Another weekend has passed. Another game at Ibrox ends in scandal and disgrace. And more and more, we find ourselves asking the same question: why isn’t this stuff stamped out? Why is it still tolerated? What is it going to take before something is finally done about it?
This morning, I wrote about the role of the media in all of this, and let’s not pretend they don’t bear some responsibility.
They’d love to dodge that responsibility. They’d love to deflect, to pretend this isn’t their problem, that they’ve no role to play in the solution.
But we all know they’re as bad as anyone—and worse than some—when it comes to this issue. Because if the media, as a whole, was determined to see this stuff removed from football grounds, a strong campaign from them would push others to act. They would lobby the governing bodies—and they’d get it done.
But without that kind of consistent pressure, the governing bodies will never act. Because they don’t want to govern. They don’t want the responsibility. They don’t want to put new regulations in place and then uphold them.
Everyone involved just wants as easy a life as possible. Our game is stagnant. It is stuck in the mud. It is run by absolute amateurs.
Worse still, it is run by moral cowards. No other governing body in world football would allow something like this to drag on for as long as it has. We have sectarian bile pouring out of the stands every single week.
If this was racism—black or white—they would deal with it. If it were anti-Jewish or anti-Islamic abuse, they would deal with it. But because this is seen as a cultural norm in Scotland, it’s brushed aside. That’s a disgraceful statement about this country. A disgusting reality to which I refuse to accommodate myself. This is the modern world, for God’s sake. It is a stain on this nation that this continues.
Today, John Swinney tried to put the onus on the clubs, and that is a total cop-out. The clubs won’t do it. The governing bodies are the only ones who can realistically bring order to this chaos.
They are the only people who can push clubs in one direction or another. And I am moved to ask: what is it going to take before they act, before they make a definitive statement that some things in Scottish football will no longer be tolerated?
It doesn’t matter what’s happened in the past. We can put the past behind us if a line is drawn and it’s made clear that certain conduct will not be accepted anymore. That would be a game-changer.
It wouldn’t just be an announcement. It would be part of a real policy. And that policy has a name: strict liability.
For a very long time, I was venomously opposed to strict liability in Scottish football. But we need it. There is no longer any question that we need it.
There are things happening in our grounds that should not be happening. And we must tackle that broad set of problems. But there is an explicit problem at Ibrox and with its support. Strict liability would solve that problem at a stroke.
My past opposition to strict liability was based on the fear that it would be twisted and weaponised against us. I don’t believe that anymore. In fact, I believe it would help us deal with the handful of issues we have in our own stands. It would let us address the minority who refuse to toe the line. And I think our club should welcome it.
The truth is, the fears I had were mostly in my own head. We’ve nothing to fear from strict liability. Our fans are well-behaved.
Aside from the odd clown with a firework, we don’t cross the line like the fans of other clubs do. We could eliminate bigoted singing from the stands. We could rid ourselves of the bottle throwers and the hateful banners instantly—if the game showed a shred of determination to do so.
I understand why Celtic doesn’t want strict liability. But I think that’s a short-sighted view. I think it sells us short as a club. I think it leaves too many of our supporters exposed to a kind of abuse that wouldn’t be tolerated in any other walk of life, in any other time or place. That’s not good enough. Our fears shouldn’t stand in the way of genuine progress.
Surely the time has come. Why hasn’t it?
Are we really going to wait until one of our players gets struck by something—or worse? Even if we’re prepared to wait for that, how much longer are we willing to wade through the shit that flows from those stands? How much longer do we tolerate this garbage? Ask the other clubs how they feel about strict liability—how many of them do you think would vote it through in a second?
Strict liability is a weapon the clubs can use.
If the Ibrox club really is sick and tired of the toxic element in its support, what better stick to wield than this? If our club really wants to crack down on pyro and all the associated nonsense, what better tool to help get it done? What better threat to hold over the heads of the recalcitrant few who refuse to listen?
We all know that there’s a segment of every support who take advantage of anonymity in a crowd. They misbehave during games because they know they’ll be protected by that crowd. Strict liability strips that protection away. It makes the club and the support accountable. And when that happens, fans stop tolerating the misbehaviour of others. This policy would help clubs—not hinder them.
If you’re tired of the bigoted bile pouring out of the stands at Ibrox—and elsewhere—directed at our club and our fans, then why wouldn’t you support this? If you’re sick of flares, smoke bombs, and those who bring them in with utter contempt for everyone around them, the law, and even basic safety, then what reason is there not to back this?
The time for strict liability in Scottish football has surely now arrived. The governing bodies might not like it—too damn bad. They may not want to govern—but that’s just tough. They must be made to govern. Because whether they like it or not, they’re going to have to do something about this eventually. Football must start policing itself.
Because if it doesn’t, someone else will do it for them. Swinney might have passed the buck today, but the sense is growing that football is on its last legs when it comes to this issue. If the game doesn’t clean itself up, the parliamentarians and politicians will step in. And they should step in.
It’s time for real action. That action has to come from somewhere. Someone has to show leadership. It’s time the hatemongers were driven out of the game—once and for all. And strict liability is the only way that job gets done.
If strict liability gives the police power to adopt heavy handed tactics pulling folk out of work or their homes it should not see the light of day.
Strict liability no.
Easy way is point deductions growing in size with each offence.
Clubs would soon ban the culprits.
Points deductions would NEVER be a level playing field between us and Sevco Steve !
Never gonna happen.
Did they not recently bring in the hate crimes act, surely that should cover everything .
Get the cops taking images of all the twats at ibrox singing their songs full of hatred .
Stop everyone on the vid comin out the ground , charge them , bring em up in court , fine or jail them .
That will stop em
Never feckin happen, police , spfl, sfa, shit bags the whole corrupt lot of them
Was the highest guy up in height on the statues in the George Square Riots not a cop from Cumbernauld !
Strict liabilty…..in a word Naw!
The bastards would be a lot stricter with us, and they would use it to fk us up at every opportunity. That’s what history tells me.
Laws, rules, protocols, accountability, consequences and their new buzz words ‘strict liability’. WTF is going on here.
All of those words above have been in use for years, decades. Let down only by another word; Inaction.
Talk’s fine, action counts
James, I admire your perseverance in this. Will it happen, probably not unless the teams themselves want it to happen.
Has the person who threw the bottle been identified, will he be identified? The last time when there was glass in the goal mouth or our bench hit with an object, there were excuses but we have one of our idiots with 66 on his phone splattered over newspapers and social media. But nothing about fenian blood.
We are dealing with morons here.
Personally James, Celtic need to take the lead. We have issues within our own support. The GB bring colour and vibration to the ground but there are also issues. Some fans want political stuff left at the door.
Here in England and from clubs in Scotland we are seen as one half of the bad ugly sisters. We have to get rid of that tag. The authorities will focus on us, and ours is a small problem.
Did police not stop our fans going to CP a few weeks ago during the last derby, why? Because we are Celtic.
As I said I admire your endeavours here but it will fall on deaf ears. Celtic need to take the lead.
It could go some way to restoring order as clubs will have to think about who they let through the door in the short term, but, I don’t think we will ever see it as the clubs can’t control the fans, and the cops are to busy counting their money to be bothered doing their jobs. There was supposed to be the strictest of security on Sunday but still pyro and bottles got in, class A drugs were being taken openly, people left the stands and went towards the pitch, missiles were thrown onto the pitch and probably a lot more went that passed me by. The clubs will never vote for it and the politicians won’t lose votes with an election coming up. Turkeys voting for Christmas.
Experience tells us that our support would be judged more harshly than any other support in Scotland, I admire your optimism James, but there are small vocal elements of our support who would leave us open to accusations of offensive and the odd time sectarian chants. The IRA chants might be political to us, but in Scotland they are looked upon as offensive and to some as sectarian. The “Roamin in the Gloamin” sectarian ditty is still sung by some eejits in our support, these would be jumped upon at every turn by the Scottish media.
We know, and most people in Scotland know, that the most sectarian and hateful support in Scotland congregate down Ibrox way, but until we have a fair minded media, and a fair minded police force, along with fair minded football governance, there is no way I would trust strict liability to be administered fairly.