4 thoughts on “St Johnstone has to hold firm on the Celtic ticket decision.

  1. The Saintees owners have handled all this rather badly. They announced they’d sell three stands to us and the Orcs, and two to the Jambos, which is controversial to their fans because it means moving many people from their seats up to 6 times a season, lumping the Stone Island-clad Ultras in alongside the Barbour jackets of the prawn sandwich brigade in one stand. Then they launched their season ticket renewals, which also have a significant price hike reflecting their return to the Premiership and the cost of a season away in championship.

    In that order.

    Had they done it the other way round, they could say that having failed to sell 7000 season tickets they’d have no option but to sell more tickets to willing away fans to make ends meet (having already cunningly put that in the small print of the season tickets). Instead they have announced an unpopular policy then given the fans the opportunity and the tools to mobilise against it.

    They will cave on this, take my word for it.

  2. So Celtic board should listen to our fans but St Johnstone board should ignore theirs?
    I would like to see more tickets available to away fans rather than empty seats but let’s face it the diets could argue reducing our allocation has worked for them this season.
    I can see both sides of the argument, as a Celtic fan annoyed if denied opportunity to see team when there is a seat available but if a fan of smaller club I’d want home advantage to count!

    1. Good point, and let’s not forget that now 2 seasons in a row, clubs that have sold out there entire ground like this have been relegated. So maybe not the cash cow they think it is.

  3. It’s their castle so they set the rules and policy…

    But no greetin from them or anyone else when the chairperson says they canny afford players and three quarters of the ground is empty !

Comments are closed.