BILBAO, SPAIN - MAY 21: General view of the UEFA Europa League trophy on a plinth inside the stadium prior to the UEFA Europa League Final 2025 between Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester United at Estadio de San Mames on May 21, 2025 in Bilbao, Spain. (Photo by Justin Setterfield/Getty Images)
The deadline for season ticket holders to buy their Europa League packages ran out at 5pm tonight, and already there are voices waiting to declare this some kind of referendum on the summer, on the campaign, and on the mood of the Celtic support.
They want the numbers to tell a story.
The reality is that they probably won’t. At least not yet.
Oh, it is more than possible than thousands, maybe even tens of thousands, of fans stay away from these games … but that doesn’t seem likely to me.
For one thing, nobody has urged an organised boycott. Individuals may have taken that decision on their own, but nobody has suggested that this idea be adopted across the fan-base. That idea has been floated. It has been talked about. But it has not been formally endorsed, properly sold, or carefully explained.
In the absence of that, there’s no reason at all to expect huge numbers of supporters to suddenly en masse refuse to buy. Some fans will walk away from this round of tickets because they’ve had enough. Others will do it out of anger and frustration. But that is not collective action, and you cannot treat it as such.
Secondly, there’s HTCS. The Home Cup Ticket Scheme is the board’s insurance policy against precisely this kind of scenario.
Fans who are signed up are obligated to buy, regardless of mood, circumstance or boardroom crisis. That scheme gives the club a guaranteed baseline, a locked-in figure they can count on no matter what. They already know those numbers. They had them before a single supporter went near a payment page.
In light of that, they may dress up a high uptake as some sort of victory, as some sort of proof that the anger is not so widespread.
So, whatever the sales figures look like, don’t be fooled. The board will point to them as a sign of loyalty, as proof that the summer’s chaos has been forgiven, that the campaign is a minority voice. None of that is true.
What the numbers really show is nothing more than a captive market doing what it is contractually bound to do.
This matters, because part of the board’s survival strategy is to conflate compliance with consent. They will use the machinery of HTCS and the absence of an organised boycott to argue that fans are happy enough, or at the very least not angry enough to act. It’s a cynical trick, but we should expect nothing less.
It is exactly how this board has operated for years — hiding behind numbers, dressing up inertia as endorsement, claiming stability where there is only stasis.
The moment of reckoning hasn’t arrived yet. The test of the fan movement will not be measured by tonight’s deadline or by the numbers that come out of it. The test will come when the campaign decides to push a clear line, when the message is carried with clarity and discipline, when supporters are asked not just to express their anger but to channel it into a specific course of action.
When that happens, then we’ll see the real picture.
For now, we need to keep perspective.
It has taken years of frustration to bring us to this point, and the events of this summer lit the fuse. What brought so many fans together wasn’t one bad transfer window, or one Champions League knockout, or one act of backstabbing against the manager. It was the way all of those things combined with long-standing grievances over nepotism, over cronyism, over communication failures, over the academy, over European results, over transfer policy, over the way our own board treats fan organisations.
For years these issues bubbled separately. The summer put them all in the same room, and suddenly it was impossible to deny that the pattern was bigger than any single mistake. That’s why this movement is different. That’s why this won’t go away.
And that’s also why the difference between what Celtic fans are doing and what our neighbours are doing matters so much.
Over there, a manager is under siege after fewer than a dozen games. Over there, they are demanding sackings not just of the manager but of directors who have barely had time to find their offices. Over there, chaos reigns because entitlement and delusion make it impossible for them to see their own reality.
What’s happening at Celtic is nothing like that.
Our campaign is structured. It is disciplined. It is respectful. It is about the long-term health of the club. It is the first time in the modern era that fan media, supporters’ buses, associations, and organisations have stood together in common cause.
It is not about one defeat or one bad signing. It is not about tantrums in the stands. It is about renewal. It is about legitimacy. It is about the need for a new generation of leadership with a vision for the future.
The board knows this.
That’s why they are desperate to muddy the waters.
That’s why they will seize on whatever the eventual ticket sales figures are for the more match European package and try to spin them as proof that the movement is hollow, that the anger is shallow, that the majority are with them. It is nonsense, but it will be the line they push. They will hope the mainstream media parrots it back, and they will hope fans themselves start to believe it.
That’s why we have to be careful not to let them define the narrative. We have to remind people, constantly, of the mechanics of the HTCS, of the absence of any boycott call, of the reality behind the numbers. We have to point out that this isn’t evidence of unity, it’s evidence of obligation. And obligation is not loyalty.
The board has been lucky for years. Lucky that their main rival collapsed and left them with a free run. Lucky that they’ve hired good managers who turned good players into better ones and masked the incompetence above. Lucky that they’ve faced so little pressure.
That luck has run out. For the first time in a generation, the pressure is coming not from outside but from within.
They cannot spin their way out of that. They cannot wave a set of ticket sales and hope it disappears. They cannot escape the simple truth that this campaign is about something much deeper than numbers on a spreadsheet.
It is about the future of Celtic.
And here’s the final point: we are not asking for recklessness. We are not demanding absurd spending. We are asking for ambition in proportion to our resources, for strategic vision, for transparency, for accountability, and for respect.
The board has vast sum of money in the bank and no clue what to do with it. They squandered Champions League opportunities to shave a couple of million here and there. They undermined their own manager. They have turned a club with extraordinary potential into one permanently stuck in second gear.
So when you hear the spin, when you see the headlines about “healthy sales,” remember what lies beneath it.
Remember that no boycott has yet been called. Remember that thousands of fans are locked in through HTCS. Remember that compliance is not consent.
And remember most of all that this is not about one ticket deadline, or one European campaign, or one bad summer. This is about the next decade of Celtic. This is about whether we have a board that leads us forward or one that drags us back.
The numbers are noise. The important thing is the campaign itself. And that campaign has only just begun.

The sevco fans will get their way with the board by pressuring them to sack Martin,while we still dance around the subject of not having the bottle to see our threats through with our own board.
That’s why we wil continue to get CHISELED by this board,we don’t have the nerve to see the boycotting or protesting through to the end,and our board know that.
Spot on Stephen,the more we play along with this the more this board will hang on and we’ll be discussing this very same issue this time next year,the same moaning and whining but nothing concrete ever gets done so the board sit up in their ivory towers patting themselves on the back for another great season,not the football, well apart from winning the 1 horse race but the sales and turnout for the inferior Europa league.Next season is going to be even harder to qualify for the CL we’ve 3 rounds to play and if this board is still sitting they will penny pinch again and tie whatever managers hands we have.
I’m sorry James, this is moving into Orwellian speak and the equivalent of local Labour Party committee nonsense on voting for the amendment to the proposal to do something.
Europa League – we are in it, as are Aston Villa, Forest, Roma, Porto, Feyenoord, Fenerbahce, Lyon and Real Betis. Let’s support the team (not the board) as we have every prospect of progressing in this tournament and enjoying the journey.
The EL final versus Porto is one of my finest memories of watching our team “in the heat of Seville” come close to something special, up there with Love Street in 86 and the Scottish Cup final in 88.
For us to pooh-pooh the EL suggests a level of entitlement that Brother Walfrid would not have anticipated from supporters of our club. “When you need supporting…”
If you want rid of the board quickly you have to go all in.
Turning up every week with signs and chants to sack the board is letting the players know that you think they are shite. Even if not directed at them directly its obvious the support thinks the players are shite.
Because the league is so poor the current crop should still win the league easily even if they feel unvalued.
I think this will affect them in europa league games against semi competent opposition. The manager and the players weren’t good enough to conjur up a goal against the Khazaks. What they going to be like with the vitriol pouring from the stands…if that indeed happens?
We could learn from Sevco how to do not too shabbily in The Europa League…
Unfortunate but true – Sadly !
Fair comment Clach. When sevco got to the final, or even the quarters last year, we were calling it a diddy tournament.
When was the last time we got to the ¼ finals of any tournament?
How hard can it be? Surely Brendan can manage that before he fucks off down the road!
The calling it a Diddy tournament patter was just part of fitba point scoring, But let’s face it if the Ibrox team had won the UEFA Cup or Euro league in recent years we would all have been sick. I would hope we can go reasonably far in this tournament, whilst increasing our coefficient points, to me that’s something we should all support. We want this Board to get the message whilst not damaging our club in the long term.
Agree BR and the team have to perform better at this level, or else there will be no place to hide for The Board, BR or the team.
The players know that the fans see them as not good enough. This might not affect them all, but it will certainly affect some of them. We scraped past Kilmarnock in the last minute. Away to red star in a red hot atmosphere is going to be a culture shock for the present squad.
If we get turned over there the nastiness level will be turned up. Loads of players will want to leave if there is an on going campaign against the board.
It needs sorted soon as… Maeda looks like he’s off. Jota only came back because he failed elsewhere and nobody else wanted him.
We should walk this diddy league as usual but the diddy europa league will be different.
We got a good draw though so we’ll see.
Yes, James, i know i spelt ‘en masse’ wrong several days ago. LOL! That’s what happens when you post a comment without checking it properly.
Regarding the article above, i don’t think that type of action will achieve very much. We’d get our point across far more if we vocalised our anger at games. Repeatedly shouting ‘LAWWELL, LAWWELL GTF’ etc. At least it would be direct straight at its intended target, unlike boycotting games or partial (12-mins) games.
That would also show the team we are with them and not abandoning them. More importantly though, boycotting certain fixtures will not find much support as the Killy game demonstrated. Most fans want action against the board but not the team.
Please accept my apologies James if you’ve already stated that in the article as i’m in a hurry and haven’t had time to read it all properly.
While income may not have been used to best effect in the past, reducing the club’s income potential going forward will be counter productive under FSR. Already this year the reduced income from the Europa League will impact the club’s spending power going forward. This is all part of a vicious circle. While some of the reform demands are more immediate there has to be more longer term thinking as to what is the most effective way to reform governance and accountability without damaging the health and wealth of the club itself.
This current Celtic team have no chance of progressing in the Europa league,,,I will be watching on t.v,,,I,m not giving that board one more thin dime,,,,,