Articles

One Year On From Lennon, The Question Remains: How Could Celtic Have Been So Reckless?

|
Image for One Year On From Lennon, The Question Remains: How Could Celtic Have Been So Reckless?

Twelve months ago, Neil Lennon was issued his final marching orders from Celtic Park. A mere few months before he was unveiled as our boss on a “temporary” deal I wrote a piece saying that those linking him with a return would certainly never see it happen.

I was completely confident in that prediction, based on, amongst other things, a grounded knowledge of how his first tenure was viewed by people inside Celtic Park.

To me, it was inconceivable that after the disasters at Bolton and Hibs that they would ever head down that path again. And then they did it.

It shocks me now every bit as much as it did at the time.

I thought the decision to give Lennon the job the first time was scandalous and reeked of a board that was out of ideas.

To have offered him it a second time, when they knew every single one of his weaknesses, was reckless beyond belief, a decision so appalling that it spoiled what was, for me, one of the greatest days in my time supporting this club.

I know I am not alone in having felt my stomach drop as well as my jaw that day.

The crass way in which it was done, and the cynical and manipulative way that it was announced, confirmed that many of on our board were, and remain, utter charlatans. Lawwell’s blithe and arrogant dismissal of all the other candidates would, I’m certain, have haunted us when we looking for Lennon’s eventual replacement.

I cannot remember ever being so disgusted at Celtic.

Neil Lennon is not a good football manager.

He colossally underachieved in his first spell at the club and whilst he points to his record in the second as proof that he knows his business the real truth is that Lennon inherited a Ferrari of a football club. For a while it continued to run splendidly, but from the moment he took over all forward momentum was lost.

We were going backwards from the day and hour he took charge on a full-time basis. Out went the focus on sports science, which he disdains. Out went the sensible procurement of players; his transfer record was so dire in his second tenure – without the likes of John Park and others to steer him right – that up until this morning, and the departure of Bolingoli on loan, we still had £15 million of his waste right there on our books.

Thinking of the job Ange has done with just over £20 million, I shudder at the thought that this board might have given Lennon more. In the January window of last year, he got not one penny of the club’s money to spend on players and for the first time in my living memory there was not a single Celtic fan who expressed anger at the club’s lack of activity.

The regression of key players was obvious, and awful, to witness. The only footballer who came on during his tenure was Stephen Welsh, a raw youth from the reserves, promoted because Lennon was all out of options. Options that included playing Nir Bitton in a positon he has never looked at all comfortable. Note the transformation as Ange puts him back where he belongs, in midfield, where he played the better part of his career.

Lennon has made much of the professionalism of the players when they returned to the club for pre-season training last year. He said that there were some who obviously didn’t want to be here any longer. I have always thought that such a high number of unhappy players at a given time speaks to issues within the club itself, and not simply with individual players.

He slammed several of them for turning up out of shape; he himself turned up a massively overweight unshaven shambles. To think that he criticised players and their physical condition whilst in that state … well, is it any wonder that some of them just zoned out?

The same issues followed him at Bolton and Hibs. It was not even a mild surprise when he started to lash the players at every single press conference; there were obviously serious issues within the club. He had lost the dressing room before the campaign even started, a situation made far worse when he brushed aside his own tactical ineptitude to put the onus on them after the disastrous Champions League exit at the hands of Ferencvaros.

If there really were unhappy players who had stopped wanting to be at the club, he had a responsibility to move them on. Why didn’t he? Was he over-ruled? By who? If he was that speaks to weakness. If he decided not to then he’s a fool, because after so publicly calling them out how did he ever expect to get them to trust him and play for him?

His tactics were one dimensional and often baffling. His penchant for playing players out of position was ludicrous. Some of the results – the home and away reversals to Prague the worst amongst them, along with the League Cup exit – were almost enough, on their own, to justify his dismissal. Taken as a collective, he really has no case for the defence.

Still he continues to mount one. His assertion that plenty of other multiple title winning teams lost their crowns last season is his way of saying that he was beaten by an historical trend, not by any failures he had anything to do with, and it’s as ridiculous and arrogant as any of the many, many arguments he has offered up in his own mitigation.

We had a humiliating campaign. We surrendered not just the league but the two domestic trophies. Europe was a catastrophe I wish I could erase from my memory. Every press conference he gave ended with me shouting at the telly.

He says that many of those who protested and called for his head probably regret it. I don’t know who he talks to or what he reads, but the only thing many of us regret is that our board dithered and delayed the inevitable for two inexplicable months as the gap at the top grew and as any hope for redemption went by the boards.

His egotistical, unhinged rant after the disastrous Dubai trip didn’t only insult the majority of people in the country – his argument that it was a “training and conditioning trip” sounds so like Johnson’s “I thought it was a work event” that it makes me furious – but it actually undercut the public apology which the CEO had offered on behalf of Celtic just days before.

Lennon’s standing amongst much of the support has taken a pummelling from which it will not easily recover. I write that, in fact, and I do know of one way that he can start to make it alright; he can, instead of offering excuses, offer the apology that this support and our club deserves for the mess he made of it and left it in.

In doing so, he can also start to build back towards a career in management again.

And that’s my final word to those who accuse me of never having a good word to say about Lennon, who think that I’m casually dismissing his success at Celtic, that I am wrong to say that he is not a good coach and I’m wrong to say he never deserved the gig.

One year on, despite months of advertising his availability to every club needing a new boss, Lennon remains without a job in football.

Are we all wrong, or is there perhaps something chairmen and owners see which gives them major cause for concern?

If Lennon’s record is all we’re talking about, then surely one of the many, many clubs would have taken a chance?

Why haven’t they?

Because Lennon’s record is about more than just points on the board and trophies and titles … he may have added to the trophy haul but he left our club shattered and bereft and facing a summer of turmoil.

And he has never accepted one iota of responsibility for that.

Neither have some of those who made the inexplicable, and indefensible, decision to give him the manager’s job a second time when he departed after his first tenure with some of those same people sighing with relief at the parting of the ways.

They knew what they were getting; the evidence of it was there in his departure from Easter Road, so they cannot claim to have been in ignorance.

They knew his habits and inclinations from his first spell, after which Ronny Deila inherited a squad so unfit that he was stunned.

The last line from his defenders is to say that he answered the call when the club was in greatest need after Rodgers’ midnight flit; it’s manifestly untrue as well.

We rescued Lennon from a dole queue.

This wasn’t the return of the Prodigal Son; this was an act of charity he did not deserve.

His departure at Hibs came amidst career-ending circumstances; we gave him a shot at rehabilitation and last season was the calamitous result of that.

His second tenure at our club would have put £1 million in his pockets, at a minimum.

What did they believe they were getting for that money?

Where did they think the path led?

After embracing modern methods under Deila and then under Rodgers the board took the baffling decision to appoint a manager who would reverse all of that, and take us back to a management style which does not fit the game any longer.

Their rationale has never been fully explained, but it’s hinted at in a lot of tedious drivel about him “being one of our own” and how much he “understands Celtic.”

But I would stipulate that we’re really not that complicated and it’s a dreadful basis on which to give someone the gig. A good and decent man came from the other side of the world, with no connection to us at all, and made clear by his actions and ideals that he understands this club, without needing to be brought up immersed in it.

For some, Lennon will forever be a hero. They garnish him with terms like “legend” and “icon” and that’s fair enough. He’s won the treble as a player and as a manager; that gets him a place in the history books, and no-one would grudge him it. His successes were our successes after all, and that’s the simple fact of it.

But to many others, myself included, he departed our club a vastly diminished figure, lucky ever to have had the job in the first place. His conduct since has made a schism into a chasm, and as long as he persists in blaming everyone else I see no easy way that he can heal the wounds his second tenure caused.

A year on I am just glad that his shadow no longer haunts us, and when I write it this time I can do so in the complete assurance that there is nobody out there thinking different; Neil Lennon’s days at the centre of Celtic are over with, for good.

There will be no third spell, no shock which ends in his standing in the home dugout once again … that’s done.

Indeed, Lennon will be lucky to sit in any dugout anywhere in football again.

He is our Ally McCoist, a guy over-promoted (twice) and incomprehensibly handed a job that was miles out of his league.

Just as no club ever trusted McCoist with that opportunity I cannot see a route back to football unless some chairman somewhere is willing to take the same unpardonable risk that ours incredibly decided to gamble ten in a row on.

I know why those other chairmen won’t.

I still, to this day, cannot fathom why ours did.

Share this article

0 comments

  • Rianaldo says:

    What concerns me more is Lawell has NOT left the building!

  • Damian says:

    Short answer to your headline question (for me):

    Because we don’t have a director of football or any sustainable football operation that can outlive a single manager. Until this changes, when a good manager leaves, as he surely will sooner or later, there is nobody left to recruit and a appoint his replacement below board level. This will leave people with no particular expertise in this area making the most important decision a club has to make.

    We still haven’t changed that so it’s likely to happen again soon. It is logical to be so reckless when you’re set up so recklessly. Just hoping to be lucky, and luck runs out when the hope’s all you’ve got.

    • Damian says:

      A couple of typos in there, ‘soon’ being the main one.

      To be clear, that was a mistake. No sign that this will happen soon, just that it will happen.

  • Henry says:

    I think the answer is that many of our so called leaders claim to have expert judgement, and commercial nous. Having met many of these people in my career, they don’t. What they are good at is talking, looking the part and sounding the part and they happen to work for organisations and industries that are growing so even an idiot will succeed in the early days. Plus many of them are unscrupulous, completely lacking in fairness and morality.

    Private Eye gives a good example of this with the sub-postmasters who were jailed. The problem with the computer system at the PO was known, but they covered it up.

    Lawwell was the highest paid chief exec in British football. Why? I first came across him when he was appointed in the early naughties. Apart from going 15 rounds with the English language, the other thing that struck me was his claim that he could reduce the spend and improve the team, it was obviously BS but I guess the Board believed him.

    They start to believe their own propaganda when very often success is a combination of luck, fortuitous circumstances, the efforts of many and inheriting a good setup from a previous manager or regime.

  • Yada Ya says:

    Totally agree. Even with our successes he stalled our forward progress and regressed us in practically every aspect of our play. Did not even abide by his ” I will know when it is time to go because of results” but hung around like a bad smell, was never his fault. Just glad he has gone and taken the myth of a “Celtic Man” with him. Ange has shown what a modern coach and application can achieve.

  • jrm63 says:

    Difficult to argue. His record with Bolton and Hibs and Delia’s comments on fitness were rather obvious. And there were other issues. The main problem was Lawell. You have to wonder what might have been achieved if he had not been there. The money he took out the club was incredible and nauseating. I will always remember my disbelief when Rogers commented on the acquisition of Shved. That was the end for me.

  • John says:

    What is the point of this article? There’s nothing in it that you haven’t written before. All fans that I know want to put last years debacle behind them and look forward to Ange rebuilding the team to get the championship back. History cannot be changed but the future can be shaped into something very successful

    • Damian says:

      True enough. But all of the structural issues that led to Lennon are still there. There’s still no football/sporting department detached from the board. All there is is a manager. What do you do when he leaves? A good Director of Football knows the answer to that question, and updates it all the time.

      • Seppington says:

        I wouldn’t be surprised if the board are dreaming that Ange is successful then eventually move up to the Director of Football role having instilled all of his wisdom into John Kennedy, as that would be the cheapest, laziest option. Then if JK fails, then he goes but Ange stays.

        Won’t go that way though. I get the feeling a successful Ange will be stolen away from us at some point that will feel too soon….

        • Damian says:

          It’s not ‘stolen away’. A successful Ange would have every right to leave. What happens next isn’t his problem. That’s why there has to be a coherent football operation, distinct from the current manager and distinct from the board.

  • Seppington says:

    I get the feeling a bitter Lennon that can’t find a management gig might become the next Charlie Nicholas-type at an ever desperate BBC or SKY…

  • Stephen McAdam says:

    He was a shit manager! Rodgers showed how we should been destroying that league and cups! Like you I reckon it’s a disgrace he was ever given the job first time , I lived overseas at the time and was shocked he survived the first ross county disgrace at hampden but as we know he put us through plenty embarrassing defeats there! Lawell created a self entitled monster in this guy and one can only guess the contempt both really thought of our great fanbase in their private moments, disgraceful! He inherited a machine in Rodgers team he nothing to do with it but you just knew even first night at tyncastle players didnt want him! As you say the Treble TREBLE! Was a once in a lifetime achievement ruined by that announcement I never met anyone that didn’t feel deflated that day,and he knew it! He wasn’t wanted and save us the ” Celtic man” Never in a million years! No way he came as oneil was here and loved the money and idea of Celtic! Slag off Rodgers but I genuinely believe he was a Celtic man even tho he many options ,Lennon couldnt wait to get down south and look how that worked out off the field to tho we all knew he a bit of a strange guy regararding females for me he always be a ” fraud” and the cheek to say we regret it no chance!! Covid and a spiteful desmond allowed that clown to stay and be unrepentant to boot! Pissed in dubia first night and still ” doubled down ” limmy style”it’s an insult to so many great servants of our club legends like Mcstay, McGrain, Aitken amongstest others that this character got the top job may we never hear of him or see him again tho sadly we will

  • Stephen McAdam says:

    Where my post

  • SSMPM says:

    Not sure I can agree that we were a Ferrari of a club when Lennon’s 2nd stint began, to me that’s simply untrue. Try a bit harder to break the guy if you want but it seems all too easy to lay the blame on a guy who represented this club as a player with aplomb. he played his heart out for Celtic, faced armed threats to his family’s lives and assaults in the streets and the field of play. Ultimately he was Liewell and the board’s Yes man and Rodgers was not. The board. Given the opportunity who wouldn’t want to be given the Celtic job, Lennon’s no different but I still believe its easy cosying up to the board now and slaughtering Lennon but its not the truth.
    We had already started the backward ambition way before Lennon’s return when Rodgers saw first hand the pathway to further success at home and particularly in Europe was being stifled by a ‘happy where we are’ feckless Liewell board. Rodgers didn’t leave on a whim, there was at least a year’s worth of frustration on his part at the lack of future board support in taking this club to the next level, not the highest but an improved level. Their decision not to back his future transfer planning was when Rodgers discovered his Ferrari was replaced by a board driven Lada.
    Lennon survived the fist season because the dodgy foundations were still just about intact helped by the rankers horrendous demise after Xmas. In that we were fortunate. Their ability the following season to maintain a winning run through the winter and beyond Xmas was when the mortar slipped between the bricks and that was when the walls come tumbling down. HH

    • Stephen McAdam says:

      Utter garbage! Dont you recall the embarrassing cup defeats! In semis and final he was garbage! And bottled it at the hellhole to win the league in march 2012 never played stokes against the huns from the start and he had always destroyed them and did again while still our player at hibs! Lennon we backed when he was put through hell by that scum but he was and is a shit manager! And dont you remember his off field bs not becoming of a Celtic manager! He won the lottery that guy but only cause it suited a micro management style from lawell, and guys like you bought it! He no right ever to be Celtic manager! And he sint no ” Celtic man” either utter fraud we know our CELTIC MEN!

  • Bob (original) says:

    History will be kinder to Lennon?

    Whilst not a fan of Lennon as a manager – at all – the fault sits fairly and squarely on the Board.

    If you were a manager with limited abilities, with no clubs chasing your signature – would you reject an offer from CFC?

    The appointment of Lennon ‘in the showers at Hampden’ should haunt Lawwell for the rest of his days.

    But it probably won’t! 🙁

  • John Budis says:

    Neil Lennon completed the treble treble when it wasn’t an easy gig.
    He completed the historic quadruple treble.
    He is a Celtic legend and has been treated disrespectfully by some Celtic fans which in my humble opinion does not shine them in a positive light in most Celtic fans eyes.
    The facts speak for themselves.
    There are no garuntees in fitba and ignoring the fact he was a success in his first and second spells as our manager whilst opining that another manager would have done the same AND built us better for the future is mere conjecture.
    Larkin1907

Comments are closed.