Articles

Celtic Should Already Be Way Out In Front Of Any Potential Booze And Betting Ban.

|
Image for Celtic Should Already Be Way Out In Front Of Any Potential Booze And Betting Ban.

The news this week that the most cash-rich league in the world is effectively ending the sponsorship of betting firms on its strips is surprising only for those who have not been paying attention to the steady drum-beat of this stuff in the background.

I remember back when I was a mature student at the University of Stirling, myself and a fellow student council member trying to convince the union to voluntarily ban smoking during lunch and dinner. We were both pretty tuned in to what was happening in Holyrood at the time and knew that things were trending in that direction anyway.

The general manager was fiercely opposed to the very idea of it, and produced a lot of facts and figures to support his claims. But our central contention was that the change was coming whether he liked it or not and that before long it would be public health policy and it wouldn’t be just during mealtimes but a complete ban.

And of course it was, just three years later, and actually only two if you consider that we wouldn’t have implemented the policy until the following year.

The union could have been well ahead of the game on that one, and been an example to universities and colleges everywhere in Scotland. We’d also have had ample time to prepare students for the bigger change.

I was willing to look at both sides of the argument, but I just thought the argument itself was a bit pointless when it was inevitable anyway.

This is one of those situations where you can see what’s coming a mile down the road. If there’s an ounce of common sense amongst the leadership, the SFA and the SPFL should be out in front of this.

We shouldn’t be waiting for legislation to be enacted, the wheels of government are already in motion and so the governors of football should already be planning ahead.

And yet, the opposite is true. The SPFL tonight issued this statement;

“For many SPFL clubs, sponsorship from gambling companies is a significant source of income which helps to support their business models and enables investment in many of the important community activities which clubs undertake.

Individual sponsorships are a matter for each club and there are no plans for a league-wide proscription of such deals.”

These people will wait until laws are already passed before they show a scintilla of imagination.

In the meantime, instead of making alternative arrangements, they will lobby Westminster and Holyrood – in vain – to make sure those are never passed in the first place. Which they will be.

Celtic, as a club, should have alternative plans in motion right now and not wait on the governing bodies being caught asleep at the wheel.

I’m certain that we will already have done our homework on what the alternatives might be. We will be exploring various ideas in relation to future sponsorship deals, and we’d do so from the doubly advantageous position of not being too slow react and – shock horror – having been seen to have done the right thing. Not a bad reason.

The EPL has not taken this action for nothing.

They will have spoken to their political lobbyists and their risk management consultants and they’ll know that if this Tory government doesn’t enact a full ban that Labour will be more than happy to do it for them.

Here, in Scotland, the issue is already the subject of widespread debate. The Scottish Parliament Information Centre has already published a report calling for this. The MSP James Dornan proposed a motion in March last year and was co-sponsored by a cross party group of his parliamentary colleagues. This is moving in a definite direction.

Their consultation on the matter took evidence up until the end of last month.

There is very little doubt that the final report will recommend a ban, and the SPFL knows this full well, in the same way that the EPL already knows what Westminster will do.

This will happen, and it’s just a matter of when.

Clubs should be taking their own independent advice on this, and those which do will surely conclude that it’s in the works and that it’s better to be thinking about what the alternatives are right now.

Bans on alcohol sponsorship in football are equally likely, if not certain, and this is another area where our club should be well ahead of the curve. When these things finally do take place, nobody will be able to say that they weren’t warned.

Share this article

0 comments

  • Johnno says:

    Not an issue that will have any effect upon ourselves whatsoever as we remain a club with a very attractive brand to attract sponsorship very easily.
    The same can’t be said for the scum so this whole issue will drag on until the scum can find alternative shirt sponsorship which could take a good while with so many companies not wanting to be associated with such a vile brand of a so called football club with everything that such scum associate themselves with

  • Stuart Ferrier says:

    Bang on the money, with one distinction, I believe that the ban on gambling relates to front of kit which may leave room for negotiation on sleeve logos ( not sure if current SPL rules forbid sponsorship on the back of shirts?). Hope CFC are looking ahead.

  • Jim The Tim says:

    Sam your a prick

  • Tom Dunlop says:

    Hi, I have never been comfortable with gambling and alcohol companies sponsoring our team . When you consider that Celtic were formed to help the poor people living in the east end of Glasgow. Fast forward 135 years gambling and alcohol are two of the major causes of poverty today. I would hope our board saw this coming and are looking at other revenues of sponsorship. Hail Hail

  • Jim The Tim says:

    Have you looked in a bookies at night and see these poor addicted gamblers destroying their life. It is a fkn eye opener.
    But pleasure from loosing money, no gambler ever got rich some had to get treatment.
    Aye a bit of fkn fun organised criminals.
    Let’s all talk pish on the good points of gambling.

  • Benjamin says:

    I’m a bit skeptical that any such legislation will be forthcoming. The ban in England only applies to front of shirt sponsorships – it’s still okay to have gambling sponsors on the back and sleeves as well as on the digital boards. And that’s to say nothing of the advertising done throughout the broadcasts which is probably the most problematic of all.

    I seriously doubt Holyrood passes any legislation anytime soon, and even if they do it won’t apply to alcoholic beverages. They’ve got enough on their plate to deal with at the moment without adding this on top.

  • Bob (original) says:

    Good article – and spot on.

    Rather than wait to be forced to comply with an imposed future ban,

    Celtic should lead the way – and reinforce the club’s social roots, to help the impoverished in the community.

    Advertising gambling should have no place at Parkhead: it also denigrates the jersey.

    Celtic could/should lead the way.

    There is nothing to stop the Board making a unilateral decision to announce now

    that sponsorships from betting companies will be phased out of Parkhead,

    e.g. in 3 years or even 5 years?

    This could give the club enough time to secure alternative sponsors.

    [A ban on gambling advertising maybe forced on Scottish clubs in 5 years time anyway.]

    It would be a clear statement of intent, and would probably be applauded by the vast

    majority of the support?

  • Joseph Mcaleer says:

    The Amateurs that supposedly run the commercial business for the SFA /SPL, are out of their depth, Celtic FC. are now more than ever are on a pathway to be a multinational business, and must forge ahead as a Independent entity. We are our own masters, creating our financial security…we don’t have “friends” in the Scottish football hierarchy.

Comments are closed.