I am sure Colby Donovan did not mean to act as a shield for the Celtic board of directors. I am sure he was not literally suggesting that supporters should simply shut up, trust the people running Celtic and have faith in those who have brought the club to its present state.
I am equally sure he did not intend to portray the supporters as ungrateful malcontents. That is not how I read his comments, and I do not believe he was having a go at the fans.
But this is now part of the problem.
The conduct of this board has placed everybody connected to Celtic in an increasingly difficult position. Its credibility is so badly damaged that anyone who offers even the mildest defence of the club will now be suspected of doing its bidding.
That may be unfair to the individual involved, but it is the inevitable consequence of what the board has done.
We are already seeing it with Martin O’Neill. He has made several comments that supporters have interpreted as an attempt to perform damage control for the people above him. Whether that was his intention or not is almost beside the point. That is how his words have been received, and that is how many people now choose to understand them.
The trust has gone. Once that happens, every statement becomes suspect. Every call for patience sounds like an excuse. Every attempt to reassure supporters feels like another effort to protect the people responsible.
That is not Colby Donovan’s fault. It is not Martin O’Neill’s fault either, at least not entirely. This is the environment the board has created.
Anyone inside Celtic Park who suggests that supporters merely need to be more patient is failing to read the room. I understand that these people may not intend to insult the fans. I understand that they do not want to create further difficulty for the club. They may simply be trying to answer a question, calm the situation or avoid adding more fuel to the fire.
I understand all of that. But this is an example of the havoc the board has inflicted upon everybody associated with Celtic.
It must affect morale inside the club. How could it not?
There cannot be a healthy atmosphere in an organisation where everybody has to weigh every word before speaking, knowing that any perceived defence of the board will bring anger from the support. Players, coaches and staff must understand that when they are asked to speak on behalf of the club, every sentence will be scrutinised.
Supporters and fan media will parse those comments carefully, trying to determine whether they are sincere, forced, half-hearted or part of a wider attempt at spin.
That is what happens when trust collapses.
I have read Donovan’s comments, and I do not believe he was attacking the supporters. But the suggestion that people should retain faith in the board is simply not going to fly.
Nobody believes it. Nobody accepts it. Nobody is going to recover that faith because a player, manager or club employee asks them to.
The confidence that once existed in Celtic’s board of directors is gone. It is not temporarily damaged. It has not merely been shaken by one bad transfer window or one badly handled situation. It has been eroded over years by the repeated gap between promises and actions, words and outcomes.
That trust is not coming back. There is no realistic prospect of it returning while the same people remain in charge and continue operating in the same way.
This is where the selfishness of the board becomes especially damaging. Its members are no longer merely sacrificing their own reputations. They are putting everybody else in the firing line to preserve themselves.
Players are expected to preach patience. Managers are expected to defend the indefensible. Club employees are placed in front of cameras and microphones and asked to reassure a support that no longer believes the people above them.
The board remains hidden while others absorb the anger.
That is cowardly.
If Michael Nicholson and the other senior figures believe the club is being run well, they should come out and say so themselves. They should explain the decisions. They should defend the strategy. They should answer the questions and accept the consequences.
They should not leave players, managers and other employees to provide cover for them.
Colby Donovan should be talking about football. He should be allowed to concentrate on establishing himself at Celtic, developing his game and enjoying the opportunity he has earned. He should not be dragged into a crisis created by people in the executive offices.
Martin O’Neill should be discussing his team, his tactics and the season ahead. He should not be placed in a position where every interview becomes an exercise in defending decisions he may not even agree with.
Yet this is where the board has brought us.
It has made even innocent comments sound political. It has made reassurance seem dishonest. It has turned every public statement into another battleground.
That is what institutional failure looks like.
The people running Celtic have not merely lost the confidence of the support. They have contaminated the credibility of everyone they ask to speak on their behalf. And now, rather than confronting the anger themselves, they appear willing to allow everybody else to carry the consequences.
That may be the most selfish thing they have done yet.
Choose The CelticBlog as a ‘Preferred Source’ on Google News for quick access to the news you value.

First of all let me say that I already wasn’t a big fan of Colby Donovan anyway, as defensively I do not rate him very highly.
His comments though reek of a player trying to find favour with the hierarchy above him to the point of sneakiness, selling his soul to garner respect from a hierarchy that deserves none. What makes him think, at his age, that he even has the right to be heard. He has certainly gone down even further in my estimation.
I will not be criticising any member of Celtic’s coaching staff or playing staff at this time of discord within the club, the problems all stem from DD, MN. C McK and BW, these are the guilty men any other people being quoted are just risking collateral damage.
Johnny I think your criticism of young Colby is a bit over the top, I didn’t see where the quote comes from, but we’ve got to stick to the real guilty men in our criticism.
Micmac, that young whippersnapper is siding with the guilty men you speak of.
Agree totally Johnny.
He should be nowhere near the Celtic first 11.
Bang average player and thinks he can talk the talk.
No chance.
Colby Donovan has a lot to learn both on and off the park. He should be keeping a low profile until he has established himself.
In my view Donovan was thinking about himself first and foremost. New players coming in also increases the chances he’s not getting into the first team. He’s very aware of that.
As for Kelechi? A good squad player who is not worth the reported £40K a week he was supposedly asking for. Compare that with, say, Nygren who starts every game and is our top scorer being on a reported £20K – £25K a week. Even CalMac is only on a reported £25K – £30K a week. So there was absolutely no way any injury prone player was ever getting £40K.
I think any player should be batting away *any* club politics questions when asked. They should be publicly stating very clearly that they are “here to talk about the football. If you want answers connected to the running of the club then ask the CEO, that’s his job.” And leave it at that. That makes it very true and very clear who’s fault it is and who is hiding etc.
Kilechi isn’t worth 40k per week Richard, correct about that but missing the point. A competent board would have activated his 1 year option on last years contract and they didn’t. Missed the boat, balls’d it up.. He had every right to look at other offers and got a better one elsewhere. The easiest singing they could ever have made, he already had a contract. Laughable
The board are rightly criticised for their constant malfunctions. However, given that they are loathe to spend money on signings, should we really expect them to stump up on his demands of £50k a week, for an injury prone striker whose career they just resurrected?
Like jb above says you’re missing the point. IK isn’t worth £50k/week so we shouldn’t pay that BUT WE DIDN’T HAVE TO!! We had a one-way only option clause in his contract to simply extend on same wages for a further year and we let it lapse!!
Only then was IK and his agent able to negotiate for more money which quite rightly they did and found a club willing to pay ca. £50k for 3years. Well done them for negotiating such a deal and good luck to him. Our executive team royally screwed up (obviously thinking they would let the option lapse and then manage to sign him on lower wages that we paid last year). They really believe that signing football players is like buying buildings, plant and machinery and investing in distressed companies whereby you can hold the seller to ransom – hell mend them for treating people so shabbily.