Articles

Celtic’s Board And The Case Against Dominic McKay.

|

Not Understanding The “Complex” Transfer System.

In 2003, the famed and feared writer Tom Bower published one of his most searing critiques. Entitled Broken Dreams: Vanity, Greed and the Souring of British Football it is a withering, even devastating, indictment of how the game works behind the scenes.

It was an expose of crooked agents, backroom dealing, corruption in the sport, its tolerance for malfeasance and the way a sordid cast of characters are lent credibility and even acclaimed within the game even in light of well publicised scandals.

Bower’s book remains powerful today because since it was published it’s been made clear just how little things have actually changed.

Ten years after it was published, with much of the book lamenting Terry Venables ascent to the England job in the face of numerous allegations of impropriety, the FA came within an ace of offering the same job to Harry Redknapp shortly after he’d been cleared in a high court corruption case.

Although many of the practices which were then just “frowned upon” and which were discussed in the book are now against football regulations, there remains a lot of grey area out there which some people simply don’t understand.

Coming from rugby into football, Dominic McKay would have been largely clueless about them. Many of them are to do with the way players are transferred between clubs.

There is one piece of evidence which suggests that at least one deal for a player collapsed because McKay was unable to reconcile himself to football’s way of working; it involved Celtic’s efforts to sign the Rennes right-back Sacho Boey.

That deal appeared to be done until the player walked away from the negotiations blaming what he called “foreign intermediaries” for collapsing the deal.

But what does that actually mean?

Well, it could mean a lot of things, and some of them might, on the surface of it, seem outrageous to the layperson. But if you’ve read Bower’s book you might recognise the scenario. There are a lot of ways in which unscrupulous individuals can get involved in a transfer deal and demand a cut of the money. This happens more often than you might be aware, and the reason most people don’t know it is that it’s not uncustomary for one or both of the clubs involved in the deal to pay these people a stipend or percentage just to move the process along.

Think about it like this; a deal is just about done and then someone appears on the scene to claim that they own certain image rights or once represented the player or that they had a signed contract which claims that they do; how do you handle that?

Challenge it in court? That could take forever, and in the meantime you don’t get the player, the player doesn’t get to move, the selling clubs gets no transfer fee … who has time to wade through a legal minefield when it’s much easier to add or subtract £60,000 from the transfer fee and get that person and their claims out of the road.

Understand, there’s nothing illegal about this and if it’s done in the “right” way it’s not even against football regulations. It’s part of the cost of doing business. It’s an unpleasant, but accepted, part of the game and we’re kidding ourselves if we think it doesn’t happen.

But imagine you’re Dominic McKay with no idea how this stuff works. Imagine this guy or this agency pops up in the closing stages of a deal and makes a cash demand. Would you know to pay it? Would you understand the lay of the land? Or would you hold off?

Sacho Boey thought the deal was done, and then all of a sudden he was aware of the existence of these “foreign intermediaries” and their demands. Under normal circumstances the player would neither know nor care about these people, because the clubs, between them, would work on that side of it and get it all taken care of.

But perhaps – and this of course is purely speculation – McKay either didn’t want to do that or didn’t know how that part of the system works.

That’s how deals run into delays and eventually don’t get done, and in this case the player wasn’t willing to wait for these issues to be resolved.

Share this article

0 comments

  • John says:

    James, as I have said in a previous article on this subject it is dangerous to assume that the problem is all on one side.These situations are rarely black and white. Sure the board made some catastrophic decisions last season. Dubai and not removing Lennon after Champions League fiasco but we have now moved on with an absolute first class manager in Ange.I would urge all the malcontents who have Peter Lawell and the board living in their heads to get behind Ange and the team. I am old enough to have lived through the pre Lisbon Lions days of the early sixties and Lou Macari days of the ninetiesBeleive me this is nothing in comparison.10 in a row is gone now so we need to get over it and move. HH

  • Jim says:

    The Board cannot be allowed to get away with this.
    Why are they appointing a man who has ” no idea about all this football stuff ” ??
    What kind of Due Diligence and discussion took place, for goodness sake ? The same due diligence as when Lennon was appointed, and all other C.V’s from around the world weren’t even looked at ???
    For such a vitally important Appointment to fail after 72 days, the blame lies squarely with those who chose him and the process they undertook to do so.

  • John says:

    Wonder if the people who lambasted the board for leaving Lennon in his post way too long are the same people lambasting the board for removing McKay quickly if, indeed it is true that he wasn’t up to the job? Just a thought. Damned if you do. Damned if you don’t. HH

  • The Great God Pan says:

    I don’t believe this at all.
    I believe that Dominic McKay was trying to involve the fans more and this would be a frightening prospect for the board members and for Dermot Desmond.
    McKay was a Celtic fan and would NOT have been clueless about matters football.
    He is certainly well respected in Rugby circles and turned Scottish Rugby around.
    Could it be that the board may have realised what a talent they had and perhaps.some began to feel threatened?
    It is just another possibility in the context of an alarmingly lack of information from the club.

  • Hamoflage says:

    So best case scenario for the board is that after the shit show of last season they managed to appoint a CEO who was so catastrophically bad that he had to go after 2 months. Lawwell was crap and got 17 years, Lennon was disastrous and got appointed twice, doesn’t stack up for me unless McKay shat in Dermot’s pocket and then tried to burn the stadium down.

  • Thomas M. Daley says:

    I used to sign in with my name Thai Tommy, now when I post, message displayed “You are signed out”

  • Marcus says:

    A great article James. I had never seen the Desmond and Strachan interventions for what they were, or at least seem to be now in hindsight. Lots of interesting points made, thanks.

  • Iljas Baker says:

    Thanks for the analysis James and for challenging yourself and us – that’s the reason why this is the best blog around. Your points were well put and have made me more open to reconsidering my previous position. It all sounds reasonable and plausible and doesn’t entirely let the board off the hook. Time will tell no doubt.

  • Peter cassidy says:

    This celtic board and Desmond i would not belive a word they say as for mckay not up to the job give us a break new manager in new players in surplus money in the kitty after selling and buying progressing total bull$hit from the board football business not the hardest business to run when you have massive fan support like celtic maybe mackay to clever for some.

Comments are closed.