The worst thing that ever happened to her was winning the CEO of the Year award about a decade ago—because that obviously went to her head.
Whoever made the decision has decided to play it safe rather than take a chance on something that might prove radical and new and adventurous, and maybe there’s a sort of merit in that, if you’re happy to be an also-ran.
McInnes will get them in the top six. He’ll probably get them into Europe. They’ll do well in one of the cup competitions. And that will be the extent of their progress. But over the course of his time there, you won’t be able to tell the difference between his Hearts team and the Steven Naismith Hearts team that managed third-place finishes. And ultimately, that’s what’s disappointing about it.
They’ve chosen not to move forward. It’s not quite a step back … it’s just a decision made from a position of safety, with no intention of moving from there.
I’ve said it before—outside of the club from Ibrox, Hearts are the most dysfunctional club in this country. Possibly on this island.
And Hearts could be—and should be—a lot more than they are. But they’re dysfunctional because they can’t seem to find a way forward. They’re a club who do seem to think third place should be the height of their ambition. And they don’t act as if they have any intent other than that. And that’s the problem. For too many clubs in this league, that represents success.
The Tony Bloom revolution, at least, offered some hope that maybe Hearts were aiming higher. And then they go and appoint McInnes, and you realise that they’re as stuck in the mud as they’ve ever been.
It’s not inspiring in any way, shape or form. It simply wastes more of their time, more of their resources—and sucks up more of the energy that should be going into something truly revolutionary.
What a great shame—for them, and for the rest of the game here.
It seems to have been this way, for as long as I can remember. Call it nepotism, old boys network or whatever, but it’s the same names that are mentioned when any managerial vacancy arises.
Only time will ever tell whether McInnes can improve and have his teams playing in a more attractive fashion ! Hearts fans probably won’t give him the time and goodwill that he received at Killie.
Apparently Hearts midfielder, Baningime, came out in an interview and was a bit frightened by the possibility of McInnes as manager, as he doesn’t want to play like Killie do ( long ball) and be missed out in midfield!
That’ll guarantee him plenty of time on the bench lol!
Our fans’ good natured ribbing of McInnes, will undoubtedly continue, when he’s in the Tynecastle dugout!
“Cheer up Derek McInnes……..!” lol
HH
Mcinnes and hearts ,
Just another mcinnes team that will lye down to the huns . Dud .
His previous teams all lay down to the huns.
Kilmarnock we’re two up and cruising by half time recently, after the break they lay down and lost 4 goals.
Same will happen at hearts and why oh why Do these shit managers who win fuck all still get jobs in football management.
I back HIbs to push then for second next season. THey have been phenomenal since the turn of the year & if not for the rocky start they had at the beginning they likely would have only been pushing them this season.
If they beat them on Saturday they finish 14 points behind. A swing of 5 fixtures when they play each other 4 times really isn’t a big gap.
If it does come to be the predicted austerity at Rangers they will be weaker again next season & by Hibs trajectory they will be stronger.
I don’t want to see Hearts improve quite happy seeing them struggling for top 6. However I would like to see Hibs & Aberdeen build & compete again.
The result last night is a great one but part of my excitement for cup games in general but more finals is the potential jeopardy in them. It now feels like there is none. If we can do that on the Pittodrie pitch (side note fair play on the condition of that pitch last night) we will run riot on the Hampden pitch.
There can be no predicted austerity at ‘Rangers’ Jay as they are as dead as all the good souls in the cemetery up the road…
Other than that a very good post !
Should be some good Edinburgh Derby games next season a Derby I always enjoy and wanna see Hibernian Win as ma wee granny God rest her supported The Hi-Bees !
A team like Hearts deserve a manager like McInnes.
Did Tony Bloom not say when he offered the recent £10m investment that the aim was to “disrupt” Scottish Football? I took that to mean challenging at the top rather than settling for third place, which has made me surprised they chose McInnes.
Mcinnes didn’t just settle for third place at Aberdeen, he made it his stated target before every season started, in addition to trying to reach a cup final. The second target completely baffles me because why wouldn’t you just say “win a cup” rather than reach a final? You’ve only 90 minutes left to put your names in the record books and send your fans ecstatic with joy, but you’re happy to settle for just being there?
Unless he’s changed his outlook and stated loftier targets in his interview, I think they could be making the wrong choice here.
Did not think NC did badly. 14 wins, 7 draws and 14 loses. Semi of Scottish Cup. Remember SN left Hearts at the bottom of the league. NC got them within touching distance of the top 6. He also had to contend with the numpty Shankland.
He was in a no win situation.
Budge is the poison apply there. She always has been.
Do I want hearts to push for third – NO.