9 thoughts on “The Celtic Collective’s critics should rethink their opposition to it.”

    1. Not another penny…… but £millions spent on season tickets lol.
      Not a single season ticket will be unsold.

      The collective , however well intentioned, have achieved very little.

  1. II do question the point of the collective IF they hold an armistice during season ticket renewal time. The long term future of Celtic is far more important than this sole Scottish league title

    1. They know a ST boycott would not be backed.

      The scottish cup boycott was poorly supported…around 40 per cent. Far less would support a ST boycott.

  2. The Collective represent the traditional and commited Celtic supporters. Anyone backing this Board must be blind to the mismanagement they have inflicted on the club for around 2 years. If Celtic were a normal business there would have been a clearout from the Board months ago. Any supporters criticising the GB and Collective are helping to cover up the faults of this Board. Up until last summer I tried to give the Board the benefit of the doubt, and firmly believed they would spend the money the supporters had helped them accrue. Then blow the domestic opposition out the water whilst improving in Europe. How wrong was I !!!
    They have taken this club down to the level of a mediocre Scottish club, MON and his backroom staff are reduced to playing safety first football, as they don’t seem to have any faith in the ability of this group of players to play any other way.
    If Hearts or The Rangers don’t win this League they must really be rotten.
    How anyone dares to criticise their fellow Celtic supporters, whilst this board are in place , beats me.

    1. Hey micmac. All scottish clubs are mediocre at best. Probably have been since Aberdeen beat Bayern, Real Madrid and Hamburg and Dundee United reached the last 4 of the european cup.

      Still dont see what the collective have achieved mate. Every single season ticket will get sold. I told you this from the beginning, despite the posturing from many on this forum.

  3. Two issues for me here. First for James to claim that the previous Collective actions “in-match” had no impact on the pitch is a nonsense – if it were true why would bringing the GB back for the remainder of the season be expected to generate a positive for the team?
    Second, James how do you define “the best Celtic supporters”? Are they who agree with you/the Collective? Do you have any concerns about living in an echo chamber?
    I expect more from our Board and I believe our current board is not good enough. Neither was our board in 1986 but I and many thousands of other fans travelled to Love Street more in hope (and faith) than expectation- but always with a view to supporting the team on the pitch.
    We have five league games left – 15 points guarantees this league. 13 probably also wins it. But ONE GAME AT A TIME, SUPPORTING OUR PLAYERS ON THE PITCH. Everything else is either just noise or ego.

    1. Portojoe, I doubt if the crowd makes much difference to a professional footballer. It doesnt make much difference when we go to Ibrox and makes little difference when they come here. The GB certainly didnt frightening lowly St. Mirren yesterday or inspire our players to greatness.
      I do think the tennis ball protests unsettles the team though as it is them gathering them up and we have lost a fair portion of those games.

Comments are closed.