Articles

Jackson’s Article Wants Collum Sacked. But In “Dougie Dougie” Officials Told Celtic Lies.

|
Image for Jackson’s Article Wants Collum Sacked. But In “Dougie Dougie” Officials Told Celtic Lies.

It’s been a while, hasn’t it? A while since we did a full-scale dissection of a Keith Jackson piece. Today’s rant is worth going over in detail, as there is, to use his own phrase “a lot to unpack.” Boy oh boy, what guff this man has written.

Let’s start with the headline, which Jackson doesn’t write but which he allows to appear over his articles. “Brendan Rodgers has restored Celtic calm after eye popping panic and relit fire under (Ibrox) concerns – Keith Jackson.”

Right away, he’s losing the plot. “Eye popping panic” doesn’t begin to describe how most Celtic fans were feeling. We knew we had problems, but the majority of us trusted the manager to deal with those on the pitch. Where we had doubts were about those off it. Those doubts have not gone away just because Brendan Rodgers has the team winning.

“It was a generous gift to give at this festive time of year.”

What gift was this? I think he means the game itself, but is he really talking about officials giving us points? He’s not very subtle, is he?

“But, like all good presents, Saturday’s barnstormer of an Old Firm derby does require some fairly serious unpacking. First and foremost, Celtic’s 2-1 win should at least allow a bit of perspective to prevail at one end of Glasgow and, by opening up an eight point lead at the top of the table, it will most certainly provide Brendan Rodgers with some badly needed breathing space at a critical moment in his first season back in charge.”

Old Firm derby. It boils my blood. It will boil my blood for along as these people are dragging us into this cesspit which we want no part of. As far as perspective goes, I think most Celtic fans had a sense of it. We know we’ve not been brilliant, but a lot of us were perfectly capable of looking at this in a reasonable and rational manner. People at Celtic have made huge mistakes this season already, but there was nothing here that was incapable of being fixed … and we have the resources and the ability to do just that. I do agree that Rodgers has “breathing space” but that’s mostly from his media snipers who have yet again been silenced.

“It was only a couple of weeks ago, after all, that the most entitled element at the core of this club was threatening to turn full scale against the manager, while posturing mutinously towards the directors box at the same time. Sack the board. Sack the boss. In the furious aftermath of that home defeat to Hearts on December 16 they would have chased Hoopy the Huddle Hound down London Road so utterly consumed had they become with a sense of eye popping panic at the very thought of failing to win a 13th title in 14 years.”

A couple of months back, Jackson was standing alongside the Ibrox fans who wanted to rip their club’s entire upper echelon out, to sack the manager, to bag the players, the whole bit. When Celtic fans express their disgust its “entitlement.” Such double standards. Celtic fans are not entitled. A growing number of us, however, believe that the directors are entitled, and that they believe Celtic is theirs to do with as they please. If Jackson thinks we’re not fully entitled – as fans paying their money – to express our disgust at the chairman’s son presiding over a catastrophic summer window which didn’t meet the manager’s needs, he is a bigger moron than we already recognise him to be.

“So Saturday’s blood and thunder victory over the nearest and dearest will at least have added a bit of calm to the situation and maybe even provided a moment to pause and reflect on the ridiculous nature of this overreaction. Over the course of more than 100 minutes of almighty derby day mayhem, Rodgers seized back control of this season’s title race and, as a result, Rangers have been left to lick their wounds and reassess where they might be heading under the management of Philippe Clement.”

First things first, I find the term “nearest and dearest” in relation to the Ibrox club to be highly objectionable and I don’t care how humorously he intended it. Secondly, if he reads the Celtic sites he’ll have seen calm over the last few weeks, even prior to the game. The so-called “over-reaction” was only partly to do with results; we are concerned about how our club is being run. We are concerned that a small number of people who have been at Parkhead too long have convinced themselves that they are geniuses when in fact they’ve made huge mistakes and they continue to make them. We can separate that from the success of the last few years.

“The Belgian has settled very impressively into the position since taking over from Michael Beale but the bottom line is that he and his players came up short when it mattered most of all at the weekend and this latest painful defeat will have relit the fire under some long running concerns. Put it this way, if Clement had at least one proper striker at his disposal then Rangers would have made it home safely back across the river Clyde with their own title ambitions unharmed and maybe even significantly enhanced.”

Presumptive garbage. Even if the Ibrox club had possessed a decent striker instead of The Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight, I always got the impression that Celtic had more in the locker at the weekend than they showed and I think we would have just found that extra gear and scored again if that was required. Their problems are not down to the absence of one player, and this is where they continue to underestimate us … which as I said this morning, suits us just fine.

“Instead he had to make do with Cyriel Dessers – a player with an unfortunate habit for taking five clumsy touches when only one good one is required. Dessers has been left to carry the load of leading Clement’s attack but – try as he undoubtedly does – Saturday provided yet more proof that he is simply not equipped for the task. When his team needed him to hold the ball up and bring others into play, way too often he could not.”

This is such rubbish because it lets too many people at Ibrox off the hook. Danilo is injured, sure, but Lammers is fit. Roofe is fit. (For the moment anyway.) Sima is the greatest player ever to come to Scotland on loan if you believe some of the stuff written about him. They spent a fortune on their forward line this summer, and they want to blame it all on just one man. They had more forward players available for the game than we did, so what is this? Dessers is a joke of a signing, but then again some of us had been saying that when the media was still talking him up.

“And, yet more damning, on the numerous occasions when he was given a sight at Celtic’s goal he froze like a rabbit in the headlights. Let’s be blunt, Cyriel is a serial offender in that particular department which is precisely why Clement cannot hope to put up a title fight from here on in without beefing up his attacking options this month. The arrival on loan of Wolves striker Fabio Silva might improve things for the short term at least. But Clement should also be asking his board to pick up the phone to Hearts and, at the very least, ask how much would be required to secure the services of Lawrence Shankland.”

And if the Hearts board had a shred of ambition for their club that would be a shorter conversation than those with Logan Roy in Succession which consisted of two words, with the second being “off.” Celtic’s efforts to sign Miovski, if we chose to progress them, would result in a similarly large number, with the only difference that we can afford to pay it should we want to. If I were at Hearts, there’s actually no sum on earth which would get me to part with Shankland and let him go to Ibrox; their fans would be fully entitled to express their fury.

“While Silva comes with a huge £35m price tag and a bundle of unfulfilled promise, Shankland is tried, tested and a prolific operator in the SPFL.”

Actually, Silva arrives with no price tag; he’s a loanee and they aren’t paying up front for him. When will they stop being seduced by these big numbers without context? They did this with Diallo and with Matondo; these were “superstars” because they had once attracted big fees. By the time they were at Ibrox their values had plummeted, otherwise they wouldn’t have gone near the place. Wolves paid £35 million for Silva and got 5 goals in 70 games, and he’s since been passed around like a scud book in a boys rugby club. Who knows what he’s worth on the open market? Certainly not that number. And yeah, Shankland has scored goals in the SPFL, and he would score them at whichever club he was at. Hearts, however, do not score goals without him … which is why they would be mad to let him leave.

“And Clement can’t afford to cross his fingers and hope for the best while waiting to discover if Silva might suddenly come of age here in Scotland after being farmed out previously to clubs in Belgium and Holland. It could be, of course, that Rangers don’t have the funds required to tempt Hearts into doing business. But it’s a discussion which should be taking place nonetheless.”

An approach I certainly won’t try in order to finally secure Sophie Turner’s phone number. I am not optimistic. I have no reason to believe that having the discussion “nonetheless” would be anything other than a waste of my time and quite possibly make her think she has a stalker. What Jackson really means of course is that Ibrox should call Hearts and then leak the story so that it unsettles the player to the extent he starts banging on the door for the move.

“Because what any manager needs in situations like these is the comfort of knowing without doubt that he has players in his team who can be relied upon to deliver at key moments. That’s why Rodgers spoke in such gushing terms about the performance of his captain, Callum McGregor, after Saturday’s skirmish in the east end. McGregor was the best player on the pitch over the entire course of the contest. But, for the ten or fifteen minutes before Celtic’s opening goal, he was the one who grabbed it by the scruff of the neck and refused to let go.”

McGregor was immense. But I slightly bristle at the idea that for ten or fifteen minutes before our goal that we needed him to grab the game by the scruff of the neck, as though we were floundering at that point and needed his leadership. We were in total command, but McGregor was the player who made everything tick. There is no doubt about that.

“During that period McGregor raised his game to a level which no-one in a Rangers shirt could match and most certainly not Todd Cantwell, who was charged directly with the task of keeping him in check. Cantwell had started brightly and carried a creative threat going forward during a rattling first 15 minutes but when McGregor really got motoring in the middle of the pitch the Englishman was left choking on his fumes. He simply did not recover.”

I love the Ibrox fan and media obsession over this joker. I really do. Cantwell is amongst the most over-rated players we’ve watched in Scotland, and this blog and others keep on saying this and it seems that the more we do the more he’s talked up by the mainstream press and the Ibrox fan sites. Big Sutton must have been laughing his backside off at that performance, and the crowning moment of it was when Celtic fans applauded him off the pitch.

“That will also come as a concern for Clement because Cantwell is arguably the single most talented player in his squad. But the manager doesn’t have the time or the room to carry any passengers from this point forward. Of course – and quite shrewdly – the Rangers boss deflected attention away from his team’s own deficiencies at the weekend by jabbing an accusatory finger in the direction of match referee Nick Walsh and VAR operator Willie Collum.”

If Cantwell is the “single most talented player in his squad” then Clement would be as well chucking it right now. Can you believe that he said Clement is “shrewd” to deflect attention from his and his team’s failings by focussing on the officials? Isn’t that a bit self-damning? It certainly damns everyone else in the journalistic profession here and it’s one of the most accurate things in the piece because not a single newspaper is really focussed on how bad their performance was, with everyone looking at Hampden instead. If we had lost and even attempted that they’d be turning the temperature up on us instead of on the officials.

“Clement insisted afterwards that his side should have been given a penalty in the first half after a blatant handball by Alistair Johnston. But he was wrong. Somehow, despite themselves, the officials managed to reach the right decision by not awarding the spot kick. But it was how they arrived at that point that fails just about every conceivable smell test. Broadcasters Sky and BBC Radio Scotland were informed directly from Clydesdale House that the penalty was not awarded because Johnston’s arm movement was not considered to be ‘unnatural’. Whatever that is supposed to mean.”

What does “fails just about every conceivable smell test” actually mean? What exactly is Jackson saying here? What are they expecting to find on this VAR audio? The officials singing The Celtic Song? The broadcasters had that information because some of them are plugged into VAR and can hear every word, so they know already what was said and what wasn’t and if it was newsworthy we’d almost certainly know that already. I would have thought that the explanation – which is exactly the one that’s in the SFA regulations which my sister downloaded for me at half-time in the game – speaks for itself. He knows full well what it is supposed to mean; it means Johnston didn’t make his body bigger and he wasn’t trying to hit the ball out with his arm. It was a bad bounce of the ball, that’s all, and that doesn’t meet the standard required to award a penalty. Let’s face it, if Goldson’s netball effort wasn’t a spot kick there is no way this was.

“To then produce a screen grab – midway through the second half – showing that Abdallah Sima was offside seconds earlier, sniffed very much like a hastily arranged and wholly unconvincing retrospective cover up. It was ironic that Neil Lennon was watching from Sky’s studio because the former Celtic boss might have a mental flashback to the furore caused by the words ‘Dougie Dougie’ on that fateful afternoon at Tannadice when his players were denied a penalty of their own.”

What a ridiculous paragraph. Just plain ridiculous. A retrospective cover-up of what? For what purpose? Nobody fabricated this, it’s a fact, and it’s an additional clarification on a decision that had already been made. The decision didn’t change either way, and actually if you read the statement from Bobby Madden he actually does clarify the order of the announcements and the way the decision would have been made on the pitch. He got right down to the reasons for the goal kick instead of the free kick. Cover up? And comparing it to “Dougie Dougie” where an official actually told Celtic lies is disgusting. There is no indication here that anyone has lied. The audio will certainly be played for their club officials. It’s not as if they’re going to turn up at Hampden to find that it’s been “misplaced” by a mobile phone “accidently dropped” into the sea. Ibrox might not like the official explanation and their media lackies might want to dive off the deep end, as they did over the famous “Dundee email” about which all sorts of malfeasance was alleged, but they just sound nuts.

“Regrettably, this does have a nasty whiff of Dougie Dougie II about it even though the decision was ultimately correct. And, as Dougie McDonald discovered all those years ago, such controversies don’t tend to go away by themselves.”

Again, this is absolute garbage and the intent – which is to force Willie Collum to quit or to force the SFA to take action against him – is equally clear. As I said this morning, if he’s corrupt let’s get it out there. If the allegation is that he has an anti-Ibrox agenda let’s get that on the record and once it’s there let’s clear the Augean Stables out once and for all. But honest to God, the reaction to a decision which is technically correct is preposterous and so over-the-top that had I known nothing else about the game I would have been able to tell you who lost the moment I read some of this hysteria.

At least now the agenda for these people is out there in the open. In bringing up “Dougie Dougie” they want Collum sacked. The difference is that Celtic had iron clad evidence that officials had conspired with each with the intent of feeding us brazen lies. There is exactly no evidence at all that anything remotely like that has happened … Jackson has rightly identified this as a deflection tactic. He’s also shown a willingness to play along with it.

That is some shameful behaviour.

Share this article

0 comments

  • Tony B says:

    Keech Jackson is as balanced and disinterested as any rangers(sic) fan can be in reporting on these matters; ie. not at all.

    His comments can therefore never be taken seriously,being fatally compromised by his partiality towards one club, which he used to play for in his earlier years.

    Apart from the foregoing he is a numpty who knows very little about the subject for which he is paid to write.

  • John Copeland says:

    My biggest concern about the ‘ furore ‘ about a non event penalty decision from Ibrox land and the SMSM especially is that the Rangers will have to be ‘ compensated ‘ as such for their ‘ wrongdoing ‘ by those nasty ,corrupt Celtic friendly officials very soon indeed . That would mean to me that from now until the end of the season everything ,and I mean EVERYTHING ,shall be the Rangers sympathetic . If you thought that the ‘ fix was in ‘ prior to the derby on Saturday , you ain’t seen nowt yet ..as they say in Yorkshire ?

  • Mick says:

    If the rangers want some sort of clarification from the SFA about a decision against them then give it to them then every club in Scotland who have had shocking decisions go against them when they play the rangers would be entitled to the same,which of course will never happen.MON THE HOOPS LETS KICK ON.

  • Lubo's Boots says:

    I think you should do what I do, and countless thousands of others do, and simply not pay any attention to what these turnips write in their rags. Don’t read it. Ignore it. Save your blood pressure. The press in this country is as we all know, for the most part, biased irrelevant and amateur journalism aimed at sales and nothing else. Don’t give them an iota of the attention that they crave.

  • Gordon Raeburn says:

    Brilliant article James. You have completely nailed why the Hun media are a disgrace. How Jackson can bring up the McDonald case to justify his warped view is disgusting. I note he hasn’t mentioned the Goldson .challenge on Paulo, Sterling’s challenge on Greg and the decision not to give us a penalty for Taverner’s foul on David. And I still await Balogun getting lifted by Glasgow’s finest for the spitting episode. Lastly how many flailing “accidental” elbows ended up on Celtic noses or cheekbones

    • Pan says:

      These are all very excellent points that you make Gordon, regarding the disgraceful media in this country.

  • sligo123456 says:

    Loving this tantrum rage by the sevcovians. Perhaps they should concentrate more on improving on the park not off it.

    Brilliant laugh in by the club who keep on giving us laughs by the score. Brilliant start to 2014!

  • Somerset Bhoy says:

    I’m sure Sky said during the game on Saturday that they could hear the VAR audio live. If that’s the case why would any ref, of any persuasion, say anything that would compromise himself later?

  • Paddybhoy67 says:

    Something (maybe everything) is rotten in the state of Sevco, James. The madness and the vitriol, the threats and insanity, the delusions, the incapacity to see the obvious, the distortions of reality are reaching a pitch beyond the levels of 2012. Clement has shown his true colours, feeding the mindless rabble lies and falsehoods to deflect from his and his team’s failings. And bottom-feeders like Jackson stoke the hatred and the rage. I worry where this will all lead, but like you, hope for a root and branch reform of the SFA.

  • harold shand says:

    The same paper who in the last few weeks ran stories such as ,,

    Cantwell was a brave soldier for his cup final performance and Dessers would be celebrating in Rangers pubs with their fans after scoring the winner against us

    Just a fanzine / PR company for one club written by their fans posing as journalists

  • Mick says:

    Some people really have very short or biased memories. The Same fixture on 2nd Jan 2023, resulted in the home team being awarded a penalty that never was, and a hand ball incident not even sent for the referee to review. No massive outcry then or integrity being questioned. Once again selective and agenda driven reporting by the Laptop Loyal.

  • Johnno says:

    This is not the first time the scum have tried to pressurise the Scottish FA into getting there own shabby way within Scottish football?
    Coincidence that the last penalty awarded against the scum, was against the sheep and scotty getting kunt sent off, and another meltdown from the scum, especially when there bigot keeper should have been sent off also?
    My hole is it a Coincidence, it’s nothing more than a pattern?
    What’s happened since that sheep game?
    No penalty conceded since, despite goldhun playing volleyball in his own box?
    This is the face of Scottish football, which has been created by the scum and how they get rewarded in being such tossers in there appeals that hold no substance whatsoever?
    What’s just as dopey is all there scum cheerleaders trying to justify the nonsense actions of the scum?
    Would be totally embarrassed if our club acted in the same manner, so thankful at not being that thick dumb Hun dipshit that there scum cheerleaders like to remain

  • Clachnacuddin and the Hoops says:

    He sounds like a Sevco cheerleader and desperate for Sevco to get Shankland in at Liebrox…

    When I read ma late wee granny’s paper you honestly didn’t know who the writers supported 40 years ago –

    It was probably Rangers (as they were rightly known as then) but they hid it well in an era when they were hopeless and Aberdeen were dominant…

    I clearly am a Scottish Football Media hater and don’t hide it one little bit and will NEVER EVER contribute financially towards then neither online or in print form but once again thanks for flagging up what we are up against in this rancid football country that is not so Bonnie Scotland !

  • Tam says:

    Mr Jackson and the rest of the SMSM said after CELTIC didn’t get a decision and there have been many “it was an honest mistake” ….. others call it cheating….. “The rangers” don’t get a decision and Mr Jackson and the SMSM are as upset as the club…….. will Mr Jackson apologise to Willie Collum and his family when the made-up story that he and the SMSM “WILL” run with… causes the Collum family no end of bother

  • Roonsa says:

    Regardless of what Jackson says, and I only read his words by proxy, I think there is a point to be made regarding the penalty decision. I decided to research their gripe and agree they have a point. Let’s look at it dispassionately

    Reverse the situation. Hun handled in the box. Ref not sent to monitor because it was deemed that the arm was not in an unnatural position. Hun has played the ball with his hand and it went out. Should been a corner to us, then, but huns get a goal kick. I woulda been like that. What? Then, for Sky to be told some time later actually the pen wasn’t given because it was an offside I’d have been even more like WHAT?

    I am happy for this to go to an inquiry. It will set a precedent that will result in that lot backing themselves into a corner. We all welcomed VAR originally because we thought it would be a safeguard against pro hun bias. We all now know it has gotten worse with selective investigation being used to reward them with fortuitously timed pens. Let’s have that inquiry cover all officials as you previously suggested, James.

    Let’s absolutely have this. But Celtic cannot sit back passively and let them have Speakers Corner to themselves. They must go on the counter offensive. Bring it on.

    • Pan says:

      Where is your research Roonsa?
      What you have written in the second paragraph is definitely NOT RESEARCH.
      I speak as one who actually has experience of scientific research.
      Bobby Madden has explained clearly what has happened here.

      • Roonsa says:

        Oh are wegiving credence to the views of Bobby Madden now, are we? I wish someone had told me.

        You don’t need to have experience with scientific research to know that was sarcasm, old fruit.

        When I said research I simply meant blocking out the noise and finding out what the chimps were actually moaning about was. I don’t read the MSM lies. I only get my Celtic news from here so getting a dispassionate view can be difficult when it comes to that lot.

  • Dando says:

    OMG……. the The Rangers FC official partner describes the incident and refers to “updated rules” from IFAB on why the offside player should not have been considered in the decision by VAR…….

    “The IFAB rules outline that for the scenario of when attacking player in an offside position (Team A) runs towards the ball but does not play the ball or prevent the opponent (Team B) from playing or being able to play the ball”….

    WTF……. in what world didn’t Sima (the player who was offside) not prevent Johnson (opponent) from being able to play the ball?

    HH

  • Dinger says:

    Let’s have video audio of all of sevco penalties for and against

  • John L says:

    Was listening to Radio Clyde ssb yesterday and that old juvenile delinquent Keevins was saying rangers are only 2 points behind! , wow, that old tosser is a bigger cheer leader than D,Johnson ever was.

  • Pan says:

    It looks as though from this that Jackson is a bigot of the highest degree / order. There are no reasoned arguments here and he in fact delivers his own biased opinions. I believe Jackson is as stupid as Blue nose Boyd. The evidence certainly suggests as much

  • Lawrence de lacy says:

    I’m a chelsea fan and I was watching this game. Sima was well offside and rangers calling for a penalty shows how deluded this club is, well done var in making the right decision. The better team won , well done celtic.

Comments are closed.