Articles & Features

The Celtic CEO is accused of lying to the fans. The club cannot ignore that.

|
Image for The Celtic CEO is accused of lying to the fans. The club cannot ignore that.

The other day, I heard a very interesting interview with two members of the Green Brigade, in which they claimed that the club has not had meaningful contact with them since December 2023.

Now, that was in the timeframe, as you know, that we sometimes refer to on this website as the mid-season slump. It was a point in that year’s title race where we almost threw it away. We were fortunate, though, that we got ourselves back on form and went on that outstanding winning run towards the end of the season.

We got the job done, got over the line, won the double. Everyone was happy. But that spell left a bad taste in the mouths of a lot of people. It wasn’t so much what was happening on the field as what was happening off it.

At the time, I was briefed by the club that the Green Brigade had been banned for hooliganism. I read the club’s statement when it was released, and it was broadly in line with what I had been told. I agreed that under those circumstances, a ban had to happen. The club could not allow an element of the support to behave in such a manner. It was very clear.

But in the aftermath, we were told that things had essentially returned to normal, that the situation had been stabilised, that all involved had given assurances, and that things could carry on as normal. I’ve heard it various times over the last few years that the Green Brigade and the club are constantly in contact over things such as banners, fan behaviour and a lot else.

That’s why I was profoundly surprised to hear a member of the Green Brigade say that none of this is the case—that the club has not spoken to the Green Brigade since that ban. Michael Nicholson, the CEO, has been completely intransigent and has refused to get around the table with them. Under normal circumstances, I would say that was business as usual. But it’s not business as usual.

It’s not business as usual if the club has been openly telling lies.

And listen, that’s the allegation here.

That’s what these guys said on the podcast with 90 Minute Cynic. They have claimed that the club has lied about its meetings with the Green Brigade and other fan groups, and in particular about the March incident where the Green Brigade were prevented from attending the Celtic Park derby by Police Scotland.

Before we get to that, let’s talk about the impression you get about Michael Nicholson from listening to these two guys.

We have long said on this blog that Nicholson is the invisible man of Celtic Park. He says nothing. He doesn’t believe part of his duties is to communicate with the fans. He doesn’t seem to hold much respect for the views of the fans.

Some people have said he’s nothing but a puppet dangling on the strings of a certain other person. Now that certain other person denies it and will always deny it.

What I do know is that when a direct question was put to Nicholson about the club’s hiring practices at the last AGM, it was the chairman who chose to interject and frame that question in a different way—a way it had not been intended—a way that sought to accuse one of my fellow bloggers, Joe McHugh, of being some sort of disruptive force.

Nicholson never answered the question properly.

We have long accused Peter Lawwell of being way too powerful whilst he was in the role of CEO, and that’s a charge I don’t think he would even deny now. But in contrast, Nicholson doesn’t seem to hold any real influence at all.

One of the most interesting things said on that podcast was that when you talk to Nicholson, or try to engage with him, you always get the impression you’re talking to a politician—someone who wants to make sure he’s towing the party line and cannot answer a question without going back and getting permission first.

That makes the Celtic CEO nothing but an empty shirt—albeit a very well-paid empty shirt. And that should trouble us a little bit.

But not half as much as telling lies should trouble us.

So let’s get to the guts of it.

According to the boys from the Green Brigade, they questioned Nicholson on an alleged meeting he had with supporters’ groups in relation to the March kettling incident. Among those groups, he claimed to have met members of the Official Celtic Supporters Association.

But the Celtic Supporters Association had already told the Green Brigade no such meeting took place. What was more extraordinary about the claim, even than that, is that, according to the Green Brigade boys, the CSA were sitting in the room at the fans’ forum meeting where Nicholson made that claim.

They describe the whole thing as surreal and bizarre.

But they went even further. They pointed out that Celtic has released official statements on the website, communicating with the broader support and claiming that those meetings had taken place; that’s a serious issue. Celtic cannot ignore that claim. Celtic should respond to it, and Celtic must respond to it.

I know I’m going to lobby my own supporters’ bus executive to get to the bottom of this issue. If the club think they can skate around this, they are wrong.

Because there is another incendiary claim in that interview which they cannot pretend isn’t there: the claim that members of the board have suggested to the Green Brigade that they would be willing to look the other way on pyro for certain matches where we aren’t likely to face a sanction from the football authorities.

That claim basically says members of our board of directors have willingly enabled the breaking of the law.

That, to me, is a much more serious allegation—even more serious than the Green Brigade claim that the club has lied to the fans.

That claim is so serious that the points made on the rest of that podcast have to be addressed. It would be highly suspect if the club tackled one of the claims on that podcast whilst ignoring the rest of it.

I want answers on both those points.

But I know most supporters will be more concerned about the lie—if indeed that’s what we’re calling it—and it’s what the guys on the podcast call it, knowing no other word to use to describe it. If it’s the wilful dissemination of an untruth, then that is a lie. They are perfectly entitled to call it that.

So are the rest of us, if indeed that’s what happened.

It may just be that there are misunderstandings and miscommunications here, but those two claims are pretty big and pretty hard to misunderstand.

It is high time Nicholson faced the fans. It is high time Nicholson got himself in front of the media and subjected himself to some scrutiny.

He stands accused of lying here—not only to that meeting of the fans’ forum but to the wider Celtic support on a very serious issue.

If he thinks he can simply ignore that claim, then he should consider that in the same interview there was a claim that Celtic board members have helped to facilitate people breaking the law inside Celtic Park.

If he thinks he can ignore these things, then he is greatly mistaken. Because both these things require an answer, and every Celtic fan should be determined to make sure we get them.

Share this article

James Forrest has been the editor of The CelticBlog for 13 years. Prior to that, he was the editor of several digital magazines on subjects as diverse as Scottish music, true crime, politics and football. He ran the Scottish football site On Fields of Green and, during the independence referendum, the Scottish politics site Comment Isn't Free. He's the author of one novel, one book of short stories and one novella. He lives in Glasgow.

14 comments

  • Johnny Green says:

    So Police Scotland can ride roughshod over the Celtic support and the Club, not only do nothing about it, they lie about the fact and pretend that they have. That is intolerable, it is downright cowardly as well, for we support the Club through thick and thin while they allow us to be persecuted. That reaction is not acceptable in any form, and especially lying about it in an attempt for them to save face. I hope the Celtic support, particularly the CSA, challenge this and get proper answers to their questions and, as a result of it, the liars should get their jotters.

  • DixieD67 says:

    If the CSA was in the room when Nicholson made the claim to have had a meeting with them, then what was their response? Did they contradict that claim, if not, why not? Surely if the CSA members present in the room knew this alleged meeting didn’t take place, they would have spoken up. Or were they just pleased to have a seat at the table and didn’t want to rock the boat for fear of not getting another invite? Or are the GB suggesting some kind of collusion between our Board and the CSA?

  • fun time frankie says:

    Liewell should never have been allowed to return, if in fact the liar was ever away.

    • SFATHENADIROFCHIFTINESS says:

      fun time frankie says….

      I think you can take it as a given that St Peter never left. No way was he relinquishing the grip he had held over Celtic.
      He just took a Sabbatical after the 10IAR Debacle to let the dust settle.

      He would have been kept up to speed with events at Celtic by any number of stooges that he had hand picked and groomed into their roles over the 20 years that he had held the reins. He was probably behind Dom McKay’s early departure from his role as CEO. Too progressive, too Professional, ( showed up Poker hand Pete for the amateur he was), too effective in his transfer dealings with Ange, quick, nae haggling over pennies, bodies in the door before the SMSM had the opportunity to spread their undermining headlines.

      There’s no fuckin way that he’s back in the door as Chairman just to pass around the Tea n’ biscuits at Board meetings.

  • Pilgrim73 says:

    Despite our boards many failings I would frankly be amazed if a board member had told the GB they would turn a blind eye to the use of flares. I can however believe that our CEO has failed to open dialogue with the GB, he does not show leadership at all, he should be the public face of the PLC, he should be communicating periodically with shareholders and through press releases to fans. He does neither. He should be at the forefront of the PLC strategy to support the manager & football operation. If he was the CEO of the organisation I work for I would be very concerned.

    • scousebhoy says:

      We should all be very concerned it is the ordinary fan who pays this imposters obscene salary.

  • scousebhoy says:

    Dixie’s makes a good point. On the pyro problem i

  • scousebhoy says:

    Dixie’s makes a good point. On the pyro problem i have always said that light just one near the directors box and the problem will be solved.

  • Wee Jock says:

    The CEO of the club lying to fans is nothing new. Did Liewwell not say he knew nothing of the 5 way agreement to an AGM and string along the resolution 12 guys. That was a big one and they got away with it . Messing fans about is nothing compared to that.
    The fans forum is full of sycophants and should be scrapped in it’s present format. Most people who attend do so to feel important and see what they can get out of it. They have already interfered with ticketing arrangements and low and behold some of it’s members are seen at most away matches when they never attended for years. Our clubs morals have been corrupted by this board and it’s cheerleaders in our fan base.

  • Ozzy man says:

    Supporters should ensure that they have everything said at any meeting with the Board on tape. Record it so that there can be no misunderstanding or spin put on it by those devious devils.

  • Gerry says:

    The bottom line is, you’ll never get any answers from someone who does not want to, or is not allowed to speak.

    Many things have been said and aimed at this board, but their interest lies primarily in the balance sheet and bonuses with no real interest or empathy for our support.

    We could go on all day about ticket prices, availability of tickets for finals, how we are regarded blah blah blah, but once they have our money, they are very happy.

    This will continue unless there is a changing of the guard in the key positions…chairman, CEO et al. ( Bring back Dom McKay)

    Again, we shall not hold our breath! HH

  • Eddie McKelvies Capri says:

    Before his promotion to CEO I met Michael Nicolson on a couple of occasions. He’s a clever guy but quiet, quite introverted, even shy, not really a presence, more of a backroom facilitator than a front guy who can take care of business and meet deadlines and ensure the management accounts are ready when required. I would think he would be a good second in command. A loyal and dedicated organiser who, I expect, would probably defer to his boss on every occasion and use that deferment in his direct dealings with colleagues and other parties.
    He is the type of guy who, unfortunately, struggles at times to give a straight forward answer to any question.
    I expect he’s Celtics chairmans Human Shield and well paid for the hassle that brings him. He’ll be there for as long as Peter Lawwell runs Celtic.

    • Clachnacuddin and the Hoops says:

      Yep – Unfortunately at a club like Celtic (and Sevco for that matter) fan communication is critical for sure…

      Paddy at Liebrox seems to be adept enough at it without being like previous clown incumbents over there…

      He needs to do better with Celtic supporters –

      But long may he keep being Lord Lucan-Nicholson with The Scummy’s of The Scummy Scottish Football Media for sure !

  • eldraco says:

    Its actually high time he got himself tae fuck and when he gets there keeps going

Comments are closed.

×