We must be playing Dundee United at the weekend. How do I know?
Well, off course I can read the fixture list but the other sign is the man, whose head Katie Price used as a model for her breast implants, being given publicity talking about things that don’t concern him and talking about his pet hate Celtic.
“Obviously, you see players in certain teams going down but I don’t think for one second that Naisy [Naismith] is a cheat: he’s a player I respect and admire and I’d love to have him in my team. For me he’s one of our most honest and hard-working players and I’ve noticed that even more since working with him for Scotland. I think it would be really unfair if he was tarred as a cheat.”
Tv pictures prove that Naisy (sic) wasn’t touched. Just like he wasn’t touched in the first half. So, since Naisy (sic) is honest and hard-working Scotsman, does that mean that he feels that it’s only those pesky Johnnies that will bring the game into disrepute by ‘diving‘.
“Ki Sung-Yong went in two minutes later and went down like a sack of tatties.“. Ki, dodgy monkey impressions aside, seems a decent sort and didn’t dive. There was contact. Unlike honest and hard-working Naisy (sic).
Looking back at the Dougie Dougie Gate game match report Houston’s post-match comments are worse or just as bad – dependant on your viewpoint – than anything The Ginger Guardiola has done. I haven’t seen many pictures of Houston looking like a snarling monkey being pleasured by a toilet brush or becoming public enemy number one.
Maybe that is because he is a Blazer Buggerer.
His reading of the incident brought Ferret Heid himself out from his hutch.
The fact that Houston has put his view in print gives them justification. Houston’s comments should have been ridiculed but they weren’t. Ferret Heid felt safe enough to come out and spin further bullshampoo that he didn’t dive. Again, no mocking or laughing or calling him a cheat.
A quick check on the UEFA site – yes, I still look as I like to see what the Big Boys are up to as I really miss struggling to beat poor Israeli sides – shows Naisy (sic) as the most fouled player in the Big Cup. Forgive me but he’s not Messi and being singled out for treatment. He tops the list of those light on their feet.
Since none of these ‘claims’ are questioned and printed in the paper it means that they are out in the open as the truth. People believe what is printed in the Pukp Fiction. It’s there in bold letters. Bold means it’s the truth. Even if it’s in Comic Sans.
The bold pointed to Lennon being an angry wanking monkey again. He was only telling the truth. But his truth is always questioned and spun.
A sensational attack from the Manager Of The Month. What bollocks.
Right, what was my original point. Yes. Peter Houston is a knob.
Click on the images to follow the blog on these social network thingys for anti-social people.
I get so angry at these type of stories that you’ve reported on.
I even sometimes wonder if they try to write just to see how much of a reaction they will get.
Just more fodder for another laptop loyal book.
Keep pointing it out, the more they know we know what they’re doing, the more ridiculous the spin will become. And that will be more entertaining! They will become even more ridiculous!
DarnTheHairWeCare!
The Joofy daily update was a perfect example of how the press were getting used. That man has been wronged in the eyes of the majority that read that rag. Why? He said it and they good fellows put it in bold print. It’s the accepted truth in many a workies van or office canteen now…
You could easily argue that Houston should be up for a charge from the SFA for arguing about a referee’s decision.
After all, Calum Murray is the man who first called Naismith a cheat. Okay, he used the posh UEFA word “simulation” but its the same thing. Anyone arguing that he’s not a cheat is questioning the integrity of a referee! And we know how much they hate that!
Great point. Houston and Greyfriars Jobby question the integrity of the MIBS all the time. But they’re good eggs anit they?