With commercial radio being an assault on the ears with a rusty pair of pliers and with them also being like a tart doing tricks for their audience share they can always be ruled out when it comes to discussion of the meaningful topics or being part of the wider propaganda machine.
They may seem to be taking part in it but that is usually purely by accident.
A broadcaster paid for by public funds doesn’t have this baggage and should be balanced and fair at all times. It’s now obvious that BBC Scotland doesn’t take that view.
Since Sunday night we have seen them nail what side of the fence they are on in ‘strike-gate’. Whether it’s mockrage in blogs or allowing vacuums like Stuart Dougal and Kenny Clark peddle the myths that their fraternity want the wider public to believe in print, sound wave or airwave. No serious questioning of why the strikers (sic) have no demands or checking the anecdotal evidence being served as fact.
Why are they not questioning why these claims of abuse are only now coming to light (unlike their impartial colleagues on 5Live).
There only vain attempt at any Celtic interest was releasing a poor blogger into a bear pit, dragging out a former disgraced board member and roundly mocked joke figure who still delivered a technical knock out on Kenny Clark who is looking more and more like a confused hamster that has stuck a blue crayon up it’s nose.
Their panels have been well chosen to toe the SFA party line. It’s almost as if the hand of the SFA as dialled the phone numbers. The SFA are asking the BBC to bend over and the BBC are saying how far. They even got a rugby player to talk about the strike (anti-Celtic of course) plus Graham Poll who proved that he talks like he refereed. Out his ar$e.
So much attempted smear that we could well be in a 13 year olds sock draw.
The BBC’s reporting of this would be more factual if they were stating that aliens had taken over at Ibrox, they were going to spend trillions of Pluto Dollars and were appointing Subo as chairman after they had bailed out the Irish economy.
They lied and covered it up. Simples to anyone with half a brain cell. Unless your being told not to report that. The BBC can redeem themselves. Sacrifice Chic Young by throwing him to Somalia pirates.
hahahaha, everyone else is wrong and celtc are right!
True. Next.
You sound paranoid! Only today BBC released a statement regarding an investigation done to prove they were not anti-Rangers, it was carried out by a Celtic fan who works for the BBC!
Stewart Cosgrove has also admitted there are alot more Celtic fans work for BBC than Rangers fans.
The evidence the Rangers fans put forward looked like a strong case but Mr Small from the BBC decided the BBC had no case to answer! haha
Lets leave the paranoia to the Rankgers and get on with supporting our team.
There is no bias at the British Broadcasting for Catholics! To think otherwise is just stupid and paranoia.
Hail Hail
I don’t care about reports that someone was told to complete for his employer. If you have been listening then there reporting is biased. Not there employment policy. They could employ goldfish to keep the website up to date for all I care.
Nonsense. Their reporting, if anything, is very favourable to us. I dont know what station you have been listening to! Stop looking to be offended and support the team.
Your wanting me to believe that you dont care about their employment and that doesnt matter, so you want me to believe they have Celtic minded bosses who employ Rankgers fans to work on air and be anti-Celtic? lmao Dont be ridiculous!
Honestly, our fans sometimes make me cringe
Can you honestly say a station that employs Craig Paterson, Billy Dodds, Gordon Smith, Chic Young, Derek Ferguson, Jim Traynor asks Jeff Winter to give an independent account of an incident and has spent two days allowing muppets to peddle mistruths unchallenged isn’t a slight bit anti Celtic?
Look there’s my offended bus….oh that would be ridiculous if there was one.
Well the BBC is racist….. racist towards anybody with a sense of humour that stretches beyond making animal noises like russel howard or shit one liners like patrick kielty.
….but they do give air time to Aled Jones and songs of praise…which technically is religious content…
I guess they have to weigh it out by making Aled Jones the presenter, as he weighs an equal amount of the whole show (tonnes possibly).
If I was the BBC I would scrap songs of praise and have a show called ‘Desmonds diddy hour’.
It would be a show consisting primarily of Bishop Desmond Tutu dressed in a New York Yankees baseball outfit, just laughing at video footage of animals in jeopardy. Ducks on ice would be saved for the Christmas special obviously.
My point is the BBC follows no religion or anti-catholicism, because it purely cannot be arsed as they spend all their time thinking of more ways to make spins off of Doctor Who. Look out for the new spin off ‘Blonde haired extra in the background looks perplexed by the alien presence'(A BBC executive could spread that across 3 series or more).
To round off if you do not get any of the above content surrounding or placed well within my rant *Points at LOTW* just go with with what he said. 😀
Excellent. You want the BBC to become ITV2 then? That Jones fellow adds weight to anything.
I do find Russell Howard offensive. He’s like a young Pat Nevin.
The BBC is pretty much become of a cliche of what it should represent, the peoples channel it is not, it seems more like a mediocratic political tool more than anything nowadays, especially when electorial dates come around.
Russell Howard is offensive to pretty much all “6” senses, he even annoys the dead people I see :-D.
He could be a young pat nevin but I prefer a spastic chick young, no wait a minute chick young already is, so a normal chick young he is then.
You know the BBC being accused of bias by Celtic & Rangers doesn’t mean they are blanaced, they might just be RUBBISH.
BTW regarding the Hun dossier – we should remember the level of their debate – they went tonto when a weather forecaster made a jocular reference about their stadium!)
Are they rubbish? Unsure inept enough to wear socks on their hands.