GLASGOW, SCOTLAND - MAY 10: Celtic CEO Michael Nicolson is sen during the William Hill Premiership match between Celtic FC and Hibernian FC at Celtic Park on May 10, 2025 in Glasgow, Scotland. (Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty Images)
There is one criticism of the Celtic board which I almost never hear anywhere, and yet it might be the strongest criticism you can level at them.
I was on the Come On The Hoops podcast last night, and I repeated something I have said many times before. I try not to think of the people who run Celtic as bad people, because mostly they are not. That is not really where the criticism lies.
Where I can criticise them, and where I think the criticism is strongest, is in their incredible selfishness. Because on some level, they must know what their limitations are. They must know that their limitations have now become Celtic’s limitations.
That is the part a lot of people miss.
Any organisation is only as good as the imagination of those who run it. Let me put that another way. Apple became one of the most successful companies in the world because it put its trust in engineers and designers whose responsibility was to create products the world could use, products people did not even know they wanted until they existed.
Without the imagination of those people, there would be no iPhone. There would be no iPad. There would be no iTunes. Those people had the imagination to dream of things that did not exist, and they believed those things could change the world.
That is what good corporate leadership should do. It should imagine. It should create. It should push. It should ask what might be possible.
We do not have corporate executives like that.
We have the worst kind of corporate leadership, and it is not unique to Celtic. These are not uniquely awful people. Bad corporate leadership exists in every field, across every kind of business. But it presents itself in the same way wherever you find it: a lack of imagination.
What we have at Celtic is a board of directors that spends all its time thinking about what Celtic cannot do. We cannot compete with bigger clubs on salaries. We cannot compete with top clubs on transfer fees.
We cannot build a brand-new stand because it would cost too much. We cannot push for real reform at the SFA because nobody else wants it. We cannot change this. We cannot improve that. We cannot reach higher. We cannot think bigger.
On and on it goes.
These people have locked themselves into structural limitations. They have locked themselves into a cycle of “can’t.” And when I accuse them of lacking imagination, when I accuse them of lacking strategic vision, what I am really accusing them of is limiting their thinking to the things we cannot do.
If your whole mindset is built around the things you cannot do, you will never have the imagination to dream of new things you can do. You will never bring about a dramatic shift. You will never change the culture.
And the whole culture of our club is now infused with “can’t.”
These people are scared. That is ultimately the problem. That is where we are as a club. Celtic are run on fear: fear of the things we dare not try, fear of limits, most of which we place on ourselves deliberately, fear of getting it wrong, fear of spending too much, fear of ambition itself.
As I keep saying, we are not here by accident.
That is what some people tend to forget. We are not here because circumstances in the wider game have forced us to behave this way. We are here by choice. People inside our own club have decided that this is how Celtic will operate.
That might be acceptable if the thinking was modern. It might be acceptable if there was creativity. It might be acceptable if new ideas were allowed to breathe every once in a while. But we are a reactive club. We are a scared club.
I do not know exactly how we got this way, but I do know we are stuck in these patterns. I do know we are wedded to this way of doing things. I do know that every transfer window, every strategic decision and every public statement seems to come from the same narrow place: caution first, and then a baby step forward, if at all.
Part of that is bad leadership from Dublin. We have allowed one man far too much control, and he too is reactive in his thinking. He does not appear able to grasp modern football concepts and ideas in the way he should. He has not moved with the times. He also thinks in limiting terms.
That is how someone like Paul Tisdale ever got his claws into the club. This is a guy who allegedly told our corporate investors that he did not believe Celtic were a top European club, and actually scoffed at the idea. A person who thinks that way is of no use to Celtic. He should not have been inside the building.
Now, I am not suggesting that Michael Nicholson, Chris McKay and others do not believe Celtic are a top club. I am sure they do believe that, in some abstract sense. But they certainly have no idea how to get us there, because we are not talking about risk-takers here.
We are talking about administrators. That is all they are. And administrators are ten a penny.
When people ask me how I think our club would look without these guys, or when people demand that I name names who could replace them, I tell those people very simply that replacing them is not the hard part.
Look at the job they do. Look at the way they run the club. It is not difficult to find people whose whole skill set is keeping the lights on. When it comes to commercial contracts, with a fanbase our size, with our passion and with our willingness to spend money, doing those kinds of deals should be the easiest thing in the world for any executive.
The real talent would be not annoying those supporters so much that they launch campaigns like Not Another Penny.
It does not require imagination or any particularly rare skill set to do what these guys do. Any bog-standard executive at a company with income over £50 million could do much of that job. But Celtic require more than that. Celtic deserve more than that.
And that is where the difficulty lies. That is where the problem lies. That is where so many of us have grown frustrated and angry with these people. Because they must know. They must know they are out of ideas. They must know their limited thinking keeps Celtic stuck in the mud. They must know that they are not the people to take this club forward.
And if they know that, then staying becomes selfish.
That is the uncomfortable truth.
It is our imperative to remove them, but first we have to diagnose the cause of the problem properly. You cannot fix what you refuse to name. You cannot solve a problem if you keep describing only its symptoms.
The cause of Celtic’s problem is simple. We have an executive board which is scared all the time of the things it thinks Celtic cannot do.
That mindset is now permeating the whole club. It shapes the way we do business. It shapes the way we approach transfers. It shapes the way we speak about Europe. It shapes the way we think about infrastructure. It has even started to permeate parts of the support itself.
You hear it constantly now. People talk about the limitations we are working under as if they were laws of physics. They are not. Many of these limitations are self-imposed. They are not structural barriers forced on us entirely by outside forces.
We could spend more on players. We could do business better. We could operate at a higher level. We could invest in critical infrastructure that makes money. We could reach for the next rung of the ladder. But we choose not to, because the people running the club do not know how.
They think Celtic are operating as well as Celtic can operate. They are wrong.
That does not make them bad people. But it does make them limited people. It does make them scared people. And it does mean Celtic are not going anywhere under leadership like this.
That is the criticism that does not get made often enough. Not that they are evil. Not that they hate the club. Not that they wake up every morning looking for new ways to sabotage Celtic.
The criticism is worse than that in some ways.
They are small thinkers in charge of a big club.
And because they cannot imagine what Celtic could become, they have convinced themselves that this is as good as Celtic can be. That is unforgivable.
A football club of Celtic’s scale should not be run by people whose first instinct is to retreat into caution. It should not be run by people who see ambition as a threat. It should not be run by people who mistake prudence for vision and balance sheets for strategy.
Celtic need leadership with imagination. Leadership that asks what is possible. Leadership that understands modern football. Leadership that sees infrastructure as opportunity, recruitment as investment and supporters as partners rather than wallets to be emptied and lectures to be endured.
Instead, we have fear. We have limits. We have “can’t.”
And as long as that remains the governing philosophy of this football club, Celtic will keep standing still while convincing themselves they are moving forward.
Choose The CelticBlog as a ‘Preferred Source’ on Google News for quick access to the news you value.

We are run by a shower of cants
It is actually spelled “Kants”, those who follow the German philosopher Kant who believed that humans can only know the world as it appears to them, structured by space, time, and the categories of understanding. The reason the board do not see the need for change like the rest of us. Good spot.
Excellent article but the fundamental problem remaims the same. The bigwigs will only react when the stakes are raised. Buying season tickets while declaring not a penny more is doublespeak and will not rock the fiscal foundations of the club. In fact it gives the club an excuse to tighten their belt further.
dickyme, totally agree, I got a bit of stick on here from a ST renewer for raising the same point. There are a lot more Celtic fans who don’t have a ST. Why should they not buy merchandise for their family when the ST holders just handed the club over £30m. So NAP starts again after handing over that fortune to them, can’t see the logic in that.
Excellent article but the fundamental problem remaims the same. The bigwigs will only react when the stakes are raised. Buying season tickets while declaring not a penny more is doublespeak and will not rock the fiscal foundations of the club. In fact it gives the club an excuse to tighten their belt further. We are also being selfish.
Dickyme, I’m guessing you don’t have a season ticket. It’s easy for people without a season ticket to feel it’s the people renewing their ST are the problem. Why should they give up their ST because of the board? Most ST holders had their ticket long before this board appeared, and will have their ST long after this board are gone. The board are only custodians, the fans are forever. Yes fans giving up their ST may expedite the removal of the board, but at what cost. Some ST holders may never be able to get their ST back again if they give it up.
So lets focus our efforts on ‘targeting’ the real problem, the board, and let ST holders renew their ticket if they like.
DixieD67 I get your point but you cannot expect non ST holders not to buy merch and put money into the club as most have being doing that since before this board as well. I don’t criticise ST holders for renewing, but the ST holders can’t now proclaim NAP again.
Dan, I had a ST for 20yrs and only gave it up due work commitments. I even kept it for 2yrs whilst only managing to attend 3 and 5 games. But I still kept it for 2yrs longer than I should in the off chance my circumstances may change, which really I knew wasn’t going to happen.
So I know how difficult it is to give it up. Every person on here saying fans should give up their ST obviously don’t have one to give up.
I stopped buying merch as soon as the NAP campaign began. I would encourage everyone to do the same, but it’s everyone’s own decision. I’m not criticising anyone who doesn’t want to back the campaign, that’s your choice.
The only people I would criticise are the people still backing the board, and openly saying the board are doing a good job. They’re the fans I just can’t understand.
DicieD67 I see your point, and understand why it is so difficult to give up a ST. Just annoys me that the board got so much money before a player was signed. It’s also a sign of how bad things are that we are having this conversation
I’m not a ST holder but considering how long some people have had them for and the list of people waiting to buy them if it was given up, it is, was and will be nonsense to expect people not to renew. If they hadn’t then someone else would have so I’ve no issue with long term holders renewing. What wrong can do is stop buying anything else Celtic related and maybe even the ST holders boycott the games. Otherwise these kants will be here for a long time to come. Unless the grim reaper decided otherwise
Thanks for the history lesson cgreen123 but I was being sarcastic and meant we are run by a shower of C—S
Celtic and the SFA are both run by men (mostly) of limited ambition and narrow horizons. We would have more power as fans if we weren’t hogtied to season tickets and reverted to “pay on the gate”. Personally I don’t think having a high percentage of STs is good for the long term as it locks out many new fans.
The people that matter with regards to the directors are the owners and not the fans and so far it would appear that they are content with the board’s performance.
Off on a tangent, I was reading today that the two English and one Argentinian refs at the World Cup are deemed ineligible for refereeing either the final or the 3/4 place match as you can’t ref your own country obviously but more interestingly FIFA will not allow an English ref to be in charge of an Argentina game (and vice versa) due to the “political rivalry” between the countries. And yet here in wee Bonnie Scotland our refs are beyond such suspicions…
Good article and comments as usual, This hopeless Board put us all in a quandary, I and my family renewed our Season Tickets after some soul searching, I have suggested boycotting the two friendlies, on reflection, I can see why people would attend both games, The weather is nice, its a chance to take the family especially those who do not have ST’s, I get that.
How we try to either change this Boards way of administrating our great Football Club without damaging it long term, is a quandary I honestly can’t answer.
James says these custodians of our club aren’t evil, I beg to differ, the selfish way they ignore and exploit our support, whilst undermining our football dept is evil. Unless they change their ways drastically and soon, they will go down as the most hated Celtic Board ever, and I include the pre 1994 Board in that judgement.
PS, Has anyone noticed that the share price has dropped, maybe not dramatically but by a reasonable amount. I wonder what Desmond thinks about that.
When Ange appeared from nowhere ,every player he wanted was purchased…Why,because we had a forward thinking CEO in Dominic McKay who sanctioned every move only to be bagged after 8 weeks ?????? Thoughts anyone.
Now we are back to this shit.
The season ticket culture keeps real, less affluent, fans out of matches and is very un celtic like.
It’s ST holders who come up with the NAP and the match boycotts and it is no surprise these tactics have limited support.
How can they ask non season ticket holders to stop buying merch while at the same time praying we make the UCL and £30m+ in a cash handout for turning up to most likely get pumped?
So, they want to spend millions on season tickets and also want to make millions from the UCL yet want non ST holders to support NAP which is pennies in comparison.
It was never going to work!
If we want rid of the board the ST holders need to get serious.
Why don’t you go and join your anagramatical namesake and Light my Fire as the Crawling King Snake you are and join the Riders on the Storm to the big Hyacinth House in the sky and Break on Through (to the other side) as i’m sure thats where your from.
Never a Celtic fan.
THE END