The BBC Has Refused To Reveal If It Spends Fee Payer Money On Ibrox’s Press Policy.

Image for The BBC Has Refused To Reveal If It Spends Fee Payer Money On Ibrox’s Press Policy.

Last week, an odd piece of paper was doing the rounds on some of the Celtic groups.

You might have seen it.

It was the reply to someone’s Freedom of Information request to the BBC asking the national broadcaster if they have paid Ibrox’s £25,000 fee to sit in at the press conferences. I wish I had grabbed that letter when I saw it.

What the reply basically says is that it’s not anyone’s business and the BBC reserves the right not to comment on that particular decision. Which should shock anyone who is interested in this matter and who pays a penny of the license fee.

The national broadcaster – which depends on your money and mine to operate at all – is telling us that it’s not our business how or on who that money is spent.

If they were being asked for someone’s salary, or to justify having someone on the payroll then you might say that this was an operational matter and it’s entirely up to them.

(Although if you’d had to listen to Neil McCann or Alan Hutton or one of the other assorted ex-Ibrox goons who have gigs there you might think their hiring practices in Scotland are questionable at best, and at worst toxic to their so-called “neutrality.”)

But really, I don’t see any defence for keeping secret a grubby arrangement such as this.

Because as this site has pointed out before, if you are a news organisation which is paying the people you are meant to cover for the “right” to have access and thus to do the job at all then you’re already compromised, and you leave objectivity at the door.

It’s not for nothing that Ibrox calls these willing fools “official media partners.”

That doesn’t even hide, or attempt to, the nature of the arrangement.

It has become transactional.

It is no longer about holding people to account or telling truth to power.

The idea that we don’t need to know if the BBC is buying access to someone it is meant to cover is risible.

If the Tory Party said that the BBC could not attend its events or press conferences unless the Director General wrote a cheque, there would be a national outcry.

The precedent BBC Scotland will have set … can you even imagine the state of the news if this was something that organisations applied across the boards?

Good God, every journalist who works there should be appalled and outraged at the very idea of it.

And we, who pay for the damned thing, should be equally shocked.

This is a story that deserves to run and run.

This is a story that needs a wider audience.

This is a story and a half, and I hope the guy who put that letter out there does so again and that everyone shares it until it reaches someone who could put this question to them in a way that gets an answer.

Because this does not fall into the category of stuff we don’t need to know.

Share this article


  • John Copeland says:

    When the BBC uses public money in all of its affairs world wide ,a FOI request of a public payment ,should be granted unreservedly! It’s a pity no one has ever asked about its employment policy .For example ,why does it employ so many ex the Rangers people with EBT ‘s ,side letters and tax dodgers to their names ? Which people decide this management code is acceptable in giving salaries to so many crooks and criminals ? There must be a lot of people in Governance with dodgy ears and eyesight!

  • Gerry Graham says:

    And that’s the main reason I don’t buy a Tv License..It’s the BBCs way of filling the pockets of those fkn Huns..Everybody do yourself a favour and cancel your Tv License because it puts these Hun bastards in the grubber..Cancel Your Tv License NOW

  • Dinger says:

    As I have said before BBC billy boys club

  • Marky says:

    In other words, they do!

  • Tony B says:

    The BBC cannot spend licence payers’ money on whatever it wants, particularly on ongoing criminal or corrupt organisations.

    If there were RICO laws in this country, the Ibrox racketeers would be in serious trouble.

    Therefore a publicly funded company should not be involved in any way with them.

    Surely there must be some sympathetic politicians who could take this on.

    Contact your MP/MSP about this.

  • Magua says:

    I have not paid a penny of this license for the best part of a decade. When I stopped paying, the BBC collection department based in Darlington, threatened me with all sorts of retribution. Ignore these letters. In Scotland, they cannot sequester your bank account, or force entry to your abode. I used to just bin the letters. I now make a point of sending these letters back to Darlington, basically telling them to shove them where the sun don’t shine. I also attach a wee note stating that the BBC in Scotland is institutionally racist and sectarian. Unfortunately, for Celts living in England and Wales, non-payment is still a criminal offence

    Hail Hail..

  • Martin says:

    The BBC has a habit of rejecting FOI requests generally. I’m not sure how they think this is legally defensible. But confirms that they’re a shower of arsehiles who don’t deserve our money

  • Binkabhoy says:

    The BBC is a shadow of its former self. It needs to be reclaimed, it is noinger independent but beholden to the establishment like never before, who just want to run down and privatise (NHS style)

  • A F 1967 says:

    By refusing to answer a straightforward question ,the BBC has confirmed that they have paid this. Shocking; but nothing they do should surprise us anymore.

Comments are closed.