13 thoughts on “Yesterday, All My Troubles Seemed So Far Away. Celtic V R*ngers Review.

  1. Agree with most,we were to bad for words on Sunday. but progress, getting humped in Europe twice, Struggling to beat ordinary teams in the spl, lennon it seems doesn’t know his first 11, It was a big risk giving the job to a rookie, not one win in a big game, progress to me clearly not.

    1. Jim the progress is there. We are over achieving in a transitional state. Europe was too early though Utretch was highly embarrassing. After two rounds of games we can judge the progress with a spirit level.

  2. Didn’t see the game but it sounds grim, especially after the Dundee Utd game. Think we’re just not as street-wise as the Huns (yet). I don’t know if it was an issue in this game but the lack of wide midfielders in the squad could be a worry, relying on strikers to do that job may bite us on the arse.

    Will be interesting to see the team, and obviously the performance, against St. Johnstone on Wednesday. Need to bounce back quickly and definitely can’t afford to go out of a cup on the back of a defeat against the Huns, even the CIS cup.

    1. Strikers as wide midfielders was Moggas downfall. Lennon seems to like the same template. It wasn’t a problem on Sunday, well it might have been.

  3. There is progress indeed but at the end of the day we were gifted a goal at what would seem like a perfect time, that aint gonna happen too often against against against the sfa’s XI. However Lennon didnt take the lifeline in his favour and two terrible errors later we had blown our best chance of a victory of great significance against the shame.
    I thought we would have learned from Braga, we didnt
    I thought we would have learned from Utrecht, we didnt.
    I can only hope we learn from this and more importantly Lennon does otherwise I forsee more big game heart break.

    1. If you rub your magic ball that foresees more big game heartbreak a bit harder it says nothing is won in October. The only significant thing that happens is British summer time ends. But you can only take the horse to water you can’t make it drink.

  4. Just re-watched the game with a clear(er) head. Agreed chief and lotw on strikers out wide. Stokes and Wilson were woefully ineffective down the right. In fact, we had nothing down the right side. I know the jury’s still out, but McGinn might have been a better choice as a natural wide midfielder. I think Samaras is good wide but he has this propensity to cut in just outside the box, run the length with head down and ultimately give it away. Lack of width was also obvious when we broke from defence and Hooper was left to take on 2 or 3 Rangers players by himself/or had to lay it off to Samaras early which gave them time to get back up the pitch. Ki had his best game in a Celtic shirt,very impressed, even though he got no help from Ledley, who was absolutely rank. Juarez was terrible too. What happened to him ? Stripper-gate ? Hope he’s not suffering from Naylor-Fox syndrome. Rangers were well drilled and stuck to their plan. Everyone knew their job. We were all over the shop trying to play total football when the players just aren’t good enough to play out of position. As you alluded to lotw, shades of Mogga, kind of..

    Gannonball, IMHO, we did learn from Europe..that we were not ready for it. As lotw points out, we are still very much a team in transition. I think Lennon is trying to tailor his tactics to the team in opposition and use the squad. That is smart. Unfortunately, aye, he’s a rookie and he got it wrong on Sunday. We gave Rangers way too much space in midfield, our defence lacked pace, vision and positional sense and the central midfield pairing were one man short of dictating the game. The 4-2-4/attacking 4-4-2 needs to be put on the shelf for when we face less organized teams. I hope Lennon learns from this too, we do need to start and nail down the big games !

    1. The Juarez situation is strange. Started great and as a Lenny signing you’d expect him to be given more game time but something clearly isn’t right.

      Question: I’m no fan of Loovens but does his presence mean big Dan gets less criticism than he should? I love his attitude but at times the actual defending could be better.

      1. Juarez, I don’t know. I feel he may have “impressed” too quickly. For many seasons we’ve been stockpiling midfielders as if we’re expecting a plague that’s going to strike them all down; it’s difficult to shoehorn them all in. I’ve seen elsewhere that we should try him at RB. It can’t hurt, neither Cha nor Wilson have consistently covered themselves in glory..

        Your Loovens question is a good one ! I just don’t know. Defensive communication and marking is poor throughout the team. I’m personally not a fan of Loovens, he never seems to be in the right place, or always in the wrong place. It’s a real failing that the defensive issue hasn’t been properly addressed.

      2. Juarez for me had a new player bounce and now we are seeing the settling in period. Must not be impressing in training or Lenny is pissed off that he never got an invite to THAT party.

        Big Dan is what he is. An experienced journeyman who has never played in a top league. Could he be there more for presence than actually ability?

  5. Progress? We cannot talk progress while ‘players’ such as Samarashole and Loovens pull on the famous hoops. “The celtic shirt does not shrink to fit inferior players!” I beg to fekn differ.

Comments are closed.