EDINBURGH, SCOTLAND - NOVEMBER 30: The Celtic fans show the board the red card during a William Hill Premiership match between Hibernian and Celtic at Easter Road, on November 30, 2025, in Edinburgh, Scotland. (Photo by Craig Williamson/SNS Group via Getty Images)
Celtic is in a strange place right now, and you can see it everywhere. It shows most clearly in the position facing shareholders who were completely disenfranchised at the AGM just a few short months ago. Instead of one shareholder organisation, we now have two. If you’re hearing echoes of the Judean People’s Front versus the People’s Front of Judea, you’re not imagining it.
The Celtic Trust decided to fold its not inconsiderable weight into the Collective. Celtic Supporters Limited did not.
It was Celtic Supporters Limited, through its spokesperson Duncan Smillie, that went on a short tour recently to tell the Celtic Fans’ Collective that it had its strategy wrong. Everyone is entitled to an opinion.
But if you are going to criticise a strategy and propose an alternative, it helps if that alternative isn’t one that has been tried repeatedly for more than a decade, failed every time, and will take another decade to produce even a single tangible result.
That stands in contrast to a mass membership organisation that has, in a matter of months, already removed the Celtic chairman.
There is no reason a shareholder organisation cannot quietly acquire shares in the background while also lending support to a mass membership movement. In fact, that is precisely what the Trust has attempted to do as part of the Collective.
The Trust has not been idle. It has worked away consistently, and while I have disagreed with them from time to time with it, those disagreements centre on strategy rather than on intent.
Most of us understand what a share acquisition strategy aims to achieve. We also understand that Celtic’s problems go far beyond who sits in the director’s box. They run straight through ownership and corporate structure. The idea that one man in Ireland holds such outsized influence is ludicrous, especially when he has shown himself to be such a reckless custodian of that power.
That said, nobody can look at Michael Nicholson, Brian Wilson and the current board — the board that hired Paul Tisdale and Wilfred Nancy — and conclude that removing them has no immediate value.
Even if Desmond handpicks the next CEO, almost anyone would represent an improvement on Michael Nicholson.
If people nicknamed Tisdale “Doctor Dolittle”, then Nicholson deserves the title “Doctor What Does He Do?” He never speaks. He never faces the media. He never answers questions. If he played no part in hiring the last manager, then what exactly is his function?
I understand the share acquisition strategy as a concept. I also understand that even with a fair wind, it will take years to have any real effect. We do not have years. This club is in structural decline.
It needs to start fixing deep-seated problems now, before the club across the city fully gets its act together. Everything Celtic wants to achieve depends on remaining the dominant force in Scottish football.
The Ibrox club is modernising its structures. We are not.
If Duncan Smillie and David Low — for whom this site has enormous respect — believe we can afford to wait literal years and that this represents the only viable strategy, then I disagree. I genuinely struggle to see how they reached that conclusion.
The Celtic Fans’ Collective is not a perfect vessel. It has flaws. I can attest to that from the inside. But it came together quickly. Volunteers run it day to day. These people give their time freely because they care about the club and want to improve it. I refuse to let perfect become the enemy of good.
For all its faults, the Collective makes noise. People know it exists. The club knows it exists. I find it strange to hear repeated claims that the Collective cannot achieve its primary goals when Peter Lawwell has already gone, Paul Tisdale has already gone, and the Not A Penny More campaign now gathers real momentum as we move beyond Christmas.
We are not just active. We have crossed two names off the bingo card. If reports about Nicholson offering his resignation hold any truth — and I’ve written about that already — then we are close to a third. Nicholson will follow in time.
Here is the most important point, and one many people miss. We are now dictating the game. Everything the club does in its relationship with supporters is reactive. We forced it onto the back foot the moment fans realised they had agency and could influence events. The Collective has grown too large to ignore.
The club has not ignored it. Quite the opposite. It closed a section of the stadium to try to divide supporters. It banned fan media from club events. This is not the behaviour of an organisation unconcerned by collective action. This is an organisation feeling the strain.
Celtic’s shareholding remains fragmented. There is clear value in locating and binding those shares into a meaningful voting bloc. That work matters. Anyone willing to take it on deserves full support. But those people should also show respect to supporters with boots on the ground, achieving tangible results in the here and now. These actions already generate headlines, shape narratives and apply real pressure.
We came close — far closer than the board likely realises — to a full-scale boycott of today’s match. Only the sackings of Nancy and Tisdale prevented that. A poor transfer window or the perception that Celtic have fallen out of the title race will bring that threat right back, just as season ticket renewals loom. Anyone dismissing the Collective does so in the face of overwhelming evidence.
From the outset, I believed fan power would win. Celtic is not propped up by a billionaire or buoyed by a colossal TV deal. The club relies on its supporters. Fans have recognised that and acted accordingly. The outcome was always predictable.
Yes, ownership structure remains the deeper issue. We cannot fix it overnight. We may never fix it through share acquisition alone. But combine that long-term work with mass supporter mobilisation — buses, blogs, podcasts, supporter groups — and you create a multi-track strategy capable of reshaping the club. That is why the Trust helped build this movement in the first place.
Celtic is in crisis. Crisis demands all hands on deck. I welcome anyone who wants to help and wish them well in their long, painstaking work. But they must understand this: without serious fan pressure now, without forcing the board into constant reaction, their own efforts risk failure.
People can sneer about pitchforks in car parks all they like. We have shown that pressure works. Channelled fan anger produces results.
Anyone still denying that needs to open their eyes.
The Collective has achieved an enormous amount in a very short time.
There is much more to come.

Still Nicholson delivers nobody…
Still Sevco stride ahead with signings…
Where are ya Paddy Stewart – A magnificent CEO !
It’s not deadline day yet. 2 loans with no option to buy will be completed in just shy of 3 weeks. It’s the celtic way.
I think David Low etc. meant it will take years to be the largest shareholder, i.e. more than Desmond, which it will and more power to them, but change is happening. It is possible that Desmond will clear house regardless. I think it’s the clubs move to create the unity they talked about with the fans but the big issue right now is how useless we are in the transfer window AGAIN. Something needs to happen tomorrow. It’s utterly ridiculous how long we’ve known that we need a striker and we’ve seemingly no serious target. The full fats and the diets are making moves and we’re pinning all our hopes on MON, as good as he is he can’t physically kick the ball in the net for us. Have the board downed tools because they know their days are numbered? Or did they just never do anything anyway?
What saved Celtic in the 1990s was the acquisition of shares. Why we as fans fell asleep at the wheel and allowed DD to acquire the level he did is on all of us. If you are serious about making change happen at Celtic then buy shares and align these with the Celtic Trust in terms of voting. Having a fan ownership model is the only long term solution to keep our club in our hands.
I have just watch the two farces dun dee and aderdeen did not lose they were not defeated they were not beaten they were totally cheated total absolute corruption unbelievable the rules of association football do not apply in this pathetic coorruptcountry
Yep, one of the clearest dives I’ve seen in a long time,.penalty awarded, it’s no coincidence that the diver Chermiti had already been booked and would have been offski for a clear dive if the penalty wasn’t awarded.
Dickinson and Beaton two cheats in plain sight.
Between the cheats with the whistles and our incompetent Board, MON will have a hard job winning this title.
Could not agree more with yours and Peters comments. Talk about daylight robbery?
James. I’m not convinced about this. Less than 2 months ago you were bigging up Tisdale “a football man” choosing the new manager that you had researched extensively. You had done due diligence and Nancy was a great prospect. You talked about all his achievements and how far ahead of Russel Martin he was. Hey, no disrespect I fancied Nancy to do the business too but hadnt checked him out as thoroughly as you. Nancy and Tisdale were out, no matter what, even if the collective didnt exist.
Lawwell I agree likely gone because of the protests, abuse and the collective efforts and possibly more to follow. Interesting to see if DD sells up too.
We are currently 3rd in a one horse race. If we get new people running the show I guess they will be expected to win every single title bar none or it will be failure. The current lot of clowns are on 13 out of 14 with 5 of our 8 trebles in that period also, and that is considered dismal failure.
Interesting times. Im not sure how it will end.
Any chance mayorism take a back seat and a chill pill…and get a job! Seemed to have a lot of time on your hands?
I am with Porto we need shares!!!! And commitment to walk the walk and pay
Interesting piece as always James. The one line that caught my eye was ‘The Ibrox club is modernising its structures. We are not.’ Would be useful to get a bit more context on that (perhaps a future piece) because as much as we are pretty dysfunctional just now I’m not seeing anything from sevco that would back that up.
Signing players is one structure where they are miles ahead of us Shaun !
Really?! Our signings and lack of recently has been terrible but we at least make a profit on our player trading model. They continually make losses and imo haven’t signed anyone who would start for us.
That’s an undeniable fact, Shaun. But there’s also the fact that those players may very well give them the advantage over us when it comes to winning this league. That in itself brings in the money.
The priority should be winning titles. But you are correct. When it comes to running the business end of things we are far superior to all our domestic rivals.